New study shows 72% of Illinois wetlands not federally protected
Share this @internewscast.com

URBANA, Ill. (WCIA) — A new study from the U of I says more than 70% of Illinois wetlands are not federally protected.

Despite this, one local expert talked about the types of benefits these areas provide.

“We have radically remade the land and water in Illinois,” said Prairie River Network Water Policy Director Robert Hirschfeld.

One of these areas is Busey Woods in Champaign County, with others located throughout Central Illinois. However, following a 2023 Supreme Court ruling, a significant portion of these lands lost the protection they previously had under the 1972 Clean Water Act, which experts warn could lead to a series of issues.

“We’ve already lost so many of our historic wetlands,” Hirschfeld said. “Only about 10% remain.”

Much of which have turned into farmland, which he said is already affecting Illinois.

“The amount of flood protection that wetlands provide, you know, it’s hundreds of millions of dollars in Illinois alone annually,” Hirschfeld said.

He said they also help filter drinking water, take in tons of carbon and provide a much-needed habitat for wildlife.

“A lot of endangered and threatened species make their homes in wetlands,” Hirschfeld said.

A study posted this month by the U of I said 72% of the state’s remaining wetlands are not protected under the Clean Water Act.

“Wetlands that have already been drained or destroyed aren’t affected here, regardless of whether it’s federal or state law, because what’s done is done,” Hirschfeld explained. “Our focus must be on safeguarding what still exists.”

Hirschfeld and the Prairie River team have already developed a strategy. They’re advocating for the State Wetlands Protection Law, which would enable the state to maintain the protective role traditionally held by the federal government.

“Wetlands would be categorized according to their size and ecological importance,” Hirschfeld stated. “Based on this classification, you’d receive a permit. If permitted to fill a wetland, you would be required to mitigate the impact.”

With one clear exception.

“Given the extensive land used for farming and agriculture’s significant role in the economy, the proposed state legislation explicitly exempts standard farming activities,” Hirschfeld noted.

He said the bill will most likely get a big push and be discussed in the spring legislative session.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Turkey Arrests 9 Suspects Linked to Attack at Israeli Consulate in Istanbul: Security Measures Tightened

ISTANBUL – In a significant development, Turkish authorities have apprehended nine individuals…

Sullivan County Mayoral Showdown: Key Insights & Highlights from the Pre-Election Forum

BRISTOL, Tenn. — In a spirited forum held on Wednesday evening, the…

Why This Japanese Town Is Rethinking Its Cherry Blossom and Mount Fuji Tourism Boom

FUJIYOSHIDA – A captivating photograph sparked an unexpected issue. Social media platforms…

Florida Sheriff’s Warning: Teenage Boys Risk Lives in Dangerous ‘Real-Life Frogger’ Stunt

In Flagler County, Florida, the local Sheriff’s Office has turned to social…

Lady Vol Basketball Secures First Recruit from Transfer Portal

In Knoxville, Tennessee, the Lady Vols basketball team is making waves with…

Rising Political Tensions Drive Up Candidate Security Expenses, Report Finds

Over the past decade, spending on security for congressional and presidential campaigns…

Game Changer: TN Bill Proposes Private School Athletes Joining Public School Teams

Students from private schools may soon have the opportunity to showcase their…

Carter County Resident Faces Multiple Animal Cruelty Charges

A woman from Carter County is under scrutiny after being charged with…

Shocking Incident: Man Drives into Brevard County Canal with Ex-Partner, Authorities Report

MERRITT ISLAND, Fla. – John Lucas appeared visibly distraught upon learning that…