SCOTUS Allows ICE to Keep Arresting Illegals in Sanctuary City Los Angeles
Share this @internewscast.com

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to bypass a lower court’s decision. This earlier ruling had prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting federal immigration enforcement activities, citing these actions as racial profiling.

In July, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by then-President Joe Biden. She had stopped ICE from executing raids in the sanctuary area of Los Angeles, California.

Before the Trump administration sought SCOTUS’s intervention to let ICE persist in capturing illegal immigrants in Los Angeles during the legal proceedings, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had supported Frimpong’s decision.

On Monday, Justice Kavanaugh, representing the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision, stated that “the government has adequately demonstrated the need for a stay while the appeal is pending.”

Justice Kavanaugh emphasized that “stopping individuals based on reasonable suspicions of unlawful presence has long played a critical role in U.S. immigration enforcement efforts for decades, spanning multiple presidential terms.” With the current rise in illegal immigration under Biden, ICE’s attention on Los Angeles appears justified.

Kavanaugh further noted, “Individuals in the country illegally seeking to avoid law enforcement questioning are essentially aiming to bypass the law, which does not constitute a significant legal interest.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sotomayor, in writing a dissenting opinion that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined, called the court’s stay on the lower court’s decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor writes. “Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent.”

The case is Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, No. 25A169 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Surviving Behind Bars: Harrowing Stories from Victims of Maduro’s Regime

Ivan Colmenares Garcia, a Colombian lawyer, faced a harrowing ordeal when he…

Concerns Rise Over US Response to Russia’s Actions in Kyiv Following Maduro’s Arrest

Concerns are mounting over the possibility that Donald Trump might enable Vladimir…

Unveiling Australia’s Most Notorious Workplace: Is This the Worst Job Environment Down Under?

A Sydney bakery owner has faced severe criticism from a judge after…

76-Year-Old Faces Death Penalty for Horrific Crime Involving 5-Year-Old and Alligators

A Florida man, responsible for the abduction and tragic death of a…

Albanian Burglary Syndicate Confesses to £1 Million Mansion Heists Across the UK

An Albanian criminal group has confessed to a series of £1 million…

Jennifer Garner Opens Up About the Challenges of Her Divorce from Ben Affleck in Rare Remarks

In a rare public reflection, Jennifer Garner has opened up about her…

Jack Black Regrets Missing Out on Iconic Movie Role: Find Out Which One!

Jack Black has recently opened up about a decision in his career…

Nick Reiner’s Unexpected Courtroom Twist: Lawyer Steps Down Amid Proceedings

In a courtroom filled with tension today, Nick Reiner displayed an unsettling…

Tom Leonard Warns: The Unstoppable Power of the Scarlet Witch

Nicolas Maduro’s wife, Cilia Flores, often portrayed herself as a champion of…

Double Elimination Shakes Up Season 14 Premiere of The Masked Singer

The Masked Singer made a splashy return on Wednesday night, kicking off…

Shooting Incident Leaves Several Injured Outside Salt Lake City Church

A tragic shooting outside a Mormon church in Utah resulted in the…

Anthony Joshua’s Shock Hospital Call After Unexpected Car Crash: What Happened?

A UFC star has shared an emotional exchange he had with Anthony…