A remarkable case has emerged involving a great-grandmother who ended her husband’s life by suffocating him with a pillow after enduring over 50 years in a stifling marriage. A recent review sheds light on this tragic event.

Janet Dunn was driven to take drastic action against her husband, Anthony Dunn, in their Ponteland, Northumberland residence, following decades of oppression by her controlling spouse.

In August 2022, at the age of 73, Dunn received a prison sentence of five years and three months after admitting to manslaughter charges at Newcastle Crown Court.

The catalyst for the confrontation occurred in March 2022 when the couple faced yet another financial predicament, threatening their home with repossession.

During a discussion about borrowing money again from their daughter, her 81-year-old husband, who was in poor health and beginning to show signs of dementia, merely smiled.

Judge Paul Sloan QC, presiding over the case at Newcastle, remarked, “After a lifetime of compliance, it was that smile that triggered your breaking point. Years of suppressed anger and frustration finally erupted.”

Dunn put a pillow over husband and held it for at least two minutes. When she knew he was dead, she fled the house and attempted suicide at Bolam Lake, Northumberland. 

A Domestic Homicide Review, which examined the circumstances surrounding Mr Dunn’s death, revealed the decades of controlling behaviour Dunn experienced before she ‘snapped’.

Janet Dunn (pictured) killed Anthony Dunn at their home in Northumberland following years of suffering caused by her coercive husband

The report showed Dunn failed to recognise herself as a victim of such abuse, highlighting difficulties older victims face when seeking help. 

Dunn, who worked at a planning office, first met her to-be husband in the 1960s when he worked in a planning consultancy. 

Dunn fell pregnant while unmarried and was sent to a mother and baby unit in Cumbria with plans for her child to be adopted. 

However the couple decided to keep the child, and went on to have two more children. 

After the birth of their first daughter, Dunn gave up her career to be her husband’s secretary. 

Dunn’s daughter, who contributed to the review, said she believed their father had expected his wife to work for him and kept a significant hold over the business.

She said: ‘Although my mother assisted my father, I got the impression that he was in control of the business and not my mother. 

‘It appeared to me that my mother was subservient and would acquiesce to my father’s wishes.’

The family relocated to Darras Hill, Ponteland, Northumberland in 1986 and were described as being ‘very private’ but seemingly happily married. 

Dunn was jailed for five years and three months in August 2022 after pleading guilty to manslaughter at Newcastle Crown Court

Mr Dunn was described as being ‘charismatic, persuasive, and highly focused on work’ by a former colleague, while multiple people portrayed Dunn as ‘quiet and compliant’, choosing to ‘avoid conflict’.

However Mr Dunn was hiding financial difficulties, causing him to frequently borrow money from family and colleagues, and remortgage the house without Dunn’s knowledge.

He was declared bankrupt on two separate occasions. 

One daughter said in the review: ‘I would hear them arguing with one another a lot although they would make a genuine effort to shield us from them. 

‘But you could often hear them angrily whispering to each other. I have no idea what their arguments were about. As a result, there seemed to be a constant tension in the house. 

‘It appeared to me that the arguments were usually initiated by my mother frustrated about something my father had done. 

‘Although I didn’t often know what they were arguing about, I always felt that there was some merit to why my mother was upset with my father.’ 

Their daughter also recounted her experiences of her father’s domineering behaviour. 

Police had been called to Beech Court, in the exclusive area of Ponteland, Northumberland (pictured) in March 2022, to a report of concern for the welfare of a man and when emergency services arrived they found Mr Dunn, who was confirmed dead at the scene

She said: ‘My father was very controlling. He complained about what I wore, my weight, my worldview and the type of people that I associated with. 

‘Also my father had no qualms about imposing his opinion on me or shouting at me when he had something to say. However I wouldn’t argue back because I was very timid.’

One of Dunn’s daughters explained how her father would make grand promises, such as offering to buy them houses and cars, but these would often fall through. 

The daughters even had to settle debts with bailiffs who arrived at their home due to an unpaid council tax bill. 

The report indicates the couple became increasingly isolated after Dunn was diagnosed with a non-aggressive form of leukaemia in 2011, and Mr Dunn stopped work during the pandemic. 

The chair of the review interviewed Dunn, who revealed she had attempted to leave her husband multiple times but was always forced to return due to a lack of ‘resources’ to go.

The couple had no contact with services, apart from routine health checks, in the lead-up to the attack. 

In one occasion, Dunn visited her GP after suffering from headaches and told her doctor there was heightened stress at home. 

Mr Dunn’s health deteriorated in 2022, leading to Dunn frequently asking her daughters to borrow money; being contacted about unpaid council tax; and being chased by an associate of her husband for the repayment of a loan.

One of her daughters also passed away during this time. 

After her husband’s death, Dunn described their financial situation as the most severe it had been. 

Mr Dunn’s body was found by the couples daughter who lived with them. 

Dunn was initially charged with murder, but a guilty pleas to manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility was accepted by prosecutors. 

The review found Dunn ‘did not recognise his behaviours as abusive’ and was unaware of the support that was available to her, such as services for women and girls in abusive relationships. 

However Dunn noted she hadn’t identified her husband’s actions as coercice, controlling or abusive, and believed ‘such services would only be for women suffering physical abuse.’

The report said: ‘The control (Anthony) had over (Dunn) developed over a five-decade period acted as a significant barrier to identifying and reporting coercive control.

‘(Dunn) was isolated and did not have significant friendships outside of the marriage due to (Anthony) discouraging them. This was reinforced by belief in social attitudes to family and marriage, and possibly assumptions of what constituted domestic abuse being internalised in the late 1960s. 

‘(Dunn) feared “shame” in relation to divorce, debt, asking for loans from family, and losing the family home, and could not envisage being able to survive without (Anthony).’

It included a series of recommendations, including ensuring that awareness of the increased risk of domestic and economic abuse in older people.

A spokesperson for Safer Northumberland Partnership said: ‘The partnership has carefully considered all of the learning arising from this Domestic Homicide Review. 

‘Since publication, we have strengthened professional training on domestic abuse in older people, launched new public-awareness materials, and improved signposting to financial and welfare support for vulnerable residents.’