Share this @internewscast.com
A high school in Sydney has ignited controversy over a new uniform policy that critics argue unfairly targets female students by prohibiting items such as bike shorts, leggings, and low-cut tops, while boys remain unaffected by these restrictions.
Outcry has arisen from both students and parents at Mosman High School, located on Sydney’s lower north shore, as they express their disapproval of the dress code that was implemented last month. This policy change has prompted considerable backlash within the school community.
Mosman High stands out as one of the few state schools in New South Wales that operates without a traditional uniform requirement, a choice made in the 1980s to set it apart from nearby private institutions. However, the recent clampdown on certain attire worn by female students has reignited the debate over school dress codes.
Female students contend that they face potential detention or even suspension for violating the new guidelines, highlighting a perceived gender bias in the enforcement of these rules. Some students report being reprimanded by teachers for wearing tight tops, despite these not being explicitly banned under the new regulations.
“It seems to me that it’s less about the dress code and what you’re wearing, and more about your body,” one student remarked in an interview with the Daily Telegraph, encapsulating the sentiment of many who feel unjustly singled out by the policy.
‘It seems to me that it’s less about the dress code and what you’re wearing, and more about your body,’ one girl told the Daily Telegraph.
‘People with a certain body type won’t get ‘dress-coded’ for low-cut shirts, but if you have a bigger chest, you might get dress-coded for wearing a low-cut shirt.’
Girls’ activewear such as leggings and bike shorts have been banned by a Sydney school (stock image)
The new dress code at Mosman High School on Sydney’s lower north shore does not apply to boys
One parent said that the new restrictions ignored body diversity among young girls.
Principal Susan Wyatt addressed parents’ concerns about the new dress code in a recent newsletter.
‘Firstly, let me say that non-uniform is such a valuable approach to ensuring equity and support for student wellbeing,’ she wrote.
‘I believe the dress code is reasonable and presents a balance between comfort and being mindful that we are in a school where learning is the focus.
‘Mosman High is a special school, and our non-uniform is part of what makes us special.’
Ms Wyatt has referred media inquiries to the NSW Department of Education, which redirected the matter back to the school.
The saga sparked widespread debate on breakfast television and radio across the nation on Monday.
‘It’s an interesting one,’ Sunrise co-host Nat Barr said.
Mosman is one of the few state high schools in NSW that doesn’t have a designated school uniform (stock image)
‘There’s no rule for the boys, who can wear whatever they like.
‘This will blow up.’
NSW shadow education spokesperson Sarah Mitchell, who previously served as minister in the former Coalition government, urged the school to resolve the matter after speaking with an impacted student.
‘The message I got from speaking to her is that they think there’s a double standard,’ she told 2GB host Ben Fordham.
‘The school leaders, parents and kids should all sit down and find a sensible way forward so that the girls feel comfortable.’
‘As long as it’s not revealing or inappropriate, I think their argument makes sense.’
The saga divided Aussies online.
‘We can ban hot pants but not a burqa?’ one man posted.
However, many also supported an activewear ban.
‘The school shouldn’t have to go to these lengths, and if the students and parents don’t like the ban, then they should look at changing schools,’ one woman commented.
Another added: ‘I don’t even wanna see it at the shops, let alone know it’s being worn in schools. I would never have even contemplated wearing that to school in the 2000s.’
A third wrote: ‘It’s about time teenagers stopped doing whatever they like for a change.’