Christchurch shooter to remain behind bars for life

In a decisive ruling, New Zealand’s Court of Appeal has dismissed Brenton Tarrant’s attempt to revoke his guilty pleas, a move he claimed was due to the harsh conditions of his imprisonment. The panel of three judges found his argument to be “utterly devoid of merit,” effectively shutting down his bid to retract his admissions.

Brenton Tarrant, who is now 35 years old, carried out a horrific attack in March 2019, taking the lives of 51 worshippers and injuring many others. Armed with semi-automatic weapons, he targeted two mosques in Christchurch during Friday prayers, leaving a deep scar on the community.

Christchurch mosque gunman Brenton Tarrant listens to victim impact statements during his sentencing hearing at Christchurch High Court. (Getty)

In March 2020, Tarrant pleaded guilty to charges of terrorism, murder, and attempted murder. This decision was met with relief by the families and survivors of the victims, who were spared the ordeal of a protracted trial. They had feared that such a trial might have given Tarrant a platform to propagate his extremist ideology.

Subsequently, Tarrant was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, reflecting the gravity of his crimes. His recent appeal attempt, filed a staggering 505 days past the legal deadline, has now been conclusively denied, thus preventing any chance of the case being reopened in court.

He was sentenced to life without parole on the murder, attempted murder and terrorism offences.

The rejection of his appeal bid – which the court noted was made 505 days after the legal deadline for it to be filed – means such a trial has once again been averted.

Tarrant, now aged 35, murdered 51 worshippers and injured dozens more in March 2019. (AAP)

His claim of mental illness was rejected

At the court’s five-day hearing in February, the attacker argued his admissions of guilt were provoked by “irrationality” induced by poor mental health, which led him to desert his racist views for a time.

The judges concluded, however, that his claims of mental illness were inconsistent and weren’t supported by prison staff, mental health professionals or lawyers who had earlier represented him.

“He was not suffering from a mental impairment or any other form of mental incapacity which rendered him unable to voluntarily change his pleas to guilty,” the judges wrote in today’s ruling.

“He endeavoured to mislead us about his state of mind in a weak attempt to advance an appeal in circumstances where all other evidence demonstrated that he made an informed and totally rational decision to plead guilty.”

The court’s ruling also revealed that Tarrant sought to abandon his appeal shortly after making his case at the hearing in February.

The judges rejected that bid too, writing that the case was “of significant public interest and should be finally determined”.

They suggested that Tarrant “began to form the opinion that the hearing was not proceeding in his favour, and as a result decided to file a notice of abandonment after the hearing concluded”.

New Zealand law doesn’t require judges to allow an appellant to quit an appeal bid once it’s underway.

190614 Christchurch mosque shootings Brenton Tarrant court not guilty plea crime news World New Zealand Australia
Tarrant was sentenced to life without parole on the murder, attempted murder and terrorism offences. (AP/AAP)

He will remain in jail for life

Tarrant, who has since fired the lawyers acting for him in February, remains in Auckland Prison, where he was sentenced in August 2020 to spend life in prison without the chance of parole.

The judges allowed him to abandon his appeal to that sentence, which was scheduled to be heard later in 2026.

The Australian-born man moved to New Zealand in 2017 with a plan to commit a mass shooting.

He amassed a cache of weapons and made a reconnaissance trip to the sites of his planned crimes before the attack.

The appeal court judges wrote that Tarrant had accepted the summary of facts presented to him by the police and the sentencing judge and noted that the case against him was “overwhelming.”

Evidence included footage of the attack that the shooter filmed himself and livestreamed on the internet, in which he showed his own face, and a document outlining his racist views that he published online before the attacks under his real name.

NEVER MISS A STORY: Get your breaking news and exclusive stories first by following us across all platforms.

If you or someone you know is in need of support, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or Beyond Blue.

You May Also Like

Teen Detained Following Threat to Stab Woman Over School Wake-Up Call

Staff Report NEWBERRY, Fla. – An 18-year-old named Jackell A. Harris was…

DOJ Dismisses ‘Selective Prosecution’ Defense in High-Profile Jan. 6 Rioter Case

Rioters trying to enter the Capitol building through the front doors in…

Shocking Arrest: Armed Man Detained for Alleged Threats Against Former Prince Andrew

A man has been arrested on suspicion of possessing an offensive weapon…

Police Report: Fatal Incident Claims Lives of Teen and Woman Following Pickup Soccer Game Dispute

Inset, left to right: Savanah Villarreal (WOOD) and Jeremiah Cuevas-Griffin (WXMI). Background:…

Gainesville Resident Faces 7-Year Federal Sentence for Drug and Weapon Offenses

Staff Report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Khalil Keari Barnett, aged 30, has been…

Shocking Incident: Daycare Worker Accused of Abusing Infant Caught on Camera

Inset: Alyssa Thompson (Columbia County Sheriff”s Office). Background: The daycare center where…

Gunmen Convicted for Fatal Attack on Notorious Gang Leader

Two men who gunned down gangland figure Gavin Preston have been found…

Intruder Fatally Attacks Ex-Wife’s Partner in Domestic Dispute

Share A promising talent in California’s boxing scene met a tragic end…

Teen Allegedly Attacks Father After Near Miss with Woman’s Car: Police Report

Background: The Bingham County Courthouse in Blackfoot, Idaho (Google Maps). Inset: Thomas…