Texas bill targets abortion pills, $100K penalty for distributors
Share this @internewscast.com


DALLAS () Texas Republicans are pushing a new bill targeting abortion pills they say would be nearly impossible to overturn.

Senate Bill 2880, which passed in the Senate last week, allows individuals to sue anyone who manufactures, distributes, mails, prescribes or provides abortion-inducing drugs, with potential penalties of up to $100,000. It also expands the state’s wrongful death statute.

Supporters of the legislation say it’s intended to stop the largely unregulated influx of abortion pills into Texas since the state banned abortion. But critics argue the bill’s shield from legal challenges is unconstitutional and warn it could establish a troubling precedent extending well beyond abortion rights.

“This is a flagrant, brazen transgression of the principles of the separation of powers on which this country and state were founded,” said state Sen. Nathan Johnson, D-Dallas.

Republicans see it differently. “No, sir. We make the rules, we set the jurisdiction,” said state Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola.

Abortion pills bill sparks debate on constitutionality

The debate over jurisdiction is precisely where the bill becomes more controversial.

Most notably, the bill says state judges would have no jurisdiction to rule on the constitutionality of the law. If a judge does attempt to weigh in, they could be personally sued for the same $100,000.

In essence, by ruling on the law, the judge would waive his or her governmental immunity.

Some attorneys find it baffling to pass legislation that could be unconstitutional and then make it difficult for the courts to declare it so.

“It’s shocking on all levels,” said legal analyst Mercedes Colwin. “There are three branches of government, and basically, what the legislators are saying is that the judicial branch of government is nonexistent, with respect to this law.”

Attorneys say such a move could set a dangerous precedent. It also raises questions about whether other states would recognize such a law.

Several Democratic states have shield laws in place to protect against such repercussions.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

DC Attorney Jeanine Pirro Attributes Rise in Youth Deaths to Illegal Firearms

() U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro blamed illegal…

Simple Bedroom Enhancements for Improved Sleep in Florida

TAMPA, Fla. (BLOOM) – Getting a good night’s sleep is paramount to…

Defense Sets the Tone for Illini’s Jasmine Brown-Hagger

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. (WCIA) – Jasmine Brown-Hagger didn’t mince words when asked about…

Michigan Jury Grants Almost $60M to Man Claiming Rights Violation by Prosecutor

A jury in Detroit granted almost $60 million to a man who…

ICE Detains Teen with Disabilities Outside of L.A. School

Los Angeles Unified School District leaders are calling for limits on immigration…

Iowa Veteran Close to Completing Appalachian Trail Journey

WHO 13 NEWS – Iowa veteran Joedy VanVelzen will summit Mount Katahdin…

VIDEO: Powerball Jackpot Winner Tackled and Tased Following Incident with Pinellas Deputy

ST. PETE BEACH, Fla. (WFLA) — Recently released footage revealed the events…

South Carolina Attorney General Counters Murdaugh’s Appeal Allegations

The South Carolina Attorney General’s office has issued a comprehensive 184-page document…

Spirit Airlines Raises Concerns About Its Long-Term Viability

NEW YORK – Just months after emerging from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, Spirit…

Taylor Swift Reveals Upcoming Album: ‘The Showgirl’s Journey’

Taylor Swift’s new era is on the horizon. Are you ready for…

Beaufort Parents’ Information Request Unveils Thousands of Unredacted Private Records

In BEAUFORT, S.C., a 12-year-old girl disappeared in February, and from the…

Former President Trump Backs Burt Jones for Georgia’s 2026 Gubernatorial Race

ATLANTA () — President Donald Trump announced that he is endorsing Georgia’s…