Appeals court rules against Trump in birthright citizenship battle
Share this @internewscast.com

(The Hill) — A federal appeals court ruled against President Trump on Friday, barring the administration from ending birthright citizenship.

A three-judge panel from the First Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld an injunction from a district court, which prevents the administration from implementing a presidential executive order from January aimed at restricting birthright citizenship.

The court expressed caution in its extensive 100-page opinion, stating, “Historical lessons urge us to be cautious about endorsing this latest attempt to depart from the long-standing tradition of recognizing birthright citizenship, making it contingent upon a parent’s actions, instead of the straightforward fact of being born on U.S. soil, except in the rarest cases.”

Boston’s federal appeals court is the newest judicial body to challenge the president’s initiative to terminate birthright citizenship, affirming that this principle grants citizenship to anyone born in the U.S., irrespective of their parents’ immigration status, and is probably unlawful.

The court’s chief judge noted in the ruling, “Our nation’s history of attempts to limit birthright citizenship—from the Dred Scott decision prior to the Civil War to the rationale behind the Chinese Exclusion Act case, Wong Kim Ark—has been less than honorable.”

This latest appellate court ruling is the fifth to either deliver or support directives blocking Trump’s order since June, part of his extensive immigration reforms since reassuming the presidency.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta welcomed the ruling in a post online.

On social platform X, Bonta commented, “Today’s ruling sustains a nationwide injunction in our lawsuit against the President’s bid to eliminate, by merely signing a document, the constitutional right to birthright citizenship.”

He added, “We will continue to oppose this executive order until the President’s attempt to unmake the Constitution is blocked completely.”

The Golden State was among the 20 states included in the lawsuit.

Late last month, the Department of Justice asked the Supreme Court to review whether Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship is constitutional. 

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Rebranding César Chavez Day: A Passionate and Urgent Movement Gains Momentum Nationwide

Across the United States, from California to Minnesota, elected officials and civil…

Johnson City Animal Shelter Hosts Inaugural ‘Cruising For A Cause’ Car Show with Over 100 Vehicles in Washington County

The Washington County Johnson City Animal Shelter in Tennessee revved up excitement…

Pope Leo XIV Honors Pope Francis’ Legacy During Holy Week’s Palm Sunday Observance

In a momentous gathering at St. Peter’s Square in Rome, Pope Leo…

Iran’s Fiery Warning: US Ground Troops Face Dire Threats in Escalating Tensions

In a bold and fiery statement, Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf,…

Derby Car Collision: Man Arrested After Vehicle Injures Seven Pedestrians in UK

Forensic investigators work on the scene in Friar Gate, Derby, Sunday March…

Adventurous Kangaroo Chesney Escapes Zoo and Roams Free for Three Days

How does a kangaroo break out of a petting zoo? No, it’s…

Viral Pro-Iran Memes Challenge Trump in Online Propaganda Battle

The ongoing conflict with Iran is proving to be unprecedented in terms…

NASA’s Artemis Program Redefines Space Exploration: Expanding Opportunities Beyond Apollo Era

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, Fla – Before the roar of rockets and the…

Honoring Heroes: Join the American Legion’s Vietnam Veterans Day Ceremony This Sunday

On Sunday afternoon, the Kings Mountain Post 24 of the American Legion…

Kosovo Faces Economic Strain as Rising Fuel Costs Hit Hard Amid Middle East Tensions

PRISTINA – Kushtrim Ajvazi takes pride in contributing to the success of…