SCOTUS Allows ICE to Keep Arresting Illegals in Sanctuary City Los Angeles

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to bypass a lower court’s decision. This earlier ruling had prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting federal immigration enforcement activities, citing these actions as racial profiling.

In July, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by then-President Joe Biden. She had stopped ICE from executing raids in the sanctuary area of Los Angeles, California.

Before the Trump administration sought SCOTUS’s intervention to let ICE persist in capturing illegal immigrants in Los Angeles during the legal proceedings, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had supported Frimpong’s decision.

On Monday, Justice Kavanaugh, representing the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision, stated that “the government has adequately demonstrated the need for a stay while the appeal is pending.”

Justice Kavanaugh emphasized that “stopping individuals based on reasonable suspicions of unlawful presence has long played a critical role in U.S. immigration enforcement efforts for decades, spanning multiple presidential terms.” With the current rise in illegal immigration under Biden, ICE’s attention on Los Angeles appears justified.

Kavanaugh further noted, “Individuals in the country illegally seeking to avoid law enforcement questioning are essentially aiming to bypass the law, which does not constitute a significant legal interest.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sotomayor, in writing a dissenting opinion that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined, called the court’s stay on the lower court’s decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor writes. “Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent.”

The case is Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, No. 25A169 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

You May Also Like

JD Vance’s Fiery Speech Derailed by Flag-Waving Heckler

Vice President JD Vance was among the last major voices to address…

Former Scottish Laird Jailed for Throttling Woman at Queen Tribute Concert

A former Scottish laird has been sentenced to two years in prison…

Mamdani Honors 9/11 Victims, Heroes During Interfaith Walk to NYC Islamic Center

Mayor Zohran Mamdani joined New Yorkers from across religious communities Thursday evening…

Russian Troops Gifted Dead Prince’s Hand to Lift Morale

Russian troops are being offered an unusual form of encouragement on the…

The Most Disturbing Evidence Facing Tyler Robinson, Explained

A year ago, conservative activist Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck…

Rare Ice Age Fossil From Giant Extinct Beast Found in California

A massive tooth believed to be at least 10,000 years old has…

Cunningham Launches Solo Podcast After Trans Debate Rift

WNBA standout Sophie Cunningham has relaunched her podcast with a new name…

Savannah Guthrie Shares Rare Update on Mom Nancy After Her Absence

Savannah Guthrie made an unusually personal reference to her missing mother during…

Lindsay Clancy Juror Says Holdout Reenacted Children’s Killings During Deliberations

A juror from Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial is speaking publicly about the…

Gavin Newsom’s 2028 Presidential Odds Sink Sharply on Prediction Markets

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is increasingly looking like a 2028 presidential contender,…

Hero of Gatwick Becomes Human Megaphone to Aid easyJet Staff

As delays dragged on for hours at Gatwick, patience among stranded passengers…

The Last Person to Speak With Charlie Kirk Before the Shooting Shares Their Account

On September 10, 2025, Hunter Kozak left the hospital where his newborn…