Texas bill targets abortion pills, $100K penalty for distributors
Share this @internewscast.com


DALLAS () Texas Republicans are pushing a new bill targeting abortion pills they say would be nearly impossible to overturn.

Senate Bill 2880, which passed in the Senate last week, allows individuals to sue anyone who manufactures, distributes, mails, prescribes or provides abortion-inducing drugs, with potential penalties of up to $100,000. It also expands the state’s wrongful death statute.

Supporters of the legislation say it’s intended to stop the largely unregulated influx of abortion pills into Texas since the state banned abortion. But critics argue the bill’s shield from legal challenges is unconstitutional and warn it could establish a troubling precedent extending well beyond abortion rights.

“This is a flagrant, brazen transgression of the principles of the separation of powers on which this country and state were founded,” said state Sen. Nathan Johnson, D-Dallas.

Republicans see it differently. “No, sir. We make the rules, we set the jurisdiction,” said state Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola.

Abortion pills bill sparks debate on constitutionality

The debate over jurisdiction is precisely where the bill becomes more controversial.

Most notably, the bill says state judges would have no jurisdiction to rule on the constitutionality of the law. If a judge does attempt to weigh in, they could be personally sued for the same $100,000.

In essence, by ruling on the law, the judge would waive his or her governmental immunity.

Some attorneys find it baffling to pass legislation that could be unconstitutional and then make it difficult for the courts to declare it so.

“It’s shocking on all levels,” said legal analyst Mercedes Colwin. “There are three branches of government, and basically, what the legislators are saying is that the judicial branch of government is nonexistent, with respect to this law.”

Attorneys say such a move could set a dangerous precedent. It also raises questions about whether other states would recognize such a law.

Several Democratic states have shield laws in place to protect against such repercussions.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Asian Markets Rise Following Wall Street Surge, Though Trade War Doubts Linger

Asian shares advanced Tuesday after China and the United States announced a…

Bernie Sanders Supports Initiative to Reduce Medication Prices, Advocates for More Aggressive Measures

() Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has endorsed President Donald Trump’s executive order…

White House Reporters Object to Absence of Wire Journalists on Air Force One

The association representing journalists assigned to the White House expressed concern on…

US Reduces ‘De Minimis’ Tariff on Small Value Shipments from China

() The Trump administration will cut the “de minimis” tariff on low-value…

Global Aviation Council Concludes Russia’s Role in MH17 Crash Over Ukraine in 2014

MELBOURNE – On Tuesday, the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization…

Deputies Report: Parents Arrested After Rat Bites Baby in Anderson County

ANDERSON COUNTY, S.C. (WSPA) — A six-month old girl remains in the…

Trump Speaks in Saudi Arabia: Key Highlights

IE 11 is no longer supported. To ensure the best experience, please…

Fresh Information Surfaces in Largo Hit-and-Run Incident Injuring Mother and Daughter

LARGO, Fla. (WFLA) — New details highlight how a trip to Walmart…

Denver Pet Walker Cautions App Users After Falling Victim to a Scam by Another User

DENVER (KDVR) A Denver woman is warning people of a scam that…

International Aviation Authority Concludes Russia’s Role in 2014 MH17 Crash Over Ukraine

The Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in Melbourne, Australia,…

Michael Jordan to Join NBC as Special Contributor for NBA Coverage

Michael Jordan is joining NBC Sports as a special contributor to its…

Beaufort County’s New Budget Keeps Residents’ Taxes Unchanged

BEAUFORT COUNTY, S.C. () — Beaufort County presented their new estimated budget…