Share this @internewscast.com
Attorneys made a late Friday submission to Manhattan’s federal court, aiming to prevent the disclosure of documents from a civil defamation lawsuit settled years ago. This case, initiated by the late Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, dates back a decade.
The Department of Justice has recently requested that a judge remove confidentiality constraints from these documents.
The documents in question reportedly encompass transcripts from over 30 depositions, alongside sensitive financial and sexual information concerning Maxwell and others.
Previously, some materials from the year-long evidence exchange in the lawsuit had been made public following a directive from a federal appeals court.
Maxwell’s legal team argues that a law enacted by Congress last December, which mandates the release of millions of Epstein-related files, breaches the Constitution’s separation of powers principle.
“Congress cannot, by statute, strip this Court of the power or relieve it of the responsibility to protect its files from misuse. To do so violates the separation of powers,” stated attorneys Laura Menninger and Jeffrey Pagliuca in reference to the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
âUnder the Constitutionâs separation of powers, neither Congress nor the Executive Branch may intrude on the judicial power.
“That power includes the power to definitively and finally resolve cases and disputes,â the lawyers added.
The release of Epstein-related documents from criminal probes that began weeks ago has resulted in new revelations about Epstein’s decades-long sexual abuse of women and teenage girls.
Some victims have complained that their names and personal information were revealed in documents while the names of their abusers were blacked out.
Members of Congress have complained that only about half of existing documents, many with redactions, have been made public even as DOJ officials have said everything has been released, except for some files that can’t be made public until a judge gives the go-ahead.
Giuffre said Epstein had trafficked her to other men, including the former Prince Andrew, now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
She sued Mountbatten-Windsor in 2021, claiming that they had sex when she was 17.
He denied her claims and the two settled the lawsuit in 2022.
Days ago, he was arrested and held in custody for nearly 11 hours on suspicion of misconduct in having shared confidential trade information with Epstein.
In a memoir published after she killed herself last year, Giuffre wrote that prosecutors told her they didnât include her in the sex trafficking prosecution of Maxwell because they didnât want her allegations to distract the jury.
Maxwell, 64, was convicted in December 2021 and sentenced to 20 years in prison.
Epstein took his own life in a federal lockup in August 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges.
Maxwell was moved from a federal prison in Florida to a low-security prison camp in Texas last summer after she participated in two days of interviews with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.
Two weeks ago, she declined to answer questions from House Oversight Committee lawmakers in a deposition conducted in a a video call to her federal prison camp, though she indicated through a statement from her lawyer that she was âprepared to speak fully and honestlyâ if granted clemency.
The DOJ did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Saturday.
NEVER MISS A STORY: Get your breaking news and exclusive stories first by following us across all platforms.