Share this @internewscast.com

WASHINGTON — In ruling that states cannot kick Donald Trump off the ballot, the Supreme Court placed significant limits on any effort — including by Congress — to prevent the former president from returning to office.

Should Trump win the presidential election and lawmakers then seek to not certify the results and prevent him from taking office because he “engaged in insurrection” under Section 3 of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, the decision could foreclose that action.

It is on that point that the court — notionally unanimous in ruling for Trump despite its 6-3 conservative majority — appeared to be divided, with the three liberal justices vehemently objecting to the apparent straitjacket the decision enforced on Congress.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a conservative, wrote her own opinion saying she also believed the court had decided issues it did not need to resolve but she did not join the liberal justices’ separate opinion.

Apparently, without the support of the four women justices, a five-justice majority said that Congress had to act in specific ways to enforce section 3.

“This gives the Supreme Court major power to second guess any congressional decision over enforcement of Section 3,” Rick Hasen, an election law expert at UCLA School of Law, wrote immediately after the ruling.

The Colorado Supreme Court had found Trump had violated the provision in contesting the 2020 presidential election results in actions that ended with the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

In ruling for Trump, the U.S. Supreme Court specified that anything Congress does must be specifically tailored to addressing section 3, an implicit warning that broad legislation could be struck down.

“Today, the majority goes beyond the necessities of this case to limit how Section 3 can bar an oathbreaking insurrectionist from becoming president,” the liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote on their separate opinion.

By weighing in on the role of Congress, “the majority attempts to insulate all alleged insurrectionists from future challenges to their holding federal office,” they added.

One sentence in particular attracted the attention of legal experts, with the liberal justices writing that the majority was seemingly “ruling out enforcement under general federal statutes requiring the government comply with the law.”

Several observers said this may be a reference to Congress’ role in certifying the presidential election results should Trump win in November, which is now governed by the Electoral Count Reform Act enacted in 2022 with the aim of preventing another Jan. 6.

The law includes language saying that Congress can refuse to count electoral votes that are not “regularly given.” That could be interpreted to apply to a winning candidate who members of Congress believe is not eligible to serve under section 3.

Derek Muller, an election law expert at Notre Dame Law School, said it seemed the majority wanted to “close that door.”

But, he added, “the court is speaking somewhat opaquely here, as if it does not want to reveal the true substance of the disagreement.”

Jason Murray, who argued the Colorado case at the Supreme Court on behalf of the voters who wanted Trump kicked off the ballot, said he also thought the court may be referring to the Electoral Count Reform Act.

“It seems to me that one thing that the liberals might be referring to is the possibility that Congress might on January 6, 2025 refuse to count votes that were cast for former President Trump,” he added.

Not everyone agreed with that interpretation, with Richard Pildes, a professor at New York University School of Law, saying the liberal justices may have been referring to the potential for legal challenges about Trump’s authority as president if he were in office again.

If the court was addressing the counting of electoral college votes “they could easily have mentioned that if that’s what they meant,” he added.

Hasen wrote that the ruling means that if Trump wins the election and Congress tries to disqualify him, the Supreme Court “will have the last word.” In the meantime, “we may well have a nasty, nasty post-election period,” he added.


Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like
Impostor uses AI to impersonate Rubio and contact foreign and US officials

AI-Driven Impostor Masquerades as Rubio to Reach Out to Officials

The State Department is alerting U.S. diplomats about attempts to impersonate Secretary…
Belgium's King Albert, 91, undergoes cancer treatment for sixth time

King Albert of Belgium, 91, Receives Cancer Treatment for the Sixth Time

King Albert II of Belgium has kickstarted cancer treatment for the sixth…
Texas RV park owner banged on doors as water rose, family was swept away

Texas RV Park Owner Warned Residents as Rising Waters Swept Away a Family

The owner of a Texas Hill Country RV park and restaurant is…
Dashcam footage of a bicycle collision.

Dashcam Video Captures Terrifying Moment as Boy on Bicycle is Trapped Between Two Cars in Unusual Accident

HORROR dashcam video shows a boy riding a bicycle being crushed between…
PETA sues AKC over breed standards for Frenchies, pugs and more

PETA Files Lawsuit Against AKC Over Breeding Rules for French Bulldogs, Pugs, and Other Breeds

PETA argues that the influential club is promoting unhealthy physical features. NEW…
Massachusetts great white shark encounter with paddleboarders Margaret Bowles and Maddie Cronin in Cape Cod

Great White Shark Sighting in Cape Cod Involving Paddleboarders Margaret Bowles and Maddie Cronin

A Jaws-some experience. A great white shark startled two Massachusetts paddleboarders as…
UK court convicts 3 men over arson attack authorities say was organized by Russian intelligence

UK Court Finds 3 Men Guilty of Arson Attack Allegedly Coordinated by Russian Intelligence

A British jury on Tuesday convicted three men of arson in an…
A new twist on the flower scene: wood flowers!

Introducing a Fresh Take on Floral Decor: Wooden Flowers!

Berlin, New Jersey — It all started with a Facebook video and…
Congressional intern killed in Washington, D.C. shooting, police offer reward for multiple suspects

FBI Assists in Search Following Fatal Shooting of Congressional Intern in Washington, DC

The FBI has joined efforts to find who shot and killed a…
US will 'have to' send weapons to Ukraine, Trump says days after Pentagon pause

Trump Asserts US Must Resume Weapons Deliveries to Ukraine Following Pentagon Delay

On Monday, President Donald Trump announced that his administration plans to send…

Reality TV Star and Model, 32, Found Deceased Alone After 20 Days

A well-known reality television star was sadly discovered deceased in her apartment,…
US adults want the government to focus on child care costs, not birth rates, AP-NORC poll finds

AP-NORC Poll Reveals US Adults Prioritize Child Care Costs Over Birth Rates

WASHINGTON (AP) — As the Trump administration considers strategies to motivate more…