Trump wins over groups who challenged anti-DEI orders
Share this @internewscast.com

President Donald Trump observes as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent formally swears in Paul Atkins as the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the Oval Office at the White House on Tuesday, April 22, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

Two states in the Pacific Northwest are urgently requesting a federal court to prevent President Donald Trump and his administration from meddling with their established election procedures.

On March 25, the 45th and 47th president signed Executive Order 14248, titled “Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections.” This order aims to significantly alter the administration of elections across the country by, among other measures, enforcing a rule that requires all voters to provide official documentation proving their citizenship and discontinuing vote-by-mail systems that accept ballots postmarked by but received after Election Day.

In Oregon and Washington, the default voting mechanism is a postal ballot; such vote-by-mail systems have been in place for decades.

On Thursday, in a 35-page motion for partial summary judgment, the states asked U.S. District Judge John H. Chun, a Joe Biden appointee, to permanently enjoin multiple sections of Trump’s order as unconstitutional and ultra vires, or, beyond the president’s power.

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

“The Constitution is clear: States are responsible for regulating ‘[t]he Times, Places and Manner’ of federal elections, subject only to alteration by Congress,” the motion begins. “The President has no constitutional authority to interfere with state election laws. Nor has Congress given the President statutory authority to do so.”

The plaintiffs are looking for a quick end to the litigation at the district court level by arguing the far-reaching the order simply lacks any authority to undo electoral prerogatives long-exercised by the states.

“Among other things, this order purports to impose new restrictions on registering to vote, set aside long-standing and widespread state laws setting ballot-return deadlines, and dictate which voting machines can be federally certified,” the motion reads. “But the President has no authority to do any of this. And by attempting to assert unilateral control over elections, the President is threatening the foundation of our democracy.”

And without such authority, the plaintiffs say, Trump’s order has no merit — and any agencies enforcing it would be breaking the law.

“The Framers carefully divided power over elections between the States and Congress to prevent the accumulation of power in any one source,” the motion continues. “The President’s illegal effort to consolidate his nonexistent power over elections flies in the face of that principle.”

Chief among the plaintiffs’ complaints are the government’s efforts to prohibit states from accepting mail ballots received after Election Day. In Washington and Oregon, such votes are counted “as long as the ballots were cast on or before election day,” the motion explains.

Trump, for his part, likens such laws to “allowing persons who arrive 3 days after Election Day, perhaps after a winner has been declared, to vote in person at a former voting precinct.”

To that end, the government has sought to condition “any available funding to a State” on the exclusion of ballots received after Election Day. In another case challenging the executive order, the government advanced the notion of using “criminal” prosecutions to secure compliance with the proposed ban.

The states rubbished the Trump administration’s efforts to change their ballot-receipt deadlines as ultra vires — that is, an overreach extending beyond legal power or authority — and lacking any basis in statute.

“This is entirely unlawful,” the motion continues. “Federal law does not create a ballot-receipt deadline. The statutes cited in the Executive Order (2 U.S.C. § 7 and 3 U.S.C. § 1) are conspicuously silent on when timely-cast ballots must be received. The President has no authority to invent new election regulations. Any effort by the U.S. Attorney General to enforce the made-up ballot-receipt deadline is unlawful, as is imposing new, non-congressionally approved conditions on federal funding.”

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Three Starving Children Guide Police to Their Parents’ Bodies: Authorities Report

A Houston Police Department vehicle is parked at a shooting scene at…

Woman Accused of Setting House on Fire with Mother and Boyfriend Inside: Police Report

Inset: Sarah Shelburne (Nelson County Detention Center). Background: The home Shelburne allegedly…

Thieves Take Family’s Car Loaded with Luggage and Passports as They Set Out for Vacation

A family in south-east Melbourne has been left shaken after their car…

Brothers Accused of Murdering Father Over Family Inheritance Sale Plans

Inset left to right: Jacob Hitchcock and Joshua Hitchcock (Carter County Sheriff’s…

Man Accused of Dragging Wife’s Body Before Escaping the Country

Background: A man believed to be Jossimar Cabrera dragging a large bundle…

Son Learns Sentence After Killing Mother Over Missing Money and Hiding Her Body

Inset: Troy Michael Mitteness (Dakota County Jail). Background: Dakota County District Courthouse…

Police Officer Charged After Infant Son Suffers Brain Injury

Inset: Cameron Coronado (Sauk County Sheriff’s Office). Background: The Portage County Police…

Police Report: Man Accused of Inflicting Fatal Blows on Infant Over 40 Times

Share copy link Background: The neighborhood in Grimes, Iowa, where police were…

Judge Rejects Bid to Unseal Epstein Grand Jury Documents

A federal judge in New York who presided over the sex trafficking…

Officers at Jail Accused of Indenting Inmate’s Skull: Mother and Police

Photograph Large: Florida inmate Christopher Castro (Florida Department of Corrections). Smaller photos,…

Gainesville resident charged with deliberately igniting her own apartment

Staff report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Jermaya Lavaghn Richardson, 32, was arrested last…

Ethics Complaint Submitted Against U.S. Attorney in Upstate New York

Inset: Acting U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of New York John…