Trump DOJ says National Guard deployment in LA is 'unreviewable' in appeals court hearing
Share this @internewscast.com

SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — During a courtroom session on Tuesday, federal judges seemed to lean towards agreeing with the Trump administration’s stance regarding the deployment of California National Guard troops by President Trump without prior notification to Governor Gavin Newsom.

In a crucial online hearing before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the Department of Justice contended that President Donald Trump lawfully utilized his executive authority to dispatch troops to support the protection of federal officers and infrastructures during immigration enforcement protests in Los Angeles.

Just last Thursday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, based in San Francisco, ruled temporarily in favor of California to reinstate Governor Newsom’s control over the National Guard. However, only hours afterward, appellate judges issued a temporary halt on Breyer’s decision, setting the stage for their Tuesday session.

PREVIOUS: Trump can keep National Guard in LA for now after appeals court blocks order

The lawsuit was filed last Monday after President Trump issued a Saturday memo to the Department of Defense ordering “at least” 2,000 National Guard members for 60 days minimum.

Brett Shumate, a U.S. attorney representing Trump, said Breyer’s order interferes with the commander-in-chief’s executive power.

“It upends the military chain of command. It gives state governors veto power over the president’s military orders,” he said. “Courts don’t just defer to the president’s judgment – they don’t review the president’s judgment.”

The panel of three judges – including two Trump appointees – pushed back on the DOJ’s assertion, asking the Trump administration hypothetical questions about how far this lack of judicial review could go.

“If a hypothetical future president made the decision to call up in response the militia of every state and the District of Columbia, so 51 militia, would it also be your view that that decision by this hypothetical future president would be entirely unreviewable?” Judge Mark Bennett, a 2018 Trump appointee, asked.

“Yes, because the statute says the president may call into federal service members and units of the guard of any state in such numbers that he considers necessary,” Shumate responded.

Sam Harbourt with the California Department of Justice argued Trump’s deployment was “extreme” and defies precedent.

“Every day that this order remains in effect, it is causing harm to our nation’s broader democratic tradition of separation of the military from civilian affairs,” he said.

MORE: CA Sen. Alex Padilla, Democrats write letter to Pres. Trump to remove military from Los Angeles

Additionally, California argued the president violated the law by not directly contacting Newsom about his deployment. The statute in question allows federal use of state National Guard troops under certain circumstances and that orders doing so shall be issued “through the governors” of such states. Judges appeared skeptical of this point.

“Where does the statute say that issuing it ‘through the governor’ requires either the governor’s consent or requires consultation?” Bennett asked Harbourt.

“We take it from the plain meaning of through the governor,” Harbourt responded. “We think at a minimum, that means that the governor needs to be informed of it and given the chance to issue it.”

Additionally, the state said Trump’s actions are harming California, since those National Guard members would otherwise be working on wildfire prevention efforts as the state heads into peak wildfire season – a point Newsom made in an earlier statement Tuesday.

MORE: CAL FIRE is hiring: Newsom ramping up recruitment as Nat’l Guard firefighting capacity drops

“President Trump’s illegal militarization of Los Angeles is sidelining crucial firefighting and prevention resources,” the governor said. “It’s time to end the chaos and get California’s National Guard back to this important work.”

The judges did not signal how soon they may issue a decision.

Constitutional law professor Rory Little of UC Law San Francisco said the panel’s questions during Tuesday’s hearings were telling.

“Honestly, I’m not sure the court is receptive to the California position. It sounded to me like this could be a reversal of the district court. This could be affirming of the Trump administration’s position, at least at this preliminary stage,” he said.

Little noted that all action in the courts so far has been preliminary. If the appellate court decides to permanently reverse Judge Breyer’s initial temporary restraining order, the National Guard would remain in Trump’s control for at least 60 days.

“If California wins today, that case will go up to the Supreme Court,” he said. “I think if California loses today, it’ll still go to the Supreme Court.”

Copyright © 2025 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like
Hakeem Jeffries Reemerges, Doubles Down on Democrats' Big Lie About OBBB and the American Dream

Hakeem Jeffries Resurfaces, Reinforces Democrats’ False Narrative on OBBB and the American Dream

The Democrats tell dishonest statements so often, it’s hard sometimes to rank…
Man in a black jacket holding a red chainsaw.

Elon Musk Unveils New Political Party to Restore American ‘Freedom’ Following Fallout with Trump and Departure from White House

ELON Musk has launched a new political following his explosive row with…
Mexico President Sheinbaum hopes deported boxer Chávez Jr. will serve time in Mexico

Mexican President Sheinbaum Wishes for Deported Boxer Chávez Jr. to Face Justice in Mexico

Mexico City — President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico stated on Friday that…
Police: Woman shot at Jacksonville Red Roof Inn hotel; suspect outstanding

Shooting at Mississippi Way Block Party Sends 2 to Hospital, Says LCPD

The Lake City Police Department says officers found multiple spent shell casings…
Houston-born Heart O' the Hills camp director dies in Kerr County floods

Director of Heart O’ the Hills Camp, a Native Houstonian, Passes Away in Kerr County Flooding

“We are mourning the loss of a woman who influenced countless lives…
Jason Kelce slammed for 'tone deaf' Fourth of July post about setting aside differences: 'Privilege is showing'

Jason Kelce Criticized for ‘Insensitive’ Independence Day Post on Setting Aside Differences: ‘Shows Privilege’

Jason Kelce encountered criticism on social media following his remarks urging people…
Texas floods kill at least 24; search for missing continues

At Least 24 Dead in Texas Floods; Search for Missing People Ongoing

The destructive force of the fast-rising waters just before dawn Friday washed…
Missouri judge again blocks many of the state's anti-abortion laws

Missouri Judge Repeatedly Blocks Several State Anti-Abortion Laws

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — On Thursday, a Missouri judge halted numerous…
Tom Brady parties with Dakota Johnson, Kate Hudson on yacht

Tom Brady Celebrates on a Yacht with Dakota Johnson and Kate Hudson

Summer’s here — and these stars are sizzling. Tom Brady was seen…
South Philly shooting today: At least 8 wounded in mass shooting inside 7 Elements Restaurant Bar and Lounge in Philadelphia, PA

8 Injured in Mass Shooting at South Philly’s 7 Elements Restaurant Bar and Lounge Today

PHILADELPHIA — Eight people were wounded in a mass shooting early Saturday…
Multiple arrested as anti-ICE protesters clash with police, US troops in Los Angeles

Numerous Arrests at Los Angeles Protest as Anti-ICE Demonstrators Face Off with Police and US Troops

On Friday, several individuals were taken into custody in Los Angeles as…
What Movie Should I Watch Tonight? ‘Dances with Wolves’ Extended Cut on HBO Max

Looking for a Movie to Watch Tonight? Check Out the Extended Version of ‘Dances with Wolves’ on HBO Max

This Fourth of July, take a moment to remember the Kevin Costner…