Mike Lindell heads into defamation trial planning to testify
Share this @internewscast.com

Mike Lindell listens during an interview at the podium in the White House press briefing room on Friday, Feb. 21, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

This week, MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell is entering his billion-dollar defamation trial with confidence, stating in interviews that he intends to testify and “tell the truth,” asserting, “I’m not going to incriminate myself! I’ve done nothing wrong.”

The 63-year-old Lindell is being sued in federal court by Dominion Voting Systems after he allegedly “maliciously spread false claims” and accused the company of “rigging the 2020 presidential election,” as stated by Dominion officials. Jury selection was slated to begin on Monday, according to Colorado Politics, with U.S. District Judge Nina Wang — appointed by Joe Biden — presiding over the case in Denver, Colorado.

“If any attorney advised me not to testify or to take a deal, I’d tell them: ‘Never!”” Lindell told Rolling Stone last week.

“I speak the truth,” Lindell insisted. “I’ve been in many courts in my life, and ‘don’t testify’ is what they tell the guilty people, in my mind.”

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

Lindell appeared on Steve Bannon‘s “War Room” podcast on Sunday and joked about brandishing one of his famous pillows after a lawyer in the case called them “lumpy” in a past interview.

“I told my lawyers, maybe I should bring him one inside,” Lindell said.

The case made headlines in April after Wang issued a scathing rebuke of Lindell for submitting a court filing allegedly rife with errors because his attorney allegedly used a generative artificial intelligence program, citing several court cases that don’t exist.

“These defects include but are not limited to misquotes of cited cases; misrepresentations of principles of law associated with cited cases, including discussions of legal principles that simply do not appear within such decisions; misstatements regarding whether case law originated from a binding authority such as the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; misattributions of case law to this District; and most egregiously, citation of cases that do not exist,” Wang blasted.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Pastor Who Survived Mushroom Poisoning Makes Inspirational Return to Church

Two weeks on from Erin Patterson being found guilty of the mushroom…

Authorities Report: 21-Year-Old Shoots Woman Walking Dogs with Partner

Inset: A California woman, pictured in San Leandro, was enjoying a walk…

Father Impregnates Daughter Resulting in Miscarriage at Walmart: DA Reports

Jerry Lee Martinez (KIII). Authorities in Texas report that a father committed…

Lawyer Sentenced to Prison for Involvement in Art Dealer’s Murder

David Replogle (Riverside County Prosecutor”s Office). A 76-year-old lawyer has been sentenced…

Florida Woman Accused of Stealing Expensive Watches from Tourists

Esther Torres (Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center). A Florida woman has been…

Individual Accused of Assaulting and Threatening Officers Following Arrest for Disorderly Intoxication Downtown

Staff report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Early this morning, 37-year-old Robert Wayne Masey…