Appeals court rules against Trump in birthright citizenship battle
Share this @internewscast.com

(The Hill) — A federal appeals court ruled against President Trump on Friday, barring the administration from ending birthright citizenship.

A three-judge panel from the First Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld an injunction from a district court, which prevents the administration from implementing a presidential executive order from January aimed at restricting birthright citizenship.

The court expressed caution in its extensive 100-page opinion, stating, “Historical lessons urge us to be cautious about endorsing this latest attempt to depart from the long-standing tradition of recognizing birthright citizenship, making it contingent upon a parent’s actions, instead of the straightforward fact of being born on U.S. soil, except in the rarest cases.”

Boston’s federal appeals court is the newest judicial body to challenge the president’s initiative to terminate birthright citizenship, affirming that this principle grants citizenship to anyone born in the U.S., irrespective of their parents’ immigration status, and is probably unlawful.

The court’s chief judge noted in the ruling, “Our nation’s history of attempts to limit birthright citizenship—from the Dred Scott decision prior to the Civil War to the rationale behind the Chinese Exclusion Act case, Wong Kim Ark—has been less than honorable.”

This latest appellate court ruling is the fifth to either deliver or support directives blocking Trump’s order since June, part of his extensive immigration reforms since reassuming the presidency.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta welcomed the ruling in a post online.

On social platform X, Bonta commented, “Today’s ruling sustains a nationwide injunction in our lawsuit against the President’s bid to eliminate, by merely signing a document, the constitutional right to birthright citizenship.”

He added, “We will continue to oppose this executive order until the President’s attempt to unmake the Constitution is blocked completely.”

The Golden State was among the 20 states included in the lawsuit.

Late last month, the Department of Justice asked the Supreme Court to review whether Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship is constitutional. 

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

NASA’s Artemis Program Redefines Space Exploration: Expanding Opportunities Beyond Apollo Era

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, Fla – Before the roar of rockets and the…

Johnson City Animal Shelter Hosts Inaugural ‘Cruising For A Cause’ Car Show with Over 100 Vehicles in Washington County

The Washington County Johnson City Animal Shelter in Tennessee revved up excitement…

Michigan Overpowers Vols, Concluding Their Season in the Elite Eight

CHICAGO, Ill. (WATE) — Tennessee’s journey in the NCAA tournament has been…

Zendaya Hints at Bridal-Inspired Fashion Line Incorporating Tradition and Innovation

Zendaya is enjoying her last few days of wearing something blue. As…

Kosovo Faces Economic Strain as Rising Fuel Costs Hit Hard Amid Middle East Tensions

PRISTINA – Kushtrim Ajvazi takes pride in contributing to the success of…

Adventurous Kangaroo Chesney Escapes Zoo and Roams Free for Three Days

How does a kangaroo break out of a petting zoo? No, it’s…

Honoring Heroes: Join the American Legion’s Vietnam Veterans Day Ceremony This Sunday

On Sunday afternoon, the Kings Mountain Post 24 of the American Legion…

Lucky Chuckey Resident Scores $480,000 with Winning Lottery Ticket!

A lottery ticket purchased in Chuckey, Greene County, Tennessee, has turned into…