Appeals court temporarily lifts judge’s block on Trump’s National Guard deployment 
Share this @internewscast.com


A federal appeals court panel late Thursday temporarily lifted a judge’s order ruling President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard illegal, enabling the troops to remain assisting with immigration raids in Los Angeles, for now. 

The ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals landed mere hours after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the president to return control of the troops to California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) by Friday afternoon. 

The three-judge appeals panel is comprised of two Trump-nominated judges, Mark Bennett and Eric Miller, and Judge Jennifer Sung, an appointee of former President Biden. 

Their one-page order contained little explanation but suggests it is not a decision on the merits of the case in any way. 

Breyer, an appointee of former President Clinton who serves in San Francisco, said Trump failed to issue his order “through” Newsom as required by law and the situation on the ground didn’t present the prerequisites required for Trump to federalize the National Guard. 

“The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of ‘rebellion,’” Breyer wrote. 

His order was set to go into effect Friday afternoon. 

The Trump administration in urging the 9th Circuit to immediately intervene called the judge’s order “unprecedented” and an “extraordinary intrusion” into Trump’s authority. 

“That sort of second-guessing of the Commander in Chief’s military judgments is a gross violation of the separation of powers,” the Justice Department wrote in its motion. “Nearly 200 years ago, the Supreme Court made clear that these judgment calls are for the President to make—not a Governor, and certainly not a federal court.” 

The 9th Circuit issued its ruling before Newsom responded. His opposition was filed six minutes after the order. 

“An administrative stay is unnecessary and unwarranted in light of the district court’s extensive reasoning— in particular, its findings of irreparable harm to the State in the absence of injunctive relief. There are also serious questions regarding the appellate jurisdiction of this Court,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s (D) office wrote. 

Updated at 11:45 p.m. EDT.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Breaking News: Over 25 Lives Lost in Iranian Airstrikes Amidst Approaching Trump Deadline

Over the past weekend, a series of devastating strikes shook cities throughout…

Revolutionary Snail Solution: Experts Unveil Nature’s Secret Weapon Against Florida’s Invasive Crisis

ORLANDO, Fla. – For many Floridians, the sight of unsightly algal blooms…

Trump’s Endorsement of Steven Hilton Shakes Up California Governor Race: A Game-Changer for Republicans

LOS ANGELES – In a strategic move that could reshape the political…

Reckless Driving in Hillsborough: Apopka Man Charged After Shocking Crash Injures Motorcyclist

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, Fla. – A man from Apopka found himself in legal…

Gate City Welfare Check Unveils Shocking Malicious Wounding and Drug Charges Against Local Resident

A Sullivan County resident found himself in custody this past Sunday following…

Hawkins Co. Rescue Squad Boosts Emergency Response with TVA Grant

ROGERSVILLE, Tenn. (WJHL) – The Hawkins County Rescue Squad (HCRS) has boosted…

Urgent Alert: Central Florida Faces Imminent Flood Threat – Stay Prepared!

ORLANDO, Fla. – A flood watch is currently in place for Volusia…

Damascus Resident Arrested for Alleged Involvement in Child Pornography Case

In Abingdon, Virginia, a significant development unfolded as authorities took decisive action…

Central Florida Braces for Another Round of Storms: What to Expect Next

ORLANDO, Fla. – Central Florida can expect a continuation of much-needed rainfall…