A federal judge in Arizona has determined that the requirement for sex offenders to remain on the state’s registry for their entire lives is not a violation of their rights.

Judge Stephen McNamee of the U.S. District Court concluded that the state’s laws mandating lifelong registration for sex offenders, along with the obligation to report any changes in residence or online identifiers, are constitutional. According to the Phoenix-based judge, these measures fall within the government’s authority.

“It is evident that Arizona has a compelling governmental interest in safeguarding children and preventing repeat offenses by sex offenders,” McNamee stated.

The ruling issued on November 6 represents a significant victory for the lawmakers who supported these regulations, including Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen. He hailed the decision as a “victory for every parent in Arizona.”

Petersen also criticized his political opponent, state Attorney General Kris Mayes, whom he intends to challenge in the 2026 election. He accused her of neglecting her duty to defend the state’s position and “abandoning the state’s responsibility to protect communities.”

“When the Attorney General failed to defend Arizona’s public safety laws, we took a stand to ensure the safety of our children was not compromised,” Petersen remarked. “This ruling clarifies that monitoring convicted sex offenders is not only constitutional but essential to protect families and prevent further victimization.”

The lawsuit was filed by an Arizona resident listed as “Level One” on the sex offender registry, denoting that he is of the lowest risk of three possible levels. The man, who was granted anonymity and thus referred to as John Doe, pleaded guilty in 2016 to several crimes, including attempted sexual conduct with a minor under 15.

Doe argued several of his constitutional rights have been violated by the laws, including his 14th Amendment right to due process. He argued that the lifetime registration requirement is unconstitutional, as he cannot contest the requirement, and that it is unnecessary as he poses a low risk of recidivism because he is a “Level One” offender.

McNamee dismissed this argument, noting that Doe already got to contest his status before he was convicted of his crimes.

Petersen and Arizona House Speaker Steve Montenegro intervened as defendants in the case when they filed a motion to intervene. The judge ruled in their favor, despite Doe’s claim that his First Amendment rights were violated because of his need to disclose his internet identifiers.

The defendants, McNamee said, “have met their burden of showing that Arizona’s internet identifier reporting requirements do not burden substantially more speech than necessary to further Arizona’s goal of protecting children and reducing sex offender recidivism.” Furthermore, the judge wrote, “Arizona’s internet identifier reporting requirements do not bar Doe from engaging in online discourse.”

According to Arizona Mirror, a related legal challenge is being considered in the state. Several people have sued after lawmakers in 2024 expanded the number of people posted to the state’s sex offender website and required sex offenders with children to disclose their children’s names and schools.