In Minnesota, a group of concerned citizens is urgently appealing to a federal judge to halt what they describe as the Trump administration’s unconstitutional retaliation against peaceful protesters and observers involved in immigration enforcement operations. This plea follows a tragic incident involving the fatal shooting of a Minneapolis resident, which the group cites as a compelling reason for immediate action.

The plaintiffs’ attorneys emphasized in a recent filing that Minnesotans exercising their constitutional rights to free speech and assembly are being subjected to unconstitutional violence by federal agents. This includes incidents of unwarranted pepper spraying and baseless arrests, which occur daily, according to their claims.

The initial complaint was lodged against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its leaders on December 17, following the federal government’s initiation of “Operation Metro Surge” in Minnesota. The plaintiffs argue that the defendants’ harsh and often unlawful immigration enforcement tactics have galvanized protestors and observers, who have consequently faced retaliatory violence, seizures, and arrests.

To counter these alleged retaliatory actions, the group has requested a temporary restraining order (TRO) in federal court. U.S. District Judge Kate Menendez, responding to the government’s request, reclassified this motion as a preliminary injunction. This adjustment provides the government with additional time to address the allegations.

In a recent opposition brief, the government contested the citizens’ allegations, describing them as isolated incidents with no immediate threat of irreparable harm to peaceful demonstrators and observers. However, the plaintiffs refute this, arguing that the government’s assurances are not accurate.

As the new filing from the plaintiffs puts it, “[t]he government’s claims were not true.”

“The very same day that the government’s brief was filed, reports emerged that the government was deploying an additional two thousand federal agents to Minnesota,” their lawyers wrote. “Two days after that, an ICE agent shot and killed observer Renee Good while she was driving away from agents who were attempting to force their way into her vehicle.”

“And things appear to be getting worse, not better: even more federal agents are being deployed to Minnesota at this very moment,” they added.

The protesters’ and observers’ lawyers continued, urging Menendez, a Joe Biden appointee, to grant a TRO given the new “extraordinary circumstances.”

In sum, Defendants’ heightened presence in this District is not only ongoing—it’s intensifying. And with intensified federal law enforcement efforts in Minnesota come increased gatherings of people to protest and bear witness to what is happening to our community. There is an immediate need for the entry of a temporary restraining order to preclude the government from continuing to violate the First and Fourth Amendment rights of these brave individuals. That order can and should enter while the government’s investigation and further process related to a preliminary injunction continue. These are precisely the sorts of “extraordinary circumstances” premised on new evidence that a motion for reconsideration exists to remedy.

Good, 37, was shot and killed on Wednesday by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent as she drove her Honda Pilot away from officers and refused orders to get out of the vehicle. Her death has resulted in a firestorm of fury from citizens in Minnesota and across the U.S.

The Trump administration has defended the ICE agent’s actions, with Vice President JD Vance suggesting she was part of a “broader left wing network” that used “domestic terror techniques” to target federal agents and Attorney General Pam Bondi warning, “Do not test our resolve.”

A day after Good was killed, a Customs and Border Protection agent shot two people in Portland, Oregon, with federal authorities saying the individuals tried to run federal officers over.