Texas bill targets abortion pills, $100K penalty for distributors
Share this @internewscast.com


DALLAS () Texas Republicans are pushing a new bill targeting abortion pills they say would be nearly impossible to overturn.

Senate Bill 2880, which passed in the Senate last week, allows individuals to sue anyone who manufactures, distributes, mails, prescribes or provides abortion-inducing drugs, with potential penalties of up to $100,000. It also expands the state’s wrongful death statute.

Supporters of the legislation say it’s intended to stop the largely unregulated influx of abortion pills into Texas since the state banned abortion. But critics argue the bill’s shield from legal challenges is unconstitutional and warn it could establish a troubling precedent extending well beyond abortion rights.

“This is a flagrant, brazen transgression of the principles of the separation of powers on which this country and state were founded,” said state Sen. Nathan Johnson, D-Dallas.

Republicans see it differently. “No, sir. We make the rules, we set the jurisdiction,” said state Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola.

Abortion pills bill sparks debate on constitutionality

The debate over jurisdiction is precisely where the bill becomes more controversial.

Most notably, the bill says state judges would have no jurisdiction to rule on the constitutionality of the law. If a judge does attempt to weigh in, they could be personally sued for the same $100,000.

In essence, by ruling on the law, the judge would waive his or her governmental immunity.

Some attorneys find it baffling to pass legislation that could be unconstitutional and then make it difficult for the courts to declare it so.

“It’s shocking on all levels,” said legal analyst Mercedes Colwin. “There are three branches of government, and basically, what the legislators are saying is that the judicial branch of government is nonexistent, with respect to this law.”

Attorneys say such a move could set a dangerous precedent. It also raises questions about whether other states would recognize such a law.

Several Democratic states have shield laws in place to protect against such repercussions.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Sullivan County Child Advocacy Center Marks 35 Years of Dedication to Youth Support

In a significant milestone, the Child Advocacy Center of Sullivan County, the…

Breaking News: Travel Nurse Indictment Rocks Bristol Regional Medical Center

A travel nurse assigned to Bristol Regional Medical Center has found herself…

Orange County’s Future Animal Haven: Groundbreaking Ceremony Heralds 2027 Opening

In Orlando, Florida, construction has commenced on a state-of-the-art animal shelter, marking…

Trump’s NATO Clash: Transatlantic Tensions Escalate Over Controversial Middle East Conflict

LONDON – In a move that could significantly alter the landscape of…

Shocking Health Hazards: Central Florida Restaurants Plagued by Rodent Infestations

ORLANDO, Fla. – Recently, more than a dozen dining establishments in Central…

NFL Commits to Upholding Rooney Rule Amid Legal Challenge from Florida Attorney General

KISSIMMEE, Fla. – The National Football League is holding its ground regarding…

Revolutionizing Africa: How New Funding is Powering Lives and Expanding Electricity Access

In the early morning hours within the cramped lanes of Mathare, an…

Tragic Earthquake Strikes Indonesia: Fatality Confirmed as Tsunami Warning Issued

JAKARTA – In the early hours of Thursday, an earthquake struck Indonesian…