New study shows 72% of Illinois wetlands not federally protected
Share this @internewscast.com

URBANA, Ill. (WCIA) — A new study from the U of I says more than 70% of Illinois wetlands are not federally protected.

Despite this, one local expert talked about the types of benefits these areas provide.

“We have radically remade the land and water in Illinois,” said Prairie River Network Water Policy Director Robert Hirschfeld.

One of these areas is Busey Woods in Champaign County, with others located throughout Central Illinois. However, following a 2023 Supreme Court ruling, a significant portion of these lands lost the protection they previously had under the 1972 Clean Water Act, which experts warn could lead to a series of issues.

“We’ve already lost so many of our historic wetlands,” Hirschfeld said. “Only about 10% remain.”

Much of which have turned into farmland, which he said is already affecting Illinois.

“The amount of flood protection that wetlands provide, you know, it’s hundreds of millions of dollars in Illinois alone annually,” Hirschfeld said.

He said they also help filter drinking water, take in tons of carbon and provide a much-needed habitat for wildlife.

“A lot of endangered and threatened species make their homes in wetlands,” Hirschfeld said.

A study posted this month by the U of I said 72% of the state’s remaining wetlands are not protected under the Clean Water Act.

“Wetlands that have already been drained or destroyed aren’t affected here, regardless of whether it’s federal or state law, because what’s done is done,” Hirschfeld explained. “Our focus must be on safeguarding what still exists.”

Hirschfeld and the Prairie River team have already developed a strategy. They’re advocating for the State Wetlands Protection Law, which would enable the state to maintain the protective role traditionally held by the federal government.

“Wetlands would be categorized according to their size and ecological importance,” Hirschfeld stated. “Based on this classification, you’d receive a permit. If permitted to fill a wetland, you would be required to mitigate the impact.”

With one clear exception.

“Given the extensive land used for farming and agriculture’s significant role in the economy, the proposed state legislation explicitly exempts standard farming activities,” Hirschfeld noted.

He said the bill will most likely get a big push and be discussed in the spring legislative session.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Hong Kong vs. Maersk: Explosive Arbitration Battle Unveiled Over Panama Port Allegations

HONG KONG – A branch of a Hong Kong-based corporate giant has…

Vietnam Veteran Fatally Shot in Standoff with Polk County Deputies, Reports Sheriff

An alarming incident unfolded in Polk County, Florida, when a veteran was…

Power Outages Loom as Tensions Rise: How Iranians Brace for Impact Ahead of Trump’s Deadline

In the bustling city of Tehran, Asghar Hashemi finds himself tethered to…

Shocking Scandal: Louisville Deacon Arrested for Alleged Sex Crimes – What You Need to Know

A Louisville resident has been charged following allegations of sexual assault involving…

Texas Launches Major Investigation into Camp Mystic as License Renewal Hangs in Balance

AUSTIN, Texas – In a significant development, health authorities in Texas have…

Bristol, TN City Council Greenlights Kings College Rezoning: A Unified Decision for Community Growth

BRISTOL, Tenn. — The Bristol City Council convened on Tuesday evening to…

Brevard County Commissioner Katie Delaney Announces May Resignation Amid Family Relocation

BREVARD COUNTY, Fla. – Katie Delaney, a prominent North Brevard County commissioner…