Trump’s Turkey stance sparks concern amid NATO summit, Netanyahu warning
As leaders gathered for the NATO summit, President Donald Trump described U.S.-Turkey relations as “better than it’s ever been,” even as questions persisted over the F-35 program and Ankara’s role in the region. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, however, has continued to accuse Turkey of backing Hamas. Wall Street Journal reporter Olivia Beavers noted that some Republicans are uneasy with Trump’s posture, with behind-the-scenes resistance emerging over fears that any shift could alter the balance of power in the Middle East.
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz sharpened the warning to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan early Thursday, accusing him of pulling Turkey into what he called “dangerous adventures in Syria” and cautioning that Israel’s willingness to defend itself should not be challenged.
“Israel will not allow any actor to threaten its security,” Katz wrote in a post on X. He added that Erdoğan would be better off continuing his “detached-from-reality” speeches against Israel in Turkey’s parliament rather than trying to measure Israel’s determination to protect itself.
The exchange followed Israel’s strike two days earlier on Syria’s Abu al-Duhur Airbase, a development that has further intensified friction between Israel and Turkey. The rising tensions have left Washington trying to manage a delicate diplomatic standoff between Turkey, a NATO ally, and Israel, one of the United States’ most important security partners in the Middle East. Israeli officials said Syria was close to violating a security understanding by permitting Turkish forces to deploy at the site, a claim Ankara strongly denied.
Syrian officials said there were no arrangements for a permanent Turkish base or formal troop presence, though Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani confirmed that Turkish military personnel had visited the airbase for training and knowledge-sharing purposes. Turkey’s Defense Ministry also said no Turkish military delegation was at the facility either before or during the Israeli strike, according to Reuters.
A satellite image shows craters on the runways of Abu al-Duhur Airbase near Syria’s Aleppo after an Israeli attack, August 19, 2026. (Pleiades Neo © Airbus DS 2026/Handout via Reuters)
On Wednesday, Turkey dismissed Israel’s accusations as “untenable,” saying they were designed to justify what Ankara called unlawful airstrikes against Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. In a social media statement, the Turkish government argued that the claims reflected Netanyahu’s desire to advance “expansionist and destabilizing policies” in the region ahead of Israel’s elections.
U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told Reuters on Thursday that Washington was pursuing “a de-escalation process” that was already underway, though he said it still required further work. Asked whether the dispute might spiral into a direct confrontation between Israel and Turkey, Huckabee replied, “I don’t think we’re even close to that.” He said Israel believes Turkey is “moving further south” inside Syria and sees that movement as a possible security threat.
U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria Tom Barrack sounded a sharper warning after the strike. Barrack said Turkey had received no advance notice and could have prepared a military response after detecting Israeli aircraft heading north toward Turkish territory. He said Washington was working to establish a more robust deconfliction mechanism among Turkey, Israel and Syria to prevent miscalculation or an accidental confrontation.
Sinan Ciddi, director of the Turkey Program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told News Outlet that Ankara is portraying the confrontation through a sharply different lens.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir and Defense Minister Israel Katz attend a meeting. (GPO)
“Turkey is chalking up the increasingly escalatory climate between Turkey and Israel to election antics/propaganda by Netanyahu and driving a narrative that Israel does not want stable neighbors and regional powers in the Middle East,” Ciddi said.
At the same time, Ciddi said Erdoğan “seems intent on taking actions inside Syria that are perceived by Israel as military escalation,” citing proposed arms sales, military training and assistance, continued Turkish influence over former militia members integrated into Syria’s new army and, most significantly, “developing military bases with Turkish troops and sensitive equipment.”
“Israel established clear red lines about what it was willing to tolerate in Syria,” Ciddi said. “Deconfliction only works if parties implement the agreed upon rules.”
NETANYAHU WARNS TURKEY SHOULD NOT GET F-35S, CITING ERDOĞAN’S HOSTILITY TOWARD NATO ALLIES
Syria’s president Ahmed al-Sharaa and Turkey’s President Tayyip Erdoğan attend a joint press conference at the Presidential Palace in Ankara, Turkey, February 4, 2025. (Cagla Gurdogan/Reuters)
The dispute was already being discussed at senior levels before the strike. Mossad chief Roman Gofman spoke with al-Shaibani on Aug. 14, four days before the attack, according to three sources cited by Reuters. The conversation focused on Israel’s concerns about Turkey’s military presence in Syria, including potential troop deployments, weapons sales and drones supplied to the Syrian military.
Attempts to prevent an Israeli-Turkish clash are not new. Turkey and Israel began technical talks in Azerbaijan in 2025 aimed at preventing misunderstandings or military incidents in Syria. Turkey’s defense minister said in June 2025 that those contacts were continuing as Ankara trained and advised Syria’s military.
Ciddi argued that a mechanism alone would not prevent further Israeli action if Ankara continued pushing against what Jerusalem considers its security red lines.
Decommissioned Syrian air force planes are seen at the Abu Duhur military airbase east of Idlib, following the takeover of the area by Syrian opposition fighters on Dec. 7, 2024. (AP Photo/Omar Albam, File)
“To the extent that Ankara will push boundaries and attempt to position military capabilities that Israel feels is harmful to its safety, we are likely to see pre-emptive action by Jerusalem,” Ciddi said. “The ball is in Erdoğan’s court to not raise the temperature.”
Netanyahu is also facing criticism from inside Israel. Former Prime Minister Ehud Barak, a longtime Netanyahu adversary, accused the prime minister Wednesday of deliberately escalating tensions with Turkey for political purposes ahead of the Israeli election.
“Turkey is not Iran or Assad’s Syria,” Barak wrote in Hebrew on X, arguing that Israel’s strategic disputes with Ankara could be resolved, moderated or postponed through discreet diplomacy coordinated with the United States.
Turkish President Tayyip Erdoğan speaks during a rally in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in Istanbul, Turkey October 28, 2023. (Dilara Senkaya/Reuters)
News Outlet reached out to the White House, the Turkish Embassy in Washington, D.C., and Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz for comment.




