The submission advised against assigning the special forces to a dedicated combat role in Afghanistan.

It was argued that engaging Australia’s elite soldiers in such a role would neither fulfill security goals nor aid reconstruction efforts.

At the time, one Australian soldier had been killed in the line of duty. Australia would ultimately lose 41 soldiers to the war in Afghanistan — the nation’s longest ever.

Warnings around prisoners of war

The SAS would stay for years in what became 20 rotations, involving 3,000 personnel, while Australia’s mission also grew with a ‘Reconstruction Task Force’ deployed in 2006 to Uruzgan province.

Then-prime minister John Howard announced a 150-strong special forces deployment to Afghanistan in 2005. Credit: AAP

However, the submission about the reconstruction team and the information about the decision to deploy them are among eight files that are fully closed from this year’s release.

The National Archives of Australia exempted its disclosure as the item relates to defence strategy and could potentially affect relations with a foreign government.

Defending Australia’s role in Afghanistan

It also found credible information that junior soldiers were ordered by seniors to shoot a prisoner, as part of their first kills, in a practice described as “blooding”.

It also detailed a practice known as “throwdowns” where weapons and radios would be placed next to bodies as a cover.

‘Widest possible context’

“I think it’s important that we’re seen to be responsibly playing our part, and you do so with allies,” he told SBS News in December.

Former attorney-general Philip Ruddock says deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan need to be viewed in context. Source: AAP

Pressed on whether it was the wrong call, he defended Australia’s role in Afghanistan.

“I have seen what the Taliban have done, and there is no way that I think we should be turning a blind eye to some of the very significant human rights abuses that occur in a situation like that.”