On Thursday, references to hate symbols as “potentially divisive” were removed from U.S. Coast Guard policy, prompting a U.S. senator to lift a hold on a key nomination within the service. This update comes after some controversy surrounding the Coast Guard’s stance on such symbols.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who is responsible for overseeing the Coast Guard, announced on social media that these changes were implemented to prevent any “misrepresentation” of the branch’s views. Her remarks aimed to clarify the Coast Guard’s position on hate symbols and ensure their policies are accurately portrayed.

Noem emphasized that outdated policy pages would be entirely removed to prevent misinterpretation by media outlets, organizations, or public officials. This step is intended to avoid any political exploitation of the Coast Guard’s policies regarding divisive symbols.

This decision marks the conclusion of a series of revisions to the Coast Guard’s policy concerning hate symbols such as swastikas and nooses, which had previously stirred public outcry. According to the Department of Homeland Security, there was never an intended “downgrade” in the language used in these policies.

Noem’s statement followed Democratic Senator Jacky Rosen of Nevada’s decision to block the nomination of Admiral Kevin Lunday for the role of Coast Guard commandant. Rosen had expressed concerns that leadership seemed to retreat from acknowledging swastikas and nooses as hate symbols, which should be banned from display.

On Thursday, Rosen announced via social media that she was lifting her hold on the nomination. She expressed eagerness to collaborate with Lunday to further enhance the Coast Guard’s anti-harassment policies.

“While I continue to have reservations about the process by which this happened and the confusion created by leadership at the Department of Homeland Security, I am pleased to see that the policy now directly refers to stronger language against swastikas and nooses,” she said.

Noem called the delay of Lunday’s nomination a “politicized holdup,” saying it had gone on long enough and he should be confirmed without delay.

“He has given nearly 39 years of distinguished service to the Coast Guard, this country, and the American people,” she said.

The Coast Guard’s planned policy change calling hate symbols “potentially divisive” emerged publicly last month. It stopped short of banning them, instead saying that commanders could take steps to remove them from public view and that the rule did not apply to private spaces, such as family housing.

DHS has said the change “strengthens our ability to report, investigate, and prosecute those who violate longstanding policy.”

The Coast Guard said on social media that it “maintains a zero-tolerance policy toward hate symbols, extremist ideology, and any conduct that undermines our core values. We prohibit the display or promotion of hate symbols in any form. Any suggestion otherwise is false.”

The Washington Post first reported the latest developments.