SCOTUS Allows ICE to Keep Arresting Illegals in Sanctuary City Los Angeles
Share this @internewscast.com

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to bypass a lower court’s decision. This earlier ruling had prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting federal immigration enforcement activities, citing these actions as racial profiling.

In July, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by then-President Joe Biden. She had stopped ICE from executing raids in the sanctuary area of Los Angeles, California.

Before the Trump administration sought SCOTUS’s intervention to let ICE persist in capturing illegal immigrants in Los Angeles during the legal proceedings, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had supported Frimpong’s decision.

On Monday, Justice Kavanaugh, representing the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision, stated that “the government has adequately demonstrated the need for a stay while the appeal is pending.”

Justice Kavanaugh emphasized that “stopping individuals based on reasonable suspicions of unlawful presence has long played a critical role in U.S. immigration enforcement efforts for decades, spanning multiple presidential terms.” With the current rise in illegal immigration under Biden, ICE’s attention on Los Angeles appears justified.

Kavanaugh further noted, “Individuals in the country illegally seeking to avoid law enforcement questioning are essentially aiming to bypass the law, which does not constitute a significant legal interest.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sotomayor, in writing a dissenting opinion that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined, called the court’s stay on the lower court’s decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor writes. “Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent.”

The case is Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, No. 25A169 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Detectives Interview Officer Allegedly Involved in Andrew’s Request for Information on Virginia

A former royal protection officer, now retired and central to the Prince…

Tragic Incident: Man Accused of Strangling Girlfriend and Setting Fire to Home with Newborn Inside

Tragedy has struck in New York as a woman and her newborn…

Stephen Fry Reportedly Distances Himself from J.K. Rowling Regarding Dumbledore Role in HBO Series

Sir Stephen Fry, recently eliminated from Celebrity Traitors, is now in the…

Social Media Entrepreneur Asserts: ‘No Face, No Case

In a striking scene of defiance, a prominent community figure was heard…

Exclusive New Jersey Generals Jacket Once Owned by Donald Trump Hits the Auction Block

A white satin jacket that belonged to Donald Trump during his ownership…

Bill Maher Uncovers the Hidden Message Behind Trump’s White House Makeover

Bill Maher has voiced his concerns over the recent renovations at the…

Tragic Final Days of Three-Year-Old Boy Fatally Injured in Car Accident

A tragic car accident has claimed the life of a three-year-old boy,…

Demi Moore Opens Up About Overcoming Challenges and Discomfort During ‘Striptease’ Filming

Demi Moore recently shared insights into the commitment required for her role…

Former Teammate Reveals Strategic Plan Existed Before Nick Mangold’s Untimely Passing at 41

The New York Jets community is in shock following the unexpected passing…

Heartfelt Tribute: 9-1-1 Nashville Honors the Legacy of Isabelle Adora Tate at 23

Actress Isabelle Adora Tate will be fondly remembered by the television show…

Historic Art School Faces Financial Challenges, Sells Property to Stay Afloat

An esteemed art institution in San Francisco is taking significant steps to…

Controversial Pet Tax Increase Sparks Debate in Australia: One State’s Bold Move

The Victorian government is set to double the pet registration fees it…