Share this @internewscast.com
The Federal Court has determined that speeches given by an Islamic preacher in Sydney violated the Racial Discrimination Act, concluding that his portrayals of Jewish individuals relied on “ancient stereotypes” that were “inherently racist and antisemitic”.
Announcing his decision after a five-day trial, Justice Angus Stewart dismissed Wissam (William) Haddad’s argument that his statements were fair and made with honest intent.
“I have concluded that the series of talks titled ‘The Jews of Al-Madina’ included derogatory comments about Jewish people and were likely to offend, insult, humiliate, and intimidate Jewish individuals in Australia,” Justice Stewart stated.
“These comments were made because of the race or ethnic background of that group.”

Haddad serves as a preacher and educator at the Al Madina Dawah Centre in Bankstown located in Sydney’s south-west, which he co-established and manages.

A man wearing a black suit and a pink tie is speaking into a microphone.

Justice Angus Stewart announced his ruling in the Federal Court in Sydney, determining that Wissam Haddad violated the Racial Discrimination Act. Source: Supplied

Peter Wertheim and Robert Goot, representing the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ), brought the case against Haddad over a series of lectures and sermons he gave at the centre in November 2023, which were subsequently posted online.

Justice Stewart said it was “a time of heightened vulnerability and fragility experienced by Jews in Australia following the attack by Hamas on 7 October 2023”, and that the community “would experience [the comments] to be harassing … because of their profound offensiveness and the long history of persecution of Jews associated with the use of such rhetoric”.
During the trial, the court heard numerous excerpts of Haddad’s speeches, which included references to Jewish people as “vile”, treacherous”, “mischievous”, “descended from apes and pigs”, and “hiding like the rats that they are”, as well as other “tropes”, including Jewish people controlling banks and the media.
On the stand, Haddad defended the comments, saying he was referring to “Jews of faith, not ethnicity”, “the Jewish people that are in power in Israel”, and quoting religious scriptures.

Justice Stewart rejected Haddad’s defence and said his comments “made perverse generalisations against Jewish people as a group”.

“Haddad sought to justify the imputations on the basis that he was teaching tafsir [commentary on or teachings of the Quran],” Justice Stewart said.
“But the expert witnesses on Islamic theology from both sides agree that neither the Quran nor the Hadith teach that Jews have an inherent negative quality as a people.
“The respondent’s expert [witness], said that Islam does not encourage hatred towards Jews.”
Justice Stewart also acknowledged Haddad had made critical comments about the actions of Israel Defense Forces in Gaza and about Zionists.
“Disparagement of Zionism constitutes disparagement of a philosophy or ideology and not a race or ethnic group,” Justice Stewart said.
“Political criticism of Israel, however inflammatory or adversarial, is not by its nature criticism of Jews in general or based on Jewish racial or ethnic identity.”

Haddad has been ordered to pay the applicant’s costs, remove the offending material, and refrain from similar activity.

‘Vindicated’ by the judgment

Speaking outside court, ECAJ co-chief executive Peter Wertheim said he felt “vindicated” by the judgment.
“This case was not about freedom of expression, or freedom of religion, it was about antisemitism and the abuse of those freedoms to promote antisemitism,” he said.
“People are free to engage in robust debate about international conflicts, whether their beliefs are true or false … but that does not include the freedom to mobilise racism … to promote one’s views.”

Wertheim emphasized that the issue was not a discussion about the political critique of the Israeli government or Zionism, but noted that such discussions are “completely within the realm of regular conversation”.

Two men in suits are speaking to the media.

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) took Wissam Haddad to the Federal Court over a series of lectures delivered at the Al Madina Dawah Centre in Sydney in November 2023. Source: AAP / Dan Himbrechts

“The court has ordered that Mr Haddad and the centre … be restrained from republishing comments that contain a whole series of imputations about Jews, including the infamous one about Jews being descended from apes and pigs,” Wertheim said.

ECAJ deputy president Robert Goot said: “We brought this action to protect the safety of the Jewish community and to uphold its honour and integrity.”
Both Wertheim and Goot expressed disappointment at having to bring the case to civil court after efforts to pursue state-based criminal charges in NSW failed.
Haddad did not speak outside court, but his lawyer Elias Tabchouri said his client “maintains that his sermons delivered in the context of religious instruction and based on scriptural references, were never intended to insult any group in Australia on the basis of their ethnic identity”.
“The words he spoke were those from the scripture, and he maintains he has the right to quote religious scripture, and the court has found he has that right.
“The court has found that simply criticising what the Israeli nation has done in Gaza is not antisemitic, and that position has been affirmed by the court.
“We will be complying with court orders.”

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like
SA Police Commissioner Grant Stevens foreshadowed South Australia's major emergency declaration could soon end, bringing a change to vaccine mandates.

Police Chief Probed for Mistakenly Discharging Weapon Three Decades Ago

Grant Stevens, the South Australian Police Commissioner, has revealed that he is…

Victoria’s Pioneering Indigenous Truth-Telling Commission Concludes, Revealing Hidden Histories

The nation’s inaugural truth telling inquiry has released its final report, which…
Kanye West's website has been pulled from the internet.

Kanye West Denied Entry to Australia Due to Latest Song Release

The federal government has stripped controversial rapper Kanye West of his Australian…

Iran Severs Relations with UN Nuclear Agency Following US and Israeli Attacks

Key Points Iran has suspended inspections by the UN nuclear watchdog. New…
Homes under threat from seven-metre surf

Seven-Metre Waves Endanger Coastal Homes

Multiple evacuation warnings remain in place and strong winds and dangerous surf…

Tony Burke Announces Cancellation of Kanye West’s Australian Visa Due to Controversial Hitler Song

US rapper Kanye West has had his Australian visa cancelled over a…
Dalai Lama ends years of speculation with move set to annoy China

Dalai Lama’s Decision Likely to Frustrate China After Years of Speculation Ends

The Dalai Lama has announced that he will have a successor after…
The savage dig was reminiscent of yet another amorous 'rivalry' between the Kiwi artist, industry mogul Jack Antonoff, 41, and his former girlfriend Lena Dunham , 39. Jack and Lena in 2017

Lorde’s New Romance Sparks Buzz: Singer’s Fresh Relationship Stirs Up Past Rumors with Jack Antonoff and Lena Dunham as Her Partner Splits from Six-Year Girlfriend

From Fleetwood Mac to Eric Clapton, some of the finest art has…
Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong —  who is in Washington this week for Quad talks between Australia, the United States, Japan and India

Trump Administration ‘Apologized’ for Delaying Meeting with Prime Minister

The Trump administration expressed regret over postponing a meeting with Prime Minister…
Wild weather smashes Queensland's south-east

Queensland Prepares for Severe Weather as ‘Bomb Cyclone’ Crosses the Border

Residents in south-east Queensland are preparing for a fresh round of wild…
Fatigue is a factor in one in five crashes on Australian roads, the NRMA says.

One in four drivers confess to dozing off briefly while driving

Almost one in four Australians have succumbed to a microsleep while driving,…

How a Financial Choice Became My Lifeline After a Parkinson’s Diagnosis

Is super fairly providing for all Australians in retirement? With legislative changes…