Share this @internewscast.com

“Get me off this merry-go-round from hell,” expressed Councilwoman Monica Rodriguez with fervor during the Housing and Homelessness Committee meeting on Wednesday. Her poignant words highlighted the frustration felt by Los Angeles officials as they grappled with a pivotal decision: should the city sever ties with the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA)?
Despite investing over $1 billion annually into homelessness initiatives, Los Angeles continues to see the crisis escalate, leaving many to question the effectiveness of the current system.
Rodriguez, speaking with the authority of someone who has dedicated seven years to the committee, described the city’s approach as a convoluted mess. She criticized the fragmented nature of responsibilities, which are divided among the mayor’s office, city council offices, the Housing Department, and LAHSA.
“We still have a broken and dysfunctional system without a singular entity directing our work around homelessness,” Rodriguez asserted, underscoring the lack of cohesive leadership in tackling this pressing issue.
Using a vivid metaphor, she likened the situation to a hostess managing restaurant reservations without any available tables, illustrating the futility and chaos of the current system.
“It’s the equivalent of a hostess taking everyone’s reservation at a restaurant with no tables available,” Rodriguez said.
After hours of debate, the committee postponed the decision until next week while staff prepares additional reports outlining possible paths forward.
Rodriguez introduced a motion calling for the city to examine consolidating its homelessness response under a single department back in 2023. That report took ten months to produce.
Los Angeles County has already started pulling away from LAHSA and created its own homelessness and housing department, forcing City Hall to confront whether it should remain tied to the regional agency.
Rodriguez is calling for a 30-day report outlining a five-year plan to build out a new Bureau of Homelessness within the Los Angeles Housing Department, including staffing, contract oversight and coordination with the county.
But the committee faces a political and operational dilemma. The panel is chaired by Councilwoman Nithya Raman, who has led the committee since taking office and is a mayoral candidate.
Raman said the issue is more complicated than simply cutting ties with LAHSA.
The agency still applies for federal homelessness funding, runs the annual homeless count and manages the region’s data systems tracking services.
Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters
California Post News: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, YouTube, WhatsApp, LinkedIn
California Post Sports Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X
California Post Opinion
California Post Newsletters: Sign up here!
California Post App: Download here!
Home delivery: Sign up here!
Page Six Hollywood: Sign up here!
At the same time, Raman acknowledged the city spends more than $1 billion annually on homelessness programs while lacking a clear structure to measure results.
“We need to be able to say who is responsible,” Raman said.
City analysts outlined several paths forward: tighten the city’s partnership with LAHSA, contract directly with Los Angeles County, or build a new city-run system capable of managing homelessness programs itself.
None are simple.
Creating a new department could require hundreds of staff and years to build. Contracting with the county would require complex negotiations. Staying with LAHSA would require dramatically stronger oversight.
Mayor Karen Bass urged caution. In a statement Wednesday, Bass warned that cutting ties with LAHSA too quickly could destabilize services for vulnerable residents.
“Withdrawing from LAHSA too quickly, without a plan and without the capacity, will no doubt cause unintended consequences that will leave more Angelenos to die on our streets,” Bass said.
Bass also warned that the county’s move to create its own department has opened a $300 million gap in the regional homelessness system while state and federal funding shrink.
For Rodriguez, however, the bigger danger is delay. “We’ve wasted precious time,” she said.