SCOTUS Allows ICE to Keep Arresting Illegals in Sanctuary City Los Angeles

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to bypass a lower court’s decision. This earlier ruling had prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting federal immigration enforcement activities, citing these actions as racial profiling.

In July, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by then-President Joe Biden. She had stopped ICE from executing raids in the sanctuary area of Los Angeles, California.

Before the Trump administration sought SCOTUS’s intervention to let ICE persist in capturing illegal immigrants in Los Angeles during the legal proceedings, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had supported Frimpong’s decision.

On Monday, Justice Kavanaugh, representing the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision, stated that “the government has adequately demonstrated the need for a stay while the appeal is pending.”

Justice Kavanaugh emphasized that “stopping individuals based on reasonable suspicions of unlawful presence has long played a critical role in U.S. immigration enforcement efforts for decades, spanning multiple presidential terms.” With the current rise in illegal immigration under Biden, ICE’s attention on Los Angeles appears justified.

Kavanaugh further noted, “Individuals in the country illegally seeking to avoid law enforcement questioning are essentially aiming to bypass the law, which does not constitute a significant legal interest.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sotomayor, in writing a dissenting opinion that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined, called the court’s stay on the lower court’s decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor writes. “Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent.”

The case is Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, No. 25A169 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

You May Also Like

Trump claims there are ‘no limits’ to his power in controversial post invoking Hitler

President Donald Trump said in an interview with Axios on Thursday that…

3-Year-Old Boy Reportedly Attacked by Crocodile After Disabled Man Allegedly Threw Him Into Water

A three-year-old boy was attacked by at least one crocodile after a…

Fire at Dominican Republic Resort Kills One, Forces Nearly 1,700 to Evacuate

A large fire swept through a beachfront resort in the Dominican Republic…

Andy Burnham Pledges to Nationalise Utilities if He Replaces Keir Starmer in No.10

Andy Burnham used his victory rally yesterday to set out a sweeping…

Kat Von D Faces Disturbing Animal Abuse Allegation in Hollywood Home Controversy

Teva Barnea, the grieving son of the former owners of a Hollywood…

Former Guest Calls Chelsea Handler ‘Awful’ in Blunt Criticism

British comedian Gina Yashere, who once appeared on Chelsea Handler’s E! series,…

Trump Envoy Steve Witkoff, Iranian Minister Set for Switzerland Talks

US envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi were both…

Over 1,100 Small-Boat Migrants Arrive in Britain Over Four Days

More than 1,100 migrants have crossed to Britain in small boats over…

Fans of Karmelo Anthony Spark Backlash With Dance Mocking Austin Metcalf’s Death

Supporters of Karmelo Anthony have sparked a troubling social media craze that…

Austin Metcalf 911 Call Reveals Heartbreaking Details of His Final Moments

The final, devastating moments of Austin Metcalf’s life were captured in two…

Deidre Hall Playfully ‘Slaps’ Craig Melvin During Today Show Moment

Deidre Hall ‘slapped’ Craig Melvin during a live TV interview on the Today…

Celebrity Hotspot Seized Over $1.2 Million Unpaid Bill in Shocking Financial Crackdown

A fashionable New York City restaurant has been abruptly shut down after…