Trump admin asks court not to unseal Abrego Garcia documents
Share this @internewscast.com

President Donald Trump pauses as he speaks in the Oval Office of the White House, Tuesday, May 20, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

On Wednesday, the Trump administration requested that a federal judge restrict media access to information concerning Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident who was “wrongfully” deported to El Salvador against court orders.

In a 16-page motion, Department of Justice attorneys opposed an unsealing request filed by several media outlets earlier this month.

The legal document states, “The Court sealed highly sensitive records to protect their confidentiality and prevent significant harm if leaked. Intervenors wish to access and likely distribute these documents. Neither the First Amendment nor common law grants them such rights.”

This issue highlights an ongoing theme in the Abrego Garcia case: starting in late April, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis has permitted documents to be filed confidentially.

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

The government, for its part, has been happily keeping certain information under wraps. But, while initially at least modestly supportive, Abrego Garcia’s attorneys and the court itself have grown increasingly skeptical of the need to sustain the regime of secrecy.

On May 6, a coalition of media groups led by Dow Jones, the company that publishes the Wall Street Journal, petitioned the court to intervene and asked the judge to publicize “certain court records” dating back to the first sealed filing — a joint submission — in the case.

“The eyes of the public and all three branches of government are on this lawsuit: in the weeks since it was filed, the case has already been before the U.S. Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit (twice), the President has discussed it during a nationally televised interview and on social media, and members of Congress have traveled internationally to meet Plaintiff Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia and investigate the conditions of his detention,” the media motion notes. “The case raises profound questions of separation of powers, civil liberties, and foreign relations.”

The coalition suggested a broad sphere of silence enabled by the court, even including notice of hearings in the high-profile case.

“[T]he parties began filing submissions in this matter under seal — seemingly without requesting or receiving permission from the Court to do so,” the media motion goes on. “First, the parties jointly filed a sealed request for a conference with the Court. Then, the government filed a sealed motion, and Plaintiffs filed a sealed response. Finally, last week, the government filed another sealed motion which was denied ‘[f]or the reasons stated on the record during today’s proceeding’ despite no hearing being noticed on the docket or appearing on the Court’s calendar.”

In their filing, the media outlets argued that the long-standing common-law presumption of access to court records should decide the issue.

Attorneys representing Abrego Garcia said they took no position on the request and would defer to whatever the court decided, but asked that some personally identifying information be redacted in the event anything was unsealed.

The Trump administration, on the other hand, rubbished the coalition’s unsealing request as “efforts to pry into highly sensitive matters” that lack any basis in the law or the U.S. Constitution.

“The default presumption of access is subject to a balancing test in which access may be denied if, as is the case here, a countervailing interest overcomes it,” the government’s motion reads. “As courts have consistently recognized, there is no more compelling or substantial interest the United States possesses than protection of national security and classified information.”

The DOJ goes on to argue that even “sensitive but non-classified information” should remain under lock and key because its release might “adversely affect the outcome of the case.”

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Two Sentenced for $80 Million Drug Scheme Involving Coffee Grinder Meth Production

A young man lured with $50,000 to pay off gambling debts will…

Trump Administration Concedes Deportation of Abrego Garcia Was an ‘Error’

Main: President Donald Trump talks to the press while signing executive orders…

“Father Takes Action: Kills Newly-Released Sex Offender to Protect Young Relative”

An Indiana resident faces murder charges following the fatal shooting of a…

Shocking Verdict on Jeffrey Epstein’s Death and ‘Client List’

After months of touting the impending release of new, blockbuster information on…

What We Know About Erin Patterson So Far

She is the woman at the centre of the trial that made…

Man Allegedly Attacked by Pokemon Fans While Waiting in Line: Police Report

Share copy link The GameStop location in Colma, Calif. (Google Maps). Two…

Trump Appeals After Losing Central Park Five Lawsuit

Presidential candidates Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are shown during a segment…

Lawyers for Mike Lindell face penalties for submitting a document created by artificial intelligence

Main: Mike Lindell gestures with a thumbs up while attending a rally…
Musician R. Kelly is currently serving a 30-year prison term following his…

Attorney Raises Serious Questions About Legality of Raid in Alan Jones Sexual Abuse Case

Alan Jones has “grave concerns” about the legality of a police raid…

Police Discover 4-Year-Old Boy Sitting in Dog Crate During Family Dinner

Left: Patricia L. Siercks. Right: Joshua J. Gusman (Henry County Jail). In…

Mother Tragically Kills 4-Year-Old Son, Believing He Was Possessed

On Friday, an Illinois woman allegedly stabbed three of her children —…