As the days roll by, it becomes increasingly clear that the Chancellor of the Exchequer is poised to break Labour’s manifesto promise of not raising income tax in the upcoming Budget later this month.

Should Rachel Reeves still hold the position of Chancellor—a possibility with even odds—she might find herself with little alternative.

The nation’s finances are facing a substantial deficit, largely attributed to Labour’s past actions, which is expanding at an alarming pace. One week it’s reported at £40 billion, and the next it’s ballooned to an astonishing £50 billion.

It’s no surprise that bond markets are growing nervous again, as evidenced by the recent uptick in gilt yields over the past few days.

I mentioned this in last week’s column, forecasting a significant tax shock in the Budget, similar to the one that hit UK businesses last year with an increase in employer National Insurance contributions.

I also speculated that this could involve breaking Labour’s manifesto, potentially through an increase in income tax.

Like many financial experts, I fear the cat is now firmly out of the bag. Income tax rises are coming our way, albeit with an ameliorating sweetener for workers.

In recent days, a combination of intelligence from informed sources, the evasive responses to questions on the likely manifesto breach from both the Prime Minister and Rachel Reeves, and other telling signals all point to higher income tax rates come April 6 next year.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer will, later this month in the Budget, break Labour ’s manifesto commitment not to increase income tax

Assuming the Chancellor survives the current demands for her resignation as a result of breaking rules on letting out her home in Dulwich, south London, any Budget income tax increase could well trigger another wave of calls for her to fall on her sword.

But if she delivers what Labour MPs really want from the Budget – more (not less) welfare spending, an increase in the minimum wage and higher taxes on the wealthy – she’ll probably survive.

My belief is that the Chancellor will brazen it out on Budget Day and state that, irrespective of the income tax rise, Labour’s overall commitment not to increase the tax burden of ‘workers’ remains 100 per cent intact. She’s good at half-truths.

She will argue this by announcing that the increase in income tax will be countered by an equivalent cut in employee National Insurance. As a result, some 30 million workers who pay both taxes will be no worse off.

The big tax hit will be on pensioners who don’t pay employee NI once they reach state pension age, even if they continue to work. Landlords and the self-employed will also be adversely affected.

The hand of Torsten Bell, pensions minister and Reeves’ influential Budget adviser, seems to be all over this plan to breach the manifesto.

Before becoming a Labour MP, Bell was head of the Resolution Foundation, a hard-Left think-tank that spends its days dreaming up ever new ways of turning the UK into a socialist state.

The big tax hit will be on pensioners who don’t pay employee NI once they reach state pension age, even if they continue to work. Landlords and the self-employed will also be adversely affected

So, more benefits for the low paid, higher taxes for the wealthy, and a quest to break the state pension triple lock.

Although Bell left the think-tank last year to stand as a Labour candidate in the General Election, he very much remains Mr Resolution Foundation.

And it is no coincidence that, just over a month ago, his former employer put out a document proposing exactly what the Chancellor is now planning: namely, a 2p rise in income tax offset by a 2p decrease in employee NI.

This would mean new income tax rates of 22 per cent (basic), 42 per cent (higher) and 47 per cent (additional).

Such a move, the foundation said, would raise a chunky £6 billion net for the Chancellor.

Explaining the rationale, ‘principal’ economist Adam Corlett said it was imperative that Reeves ‘should do all she can to avoid loading further pain on to workers’ pay packets’. 

He added: ‘She can do this by switching our tax base from employee National Insurance and on to income tax, which is paid by a far broader group in society.’

I know what many retired readers will think of this tax move – they will be absolutely horrified. 

They will see it as yet another punishing attack on their household finances, already undermined by high energy bills, persistent inflation and the continued freezing of the annual personal income tax allowance at £12,570.

The personal allowance has been set at £12,570 since April 2021, and Labour has given no indication that it is minded to defrost it in April 2028 when the current freeze is meant to end.

Indeed, it could be extended even further in the Budget.

In recent months I’ve lost count of the number of elderly readers who have contacted me complaining that their modest income is now being clobbered by tax.

Sadly, that tax hit will be even greater in April when those on the full ‘new’ state pension will start receiving payments of £12,548 a year as a result of a 4.8 per cent increase triggered by the triple lock. It will edge them ever closer to the personal allowance.

For those with top-up income from a company or self-invested personal pension, tax will become an issue, maybe for the first time in their retirement.

For Bell, higher taxes on the elderly will represent a personal victory: a counter to the triple lock, which he sees as unaffordable.

But he will also see this as a mere stepping stone. His next bold move, maybe to be made when he succeeds Reeves as Chancellor (Labour MPs love him more than Reeves), will be to dismantle the triple lock.

Of course, £6billion of extra tax won’t fill the nation’s black hole, but it is likely to bag the Chancellor far more revenue than any other tax-raising measure.

It’s why a raft of new taxes will sit alongside this likely income tax rise. They will probably include a mansion tax on £2million plus properties, a National Insurance attack on limited liability partnerships (used by accountants and lawyers), a clampdown on pension tax-free cash, a continued freezing of tax thresholds (alongside the personal allowance freeze), and a curtailment of gifts made to mitigate inheritance tax bills.

Whatever ends up in the Budget, it isn’t going to be fun for the vast majority of us. On the Chancellor’s behalf, I apologise – because you won’t get one from Reeves.

Tell me about your insurance quotes 

The days of soaring home and motor premiums seem to be over – for the time being at least.

As a result, fewer customers are shopping around at renewal.

While a minority go on to switch provider – a third in the case of motor cover and 36 per cent for home insurance – according to research company Consumer Intelligence, customers are staying put for a number of reasons.

These include their existing insurer being prepared to match a rival quote; not being able to find cheaper cover elsewhere; and a satisfactory claims experience from their current provider.

Is this how you see things? Have insurance providers suddenly become lovey-dovey? I’m sceptical. Do let me know, I’m all ears. Email me at: jeff. prestridge@mailonsunday.co.uk.

SAVE MONEY, MAKE MONEY

Sipp cashback

Sipp cashback

£200 when you deposit or transfer £15,000

4.53% cash Isa

4.53% cash Isa

Trading 212: 0.68% fixed 12-month bonus

£20 off motoring

£20 off motoring

This is Money Motoring Club voucher

Free shares bundle

Free shares bundle

Get free UK shares worth up to £200

4.45% Isa with bonus

4.45% Isa with bonus

Now with no penalty for withdrawals

Affiliate links: If you take out a product This is Money may earn a commission. These deals are chosen by our editorial team, as we think they are worth highlighting. This does not affect our editorial independence. Terms and conditions apply on all offers.