Share this @internewscast.com
“The reality is that if you give them an inch, they’ll take a mile. Does anyone really believe that after dabbling in racism in Sydney, they’ll just stop there?” This sentiment highlights the growing concern surrounding recent events in the city.
In a recent development, police were caught off guard as a protest took place in Sydney, organized by a group clad in black outside the New South Wales Parliament. Deputy Commissioner Lanyon clarified, “It was assessed by the police’s local command area at the time based on the available information,” emphasizing that neither law enforcement nor government officials had prior knowledge of the protest.

Speeches from the protest, which were shared widely on social media, revealed members of the NSN attributing their grievances to what they termed as ‘the Jewish lobby,’ whom they accused of undermining political freedoms. This rhetoric has sparked further debate about the boundaries of free speech and the influence of hate speech in public discourse.
Lanyon further explained that the command-level authorization for the protest was granted based on an assessment that anticipated no illegal or violent activities would occur. However, this incident has brought to light the challenges faced by authorities in balancing public safety with civil liberties.
In response to rising concerns, New South Wales has enacted new laws as of August, criminalizing the incitement of racial hatred in public spaces. Those found guilty could face severe consequences, including up to two years in prison or a fine of $11,000. These measures underscore the government’s commitment to curbing hate speech and protecting community harmony.
Lanyon said police would seek to “ensure the legislation currently permits us to do what is being requested, and certainly what the government quite rightly and the community expect, which is this type of division does not occur”.
“Minns’ use of today’s rally as a justification for giving the police more powers to shut down demonstrations appears disingenuous given that the police already had the power to apply to the Supreme Court for an order prohibiting the rally but chose not to use it,” he said.