Share this @internewscast.com

Jason T. Harris (WDIV screenshot)

Jason T. Harris (WDIV screenshot)

An appeals court in Michigan has upheld the murder conviction of a man who killed his wife by intentionally spiking her cereal with a lethal dose of heroin just months after their second child was born. A three-judge panel of the State of Michigan Court of Appeals on Friday unanimously rejected the request of Jason T. Harris to have his conviction overturned due to ineffective assistance of counsel, reasoning that there was “overwhelming evidence” of his guilt and the “sheer fiendishness of his actions.”

As previously reported by Law&Crime, a jury in November 2021 found Harris guilty on one count each of first-degree murder, solicitation of murder, and delivery of a controlled substance resulting in death for causing Christina Ann-Thompson’s 2014 overdose.

The appeals court

According to the court’s opinion, Harris’ defense attorney made a critical error by not consulting or calling a toxicology expert to refute the state’s evidence showing Harris’ wife orally ingested a fatal amount of heroin.

“By not consulting an expert (or conducting any independent investigation into the basis for the prosecution’s expert’s testimony), Harris’s lawyer remained unaware of the possibility of either presenting his own witness to counter the prosecution’s experts or cross-examining the prosecution’s witnesses based upon information he learned from either an independent investigation or the consultation with his own expert,” the opinion states. “We conclude that his decision was objectively unreasonable.”

However, the panel further reasoned that despite his attorney’s error, Harris failed to establish that there was a “reasonable probability” the jury would have found him not guilty, which is the standard for overturning a conviction based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The panel concluded that while such evidence could “possibly have affected the jury verdict,” the “overwhelming evidence of guilt and the sheer fiendishness” of Harris’ actions meant there was not a “reasonable probability” that the jury was likely to reach a different conclusion.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Karen Read Murder Trial: Trooper Indicates a Cocktail Glass May Have Been the Weapon in the Death of Boston Officer John O’Keefe

A sergeant with the Massachusetts State Police, who played a crucial role…

Grandmother Charged with Murder of Her Grandsons After Their Tragic Discovery

The grandmother of two boys who were found dead at a home…

Man Breaks Into Parents’ Home, Uses Crossbow on Mom, Claims Defense of His Cat

An Arkansas man has been arrested and is awaiting trial after he…

Authorities Request Assistance in Locating Missing 15-Year-Old Utah Girl; $20K Reward Available

Police in Utah are seeking the public’s assistance in finding a 15-year-old…

Home Nurse Accused of Abusive Behavior Toward Patient: Police Report

Nia Ayers (St. Cloud Police Department) A home health nurse in Florida…

Teen Causes Fatal Crash That Splits Car in Two, Police Say

Left: Alberto Oswaldo Yanez Quintana (Broward County (Fla.) Sheriff’s Office). Right: Image…

Ex-NFL Player Admits to Killing Girlfriend in Court Guilty Plea

Kevin Ware (Montomgery County Jail); Taylor Pomaski (Texas EquuSearch). A former NFL…

Lockdown ends after gunfire incident on Queensland highway

Police have lifted an emergency warning for locals on the Sunshine Coast…

Gainesville Woman Accused of Sneaking Marijuana into Jail Using Menstrual Pad

Staff report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Monique Simoune Curtis, 28, was detained on…

Judge Temporarily Blocks Order to Bring Back Second Man Deported in Error

President Donald Trump leaves after signing an executive order at an event…

Attorney General Seeks to Stop Trump’s Tariffs, Claiming They ‘Caused Chaos’

US President Donald Trump sits during his meeting with NATO Secretary General…

Court Hints at Possible Victory for Trump in Defunding Case

President Donald Trump observes as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent takes part in…