Trade Minister Chris Bryant has launched a blistering critique of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, an individual who, lacking the protection of his former titles, has found himself squarely in the crosshairs of public and governmental scrutiny.

During a fervent debate, Bryant expressed the collective outrage felt by many. “I doubt there is anyone in this house who is not shocked and appalled by the recent allegations,” he declared, underscoring the gravity of the situation.

He further detailed the experiences shared with him by colleagues and civil servants regarding Mountbatten-Windsor, which paint a consistent picture. “Their stories reveal a man on a relentless quest for self-aggrandizement and personal gain,” Bryant said, describing him as “rude, arrogant, and entitled, unable to differentiate between the public interest he claimed to serve and his own private pursuits.”

The allegations against Mountbatten-Windsor suggest that during his nearly decade-long tenure as the UK’s special representative for international trade and investment, he may have improperly shared government information with the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

The legislative body has unanimously voted to release documents concerning Mountbatten-Windsor’s appointment. This decision came after the Liberal Democrats employed a rarely used parliamentary procedure, a humble address, to compel the Labour government to act on this pressing issue.

The house voted unanimously to approve the release of documents related to his appointment after the Liberal Democrats used an arcane parliamentary procedure known as a humble address to pressure the Labour government on the matter.

Liberal Democrats leader Ed Davey argued it was time for transparency.

“In many ways, this is the first truly global scandal from the White House and Silicon Valley to Oslo and Paris, but it’s also a deeply British scandal reaching right to the top of the British establishment,” Davey said in opening the debate.

Politicians lined up to criticise Andrew and at least four of them said convention shielding the royal family in parliament should end.

“These arcane rules make a mockery of our democracy,” Scottish National Party MP Brendan O’Hara said.

“Nobody, regardless of rank or privilege, should or must be above the law.”

Speaker Lindsay Hoyle had given lawmakers approval to discuss the former prince on the basis that he is no longer a member of the royal family, having been stripped of his titles.

Bryant said he would try to get the documents released as soon as possible, but officials would need to check it would not interfere with the police investigation.

The police began investigating Mountbatten-Windsor after the US government last month released emails appearing to show he had passed documents to Epstein while he worked as a trade envoy. Trade envoys are usually barred from sharing such material under confidentiality rules.

He was the first member of the British royal family to be arrested in more than three centuries when he was questioned by officers on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

He has always denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein, and said he regrets their friendship.

He has not spoken publicly since the release of more than 3 million pages of documents by the US government relating to Epstein, who was convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor in 2008.

The debate in Britain’s parliament came as the US Justice Department’s release of millions of pages of documents related to Epstein exposes how the wealthy financier used an international web of rich, powerful friends to gain influence and sexually exploit young women.

Nowhere has the fallout been felt more than in the UK, where the scandal has raised questions about the way power is wielded by the aristocracy, senior politicians and influential businessmen, known collectively as “the establishment”.

– Reported with Associated Press and Reuters

NEVER MISS A STORY: Get your breaking news and exclusive stories first by following us across all platforms.