5.9k Share this

Two conservative justices on the Supreme Court this week voiced their support for the hiring rights of religious organizations, arguing that such organizations should not be compelled to employ individuals who do not share their religious views.

“To force religious organizations to hire messengers and other personnel who do not share their religious views would undermine not only the autonomy of many religious organizations but also their continued viability,” Justice Sam Alito argued in a statement he and Justice Clarence Thomas issued Monday.

The comments from Alito and Thomas came as the court declined to take up a dispute involving the Seattle Union Gospel Mission, a Christian nonprofit that was sued after refusing to hire an LGBT applicant to serve in its legal aid clinic.

In an original ruling on the matter, King County Superior Court Judge Karen Donohue dismissed the suit filed against the mission by bisexual attorney Matt Woods, claiming the nonprofit was within its rights to refuse to hire Woods since, as a religious group, it was exempt from the state’s anti-discrimination law regarding sexual orientation.

But last year, the Washington Supreme Court reversed the ruling and sent the case back down to the lower court, specifically to review whether the nonprofit’s religious exemption applies to all positions of employment.

TheBlaze reported at the time that the ruling could open the door to forcing religious organizations to hire LGBT individuals and other employees who do not share their beliefs. In their Monday statement, Alito and Thomas seemed to agree that such a ruling would not only “undermine” the autonomy of religious organizations but could also lead to their extinction.

“If states could compel religious organizations to hire employees who fundamentally disagree with them, many religious non-profits would be extinguished from participation in public life — perhaps by those who disagree with their theological views most vigorously,” the justices warned.

That, they said, would not only infringe on the groups’ rights to freely exercise religion but would “greatly impoverish our nation’s civic and religious life.”

Though the justices agreed that the case had not yet reached a ripe enough stage for the high court to grant a review, they foreshadowed a future ruling in the dispute.

“Because of the interlocutory posture of this case, [we] concur in the denial of certiorari at this time,” Alito wrote. “But the day may soon come when we must decide whether the autonomy guaranteed by the First Amendment protects religious organizations’ freedom to hire co-religionists without state or judicial interference.”

Source: TheBlaze

5.9k Share this
You May Also Like

CHELSEA 3-2 MANCHESTER CITY: Emma Hayes’ team complete the double thanks to Sam Kerr’s winner

Chelsea Women 3-2 Manchester City Women (AET): Emma Hayes’ team complete the…

Andrew Symonds had no pulse and his dogs refused to leave him when couple tried to save his life

A couple who were the first to find Andrew Symonds’ wrecked car…

Ukrainian Band ‘Kalush Orchestra’ Wins Eurovision Thanks to Audience Vote

TURIN, Italy (AP) — Ukrainian band Kalush Orchestra won the Eurovision Song…

Biden Purposefully Spiking Illegal Immigration for ‘Cynical Political Policy … to Buy Votes’

Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) says President Joe Biden is “purposefully” increasing illegal…

Detention of WNBA’s Griner in Moscow Extended for 1 Month

MOSCOW (AP) — The lawyer for WNBA star Brittney Griner said Friday…

Expert speculates Elon Musk’s $44B Twitter takeover is all a ploy to liquidate Tesla shares

Some analysts are speculating that Elon Musk’s $44 billion bid to buy…

Chinese CCTV Cameras Contain Hidden Microphones, Gov Advisor Warns

Chinese-made surveillance cameras in Britain are made by companies linked to human…

You Could Apply DHS’ Definition of Disinformation to Obama

On Friday’s broadcast of HBO’s “Real Time,” host Bill Maher criticized the…