Greens Leader Larissa Waters Asserts Party's Commitment to Address Gaza Issues

Share this @internewscast.com

Expressing strong opposition to certain issues has often been cited as a reason for the Greens’ lackluster lower-house election outcomes, but experts believe it may have actually helped the party attract new supporters.

This stance is one that the newly appointed party leader, Larissa Waters, stands firmly by, despite criticisms that the party may have drifted away from its original environmental foundations.

Waters insists that social issues are vital to the Greens’ agenda and can seamlessly integrate with their commitments to tackling climate change, promoting free education, and ensuring adequate healthcare funding.

Following her win — in the wake of Adam Bandt’s surprising loss of the Melbourne seat — Waters emphasized the Greens’ ability to address multiple issues effectively simultaneously.

“We certainly don’t retreat from our firm position on social justice issues,” the Queensland senator told the ABC’s RN on Friday morning.

“We will always call out atrocities, and we will always work to make sure that people’s daily needs are met and that we’re looking after the planet.”

Senator Waters said wanting peace in the Middle East didn’t make the party antisemitic and condemned both antisemitism and Islamophobia as unacceptable.

On Friday afternoon, deputy leader Mehreen Faruqi echoed Waters’ comments, and said the party had taken a “strong moral position and a position of justice”.

When asked whether the Green would focus more on the environment in the Parliament, she said the two issues were connected.

Five people smiling as they pose for a photo while standing outside with arms around each others' shoulders.

(Left to right) Greens senators Penny Allman-Payne, Mehreen Faruqi, Larissa Waters, Sarah Hanson-Young and Nick McKim. Source: AAP / Joel Carrett

“Social justice issues and environmental justice issues, are completely interlinked,” she said.

“There can be no climate justice without social justice, without economic justice or racial justice. We’ll continue on with that.”

As the Greens encounter calls to refocus on environmental matters, this is how their stance on Gaza might have influenced their vote and why championing social justice is not a novel strategy for the party.

Did the Greens’ stance on Gaza lose them votes?

Despite losing three out of their four lower house seats, the Greens’ primary national vote remains at roughly 12 per cent in the lower house — similar to their 2022 result.

Election analyst Ben Raue said the Greens lost support in their traditional inner-city heartlands but picked up extra votes further into suburbs where they had no chance of winning a seat.

He indicated that although Gaza wasn’t a primary element of the Greens’ election campaign, it played a role in engaging conversations with voters who might not have previously connected with the party’s platform.

“I think it has helped them crack a new voter base that they didn’t previously have access to,” Raue told SBS News.

“I don’t think it’s the primary reason why they’ve lost votes elsewhere, but there could be questions there about how much they prioritise that work versus other things that are closer to home.”

Redbridge Group director Simon Welsh cautioned against making conclusions about diverse communities until more analysis had been done.

While he agreed the Greens’ stance on Gaza swayed some voters — particularly in Muslim communities in the north of Melbourne and west of Sydney — he said the party’s vote in outer suburban areas had been growing for some time.

“So the question we’ve got to disentangle is: was Gaza additive to that, or are we just seeing a continuation of a trend that was there before?” he told SBS news, adding that this pre-existing trend was “born more of dissatisfaction with the two major parties than it is around any sort of given issue.”

Welsh said this serves as an important warning to Labor to , with the ALP on track for a historic 93 seats.

Why foreign policy isn’t new territory for the Greens

The Greens have a history of campaigning on both environmental and social justice issues, Raue said.

“Campaigning against armed conflict in other parts of the world is pretty typical for the Greens, and that’s been around as part of their base since the beginning,” he said.

“The Greens got a big boost in the membership and a big boost in the vote around the time of the Iraq War and the Tampa crisis in the early 2000s.”

Former party leader Bob Brown and then-Greens senator Kerry Nettle famously heckled George W Bush in 2003, a gesture of opposition to Australia sending 2,000 troops to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Two men shake hands surrounded by a group of men in suits inside the House of Representatives.

Former United States president George W Bush said he “loved free speech” in response to a heckle from Greens parliamentarians, shaking hands with senator Bob Brown before exiting the chamber. Source: AAP / Andrew Taylor

Meanwhile in 2001, Brown led criticism of then-prime minister John Howard’s refusal to allow asylum seekers rescued by the MV Tampa to land on Christmas Island.

Brown joined Labor and independents to vote down emergency legislation that would force the ship, which had 400 asylum seekers on board, to be removed from Australian waters.

Raue argued that under Bandt’s leadership there has been an emphasis on “inequality issues closer to home”, with less focus on foreign policy, human rights or refugee activism.

Pressure for Greens to use Senate power to refocus

Senator Waters, a former environmental lawyer, said she wanted the Greens to have a role in rewriting , which the government has promised to pass this term.

The pledge has buoyed some environmental groups, who think the party has become overly distracted by other progressive causes.

“We think this is a welcome sign that the Greens are getting back to core business, which is protection of climate and the environment,” Australian Conservation Foundation climate and energy program manager Gavan McFadzean told AAP.

“In terms of their campaigns and their public work … it would be good for them to have a stronger focus on climate and environment this term.”

The Greens have retained 11 seats in the upper house, giving them the balance of power — meaning Labor can work exclusively with the party to pass legislation.

Labor went to the 2022 election promising to fix its nature positive laws, which among other things would establish a national compliance and enforcement body to be called Environment Protection Australia.

However, the changes were shelved as it failed to reach a vote in the Senate.

“We are very keen to be able to rewrite those laws and actually protect nature and take action on the climate crisis that’s wreaking so much havoc on this beautiful planet and on our lives,” Waters said on Friday.

Labor could also opt to negotiate with the Coalition, which has won 26 seats, bypassing the Greens and other crossbench senators entirely.

— With additional reporting by the Australian Associated Press

For the latest from SBS News, and