Texas bill targets abortion pills, $100K penalty for distributors
Share this @internewscast.com


DALLAS () Texas Republicans are pushing a new bill targeting abortion pills they say would be nearly impossible to overturn.

Senate Bill 2880, which passed in the Senate last week, allows individuals to sue anyone who manufactures, distributes, mails, prescribes or provides abortion-inducing drugs, with potential penalties of up to $100,000. It also expands the state’s wrongful death statute.

Supporters of the legislation say it’s intended to stop the largely unregulated influx of abortion pills into Texas since the state banned abortion. But critics argue the bill’s shield from legal challenges is unconstitutional and warn it could establish a troubling precedent extending well beyond abortion rights.

“This is a flagrant, brazen transgression of the principles of the separation of powers on which this country and state were founded,” said state Sen. Nathan Johnson, D-Dallas.

Republicans see it differently. “No, sir. We make the rules, we set the jurisdiction,” said state Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola.

Abortion pills bill sparks debate on constitutionality

The debate over jurisdiction is precisely where the bill becomes more controversial.

Most notably, the bill says state judges would have no jurisdiction to rule on the constitutionality of the law. If a judge does attempt to weigh in, they could be personally sued for the same $100,000.

In essence, by ruling on the law, the judge would waive his or her governmental immunity.

Some attorneys find it baffling to pass legislation that could be unconstitutional and then make it difficult for the courts to declare it so.

“It’s shocking on all levels,” said legal analyst Mercedes Colwin. “There are three branches of government, and basically, what the legislators are saying is that the judicial branch of government is nonexistent, with respect to this law.”

Attorneys say such a move could set a dangerous precedent. It also raises questions about whether other states would recognize such a law.

Several Democratic states have shield laws in place to protect against such repercussions.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

New Meat Processing Facility in Telford Offers Advantages for Farmers and Students Alike

TELFORD, Tenn. (WJHL) – The newly opened Appalachian Producers Cooperative in Telford…

Jury Starts Weighing Decisions in Harvey Weinstein’s Sex Crimes Retrial

NEW YORK – Jury deliberations commenced Thursday in the retrial of Harvey…

Trump and Germany’s New Leader to Discuss Aid for Ukraine and Trade

Not sure where to watch ? Download the free  Now app or…

Georgia Bureau of Investigation Probes Evans County School Board

EVANS COUNTY, Ga. () — The Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) confirmed…

Florida Man Arrested for Allegedly Abusing Child; Both Found to be HIV Positive

PINELLAS COUNTY, Fl. () – Detectives from the Crimes Against Children Unit…

Sacred Heart-Griffin Baseball Aims for State Title as Finals Weekend Approaches

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WCIA) – The Springfield Sacred Heart-Griffin baseball team is advancing…

Musk’s Battle Against Trump’s Massive Bill Might Disrupt Midterm Elections

Elon Musk’s crusade against President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” of tax…

Ana de Armas Reunites with Keanu Reeves in ‘Ballerina,’ a 10-Year Reunion

NEW YORK – Long before Ana de Armas wielded an ice skate…

Uber introduces a new tool to help seniors with transportation needs

COLUMBUS, Ga. (WRBL) — The ride-booking app, Uber, announced today their new…

Legislators Observe the Ongoing Drama Between Trump and Musk Unfold

Members of Congress are sitting back and watching the show. The bromance…

Michelle Obama Supports Malia’s Decision to Omit Her Surname from Film Credits

() Former first lady Michelle Obama reportedly said she and Barack Obama…

Mexico’s First Indigenous Supreme Court Justice in 170 Years Sparks Hope and Skepticism

MEXICO CITY – During his bid for a position on Mexico’s Supreme…