Chancellor Rachel Reeves is considering introducing a new mansion tax that could cost homeowners thousands annually, as part of a proposed strategy for the upcoming Budget. This initiative is seen as a potential effort to address economic disparities.

The plan suggests imposing a 1 percent tax on properties valued over £2 million, affecting the excess amount. For instance, a property worth £3 million would incur an annual tax of £10,000. This measure aims to target higher-value properties to generate revenue.

Critics, including property experts, have labeled the proposal as a “blunt and crude instrument,” warning it could disrupt the housing market and unfairly burden older homeowners. Meanwhile, Conservative voices have dismissed it as a divisive strategy, arguing it could be counterproductive.

This consideration signals Ms. Reeves’ potential focus on taxing wealthier individuals in the Budget, which may also include significant increases in income tax and reduced tax-free allowances for pensioners, as she seeks solutions for a £40 billion deficit in public finances.

The Budget’s preparation is spearheaded by Treasury Minister Torsten Bell, who previously served as Ed Miliband’s policy director when the mansion tax was a key part of Labour’s 2015 election manifesto.

The previous proposal suggested that homeowners with properties valued between £2 million and £3 million would face an additional £3,000 in taxes annually, with much higher rates for owners of more expensive properties and those with second homes.

The ‘1 per cent’ proposal would be similar to the Liberal Democrats’ policy in the 2010 general election, and could raise between £2billion and £3billion for the Exchequer.

Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride said: ‘Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves promised not to raise taxes, now we know they are planning to do just that. If Starmer and Reeves introduce a so-called mansion tax, they will be punishing aspiration and hitting hard-working people. This isn’t fairness, it’s class war.

Rachel Reeves (pictured) could hit homeowners with a new mansion tax costing thousands of pounds a year as part of a class war plan being considered for next month’s Budget

Under the proposals, the owners of properties worth £2million and above would face a charge of one per cent of the amount by which the property exceeds that value (Stock Image)

The proposals mean that owners of a £3million property would face a bill of £10,000 every year (Stock Image)

‘If Rachel Reeves had a backbone, she’d get a grip of spending – including the welfare bill – instead of raising taxes again and chasing out the very wealth creators our economy depends on.

‘Under Labour, nothing is safe –not your job, your home, your savings or your pension. Rachel Reeves will tax your children’s future to pay for her failure.’

The plans come as exclusive new polling reveals the collapse in public confidence over the state of the economy. 

The survey, conducted by former Conservative deputy chairman Lord Ashcroft and shared with The Mail on Sunday, shows that just 1 per cent of voters think that the economy will fare ‘very well’ over the next year. Nearly three quarters, 73 per cent, think that it will perform badly.

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch and Mr Stride are preferred over Sir Keir Starmer and Ms Reeves in terms of running the economy by 28 per cent to 25 per cent. 

The poll also finds that nearly half of all voters, 45 per cent, think that Ms Reeves should not break Labour’s manifesto promises over tax.

Introducing a mansion tax would require a complicated and bureaucratic property revaluation, as the current council tax bands are based on the property values of April 1991.

Last week, The Mail on Sunday revealed that Ms Reeves was also considering introducing new council tax bands for higher-valued properties.

Until last year, Mr Bell was the chief executive of the Resolution Foundation think-tank, which proposed a root-and-branch reform of property taxation in the UK. It floated the idea of scrapping council tax and replacing it with a flat charge of 0.5 per cent of a property’s value every year.

The foundation also proposed ripping up the current inheritance tax system and replacing it with a new one that levies tax on individual heirs, not estates, with a lifetime tax-free allowance of £125,000, a basic rate of 20 per cent tax on inherited income up to £500,000 and a 30 per cent tax on income of more than £500,000.

Lucian Cook, head of residential research at estate agent Savills, said that a mansion tax targeting homes worth more than £2million was a ‘very blunt and crude instrument’ that was unlikely to truly target the wealthy.

He said: ‘There’s a big difference between someone in a £2million house without a mortgage and someone with a sizeable mortgage. So it doesn’t necessarily capture net wealth at all.’

Torsten Bell (pictured) is leading the new Budget preparations – he worked for Ed Miliband’s when he included the mansion tax in Labour’s 2015 general election manifesto

Under Bell’s 2015 plans, people with homes worth between £2million and £3million would have paid £3,000 a year in extra taxes (Stock Image)

He added that it was ‘very difficult to get accurate valuations’ of properties worth over £2million as such houses tend to be ‘quite specific properties, so administering this tax is going to be expensive because any valuation is likely to be contested’.

Mr Cook also said ‘older retired households’ who had seen the value of their property increase over a long period of time could be caught by the mansion tax but ‘not necessarily have the means to pay for it’.

Neal Hudson, founder of housing market data firm Residential Analysts, said the fact a mansion tax was being considered meant the Treasury was likely ‘looking at this as a way of raising revenue’ and was not ‘particularly concerned about the efficiency or fairness of the property market.’

He said: ‘There’s a danger this will have some fairly negative impacts. The top end of the market has been stagnating for the last decade already as it’s been hit by higher rates of stamp duty.

‘So this will just depress transactions even more. [The Treasury] might make more money from an ongoing tax but you might find there are suddenly a lot of properties priced just below £2million.’ 

He also predicted ‘lots of legal challenges to work through’ as homeowners contested the valuation of their properties if they fell within the threshold of the tax.

‘There will be a lot of unhappy estate agents in Central London if it happens,’ Hudson added.

A Treasury spokesman said: ‘The Chancellor makes tax policy decisions at fiscal events. We do not comment on speculation around future changes to tax policy.’

The man behind the plan 

Torsten Bell – the man who is effectively writing the Budget for Rachel Reeves – only entered the Commons last year, but is already being tipped as a future Chancellor.

The product of a Swedish mother, who works as an author and policy analyst, and his Scottish charity executive father, the 43-year-old was educated at The Judd School, a super-selective grammar in Kent.

After reading philosophy, politics and economics at Oxford, Bell was fast-tracked through Labour’s advisory ranks to become Ed Miliband’s head of policy in the run up to the 2015 election, writing a manifesto which included the original mansion tax.

He was part of the team behind the infamous ‘EdStone’, a tablet bearing the inscription of election pledges resembling a tombstone which has become indelibly associated with Miliband’s election loss to David Cameron.

But it was as the boss of the influential Left-wing think-tank Resolution Foundation that he honed his radical economic ideas, including a wealth tax and changes to capital gains and inheritance tax.

Bell (pictured) is effectively writing the Budget for Reeves and has been tipped as a future Chancellor