There are varied concerns, including the simplification of approval processes, potential weakening of environmental safeguards, and the extent of ministerial discretion possibly undermining reforms. Additionally, there are worries about reporting obligations potentially delaying projects.

Here’s a summary of what is currently being proposed.

The Greens have advocated for a halt to native logging. In contrast, Labor assured them over the weekend that the native forestry sector would need to adhere to the upcoming national environmental standards within a three-year timeline.

The government plans to reassess bilateral agreements with states, which could grant them assessment or approval authority in certain situations. Nevertheless, the minister will still hold the final decision-making authority, irrespective of any bilateral agreements.

Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, a member of the committee evaluating the environmental protection legislation, contends that a three-year period for the native forestry industry to comply is “excessively long.” Source: AAP / Mick Tsikas

Last month, Watt ruled out the Greens’ demands for a climate trigger, which would see projects rejected if they worsen carbon emissions or impact climate change.

The Coalition

The minister will have the power to set KPIs as well as sack the head of the proposed National Environment Protection Agency, addressing concerns they would have too much power.