Share this @internewscast.com

This week, in one of the most shocking business moves in recent memory, Twitter reversed itself and decided to sell itself after all to Elon Musk, who paid some $44 billion for the privilege. The move was made, at least in part, for ideological reasons; Musk has been vocally critical of Twitter’s management of information flow. Immediately upon the news of the buyout breaking, Musk tweeted, “Free speech is the bedrock of a functional democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated. I also want to make Twitter better than ever by enhancing the product with new features, making the algorithms open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots, and authenticating all humans.”

All of these seem like worthwhile and anodyne goals. More speech, not less. More transparency, not less.

And yet the political Left went utterly insane. Charles Blow of The New York Times vowed to leave the service; in fact, #LeavingTwitter trended on the service. The American Civil Liberties Union, while noting that Musk is a card-carrying member, fretted, “there’s a lot of danger having so much power in the hands of any one individual.” Meanwhile, powerful individual with consolidated power Jeff Bezos worried over the possibility of Chinese influence on Twitter: “Interesting question. Did the Chinese government just gain a bit of leverage over the town square?” Sen. Elizabeth Warren called the deal “dangerous for our democracy.” MSNBC’s Ari Melber hilariously agonized, “You could secretly ban one party’s candidate, or all of its candidates, all of its nominees, or you could just secretly turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else and the rest of us might not even find out about it until after the elections.”

Yes, Ari, we know. That was the concern for tens of millions of us when social media decided to silence the Hunter Biden story, lock accounts of prominent Trump-associated officials who shared the story, and then finally to throw former President Donald Trump off of all services simultaneously following Jan. 6. That was one of Musk’s concerns, presumably, in purchasing the service.

Related: Leaked Audio Shows Twitter Execs Trying to Comfort Staff in All-Hands Meeting

The Left’s outsized panic over Musk’s takeover is revealing for two reasons. First, it shows that the Left always understood Twitter to be a key part of its ecosystem, a Left-biased platform designed to obscure its own leanings while propagandistically pushing a particular political agenda. For years, the Left claimed that conservative concerns about Twitter bias were simple paranoia. Now, upon Musk’s takeover, the Left has broken into spasms of apoplexy. That wouldn’t happen if they thought Twitter wasn’t their sole property.

Then there’s the bigger problem: the Left despises both transparency and free speech in the political realm. The Left would prefer secret algorithms that conceal “shadow-banning” and bottlenecking; the Left prefers “equity” in speech to freedom of speech. To the Left, the potential “harm” of allowing free speech outweighs the value in open debate. Better to ban The Babylon Bee for stating that Lia Thomas is a man than to allow such content to be passed around Twitter — and better never to let anyone know the algorithms behind such bans. After all, with transparency comes accountability. And the power is the point.

This is why Musk’s first moves at Twitter must be to release information about the prior practices of Twitter — a sort of truth and reconciliation commission; to make any new algorithms far more transparent; and to fire employees who object to such practices, of whom there are many. Musk may be just the man to help restore institutional trust to social media. But that will require him to bulldoze those who helped undermine that trust in the first place.

Source: This post first appeared on PJ Media

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Emotional plea for mercy in death case of Eric Jackson

Jury deliberations begin for man who murdered the daughter of a JSO…

Sheffield United Q&A: Ndiaye future, next season's kit deal, ticket prices, takeover and hotel

Welcome to Yorkshire Live’s weekly Sheffield United Q&A, talking all things Blades

DPD says officers ‘missed’ gun in searches before handcuffed man fired shots

DENVER — Denver’s police chief and a department spokesperson said Thursday they…

Target toy plush vehicle set recall

by: Jacob Burbrink – Digital Investigative Reporter and Producer, Nexstar Media Wire…

Tell Your Senators ‘Do Not Vote for This’

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry issued a call to arms in an…

Bentex children’s clothing sets recalled for lead paint

The clothing sets were sold at TJ Maxx, Ross, Burlington, Amazon and…

Democrats to discuss changing presidential primary calendar

Democrats to discuss changing presidential primary calendar – CBS News Watch CBS…

Rail strike update: Biden signing bill Friday averting strike

The Biden administration helped broker deals between the railroads and union leaders…

The Point, Dec. 2, 2022: Gators quarterback released on $80,000 bond

Subscribe to The Point, arriving in your inbox Monday through Friday at 8…

Boy, 10, Charged As Adult After Fatal Shooting Of Mom Who Refused To Buy Him A Headset

A 10-year-old Wisconsin boy has been charged as an adult after he…

Evil wife killer Chris Dawson gets 24 YEAR prison sentence for Teacher’s Pet murder

Teacher’s Pet wife killer Chris Dawson showed no emotion as he was…

China security apparatus well honed to deal with protests

BEIJING – When it comes to ensuring the security of their regime,…