A farmhand accused of bludgeoning a neighbouring farmer to death allegedly confessed three times after the incident.

But Clinton Beau Wrigley attacked the confession witnesses as unreliable during closing arguments in his NSW Supreme Court trial today.

The 40-year-old plead not guilty to murdering 58-year-old Joel Carter at a rural property in January 2023.

The farmer succumbed to blunt-force trauma after being repeatedly struck on the head during the night of January 22nd or the early hours of the next day, as the jury has been informed.

Wrigley made three confessions to three witnesses after the alleged murder took place, crown prosecutor Michelle Swift said today.

One witness said Wrigley told him that he had bludgeoned the farmer to death with a rubber mallet and hidden the weapon inside his burning ute.

But Wrigley’s barrister Nicholas Broadbent SC called the witnesses unreliable and labelled one as “most unimpressive”.

“You might say something shocking but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s true,” he said.

Yesterday, Wrigley attempted to shift the blame onto his boss while giving evidence.

He also told the jury that all three witnesses and crown prosecutor were lying.

While his client’s evidence was unsophisticated, Broadbent told the jury that Wrigley’s boss had numerous reasons to be frustrated with Carter.

Broadbent mentioned that the boss had entered into a share-farming agreement with Carter, but a family member testified that Carter had not yet received any payment from this deal.

One witness said Wrigley’s boss told her he never wanted to do business with Carter again, Broadbent told the jury.

The jury previously heard Wrigley’s boss had numerous disagreements with Carter, including one physical altercation.

Swift accepted there was evidence that Carter was a difficult person to work with and became angry or got abusive when drinking.

“But this does not mean he (Wrigley’s boss) has responded in any manner that would make you question the crown case,” she said.

Swift told the jury that Wrigley’s references to his boss in his testimony were relatively ordinary, casual, and taken out of context following Joel Carter’s death.

His body was found lying on a metal-framed bed in his lounge room in an advanced state of decomposition two days after he was killed.

Swift addressed the defence’s concerns that Wrigley’s boss’s DNA was found on the curtains in Carter’s room after his death.

But his boss had lived in Carter’s house for many years and had recently moved out before the incident occurred, she said.

It was therefore likely that his DNA would be present throughout the house, Swift told the jury.

There was no DNA evidence from Wrigley present at the scene, but Swift highlighted a conversation captured by police through a wire worn by his boss after the incident.

“You can search everything I’ve got … I burnt it all,” Wrigley told his boss in the taped conversation.

Prosecutors claim he revealed a motive for the alleged murder during the covertly recorded call, in which he said “the main thing that done” Carter was his poor treatment of his sister-in-law.

But Broadbent questioned the connection between Wrigley and Carter’s sister-in-law.

“You can apply your common sense when it comes to assessing a motive,” he said.

The trial will continue tomorrow at Dubbo’s Supreme Court.