The devastating fire that swept through the affluent Pacific Palisades area of Los Angeles was fueled by access restrictions intended to safeguard endangered plant species. These restrictions, criticized as “woke laws,” hindered firefighters’ efforts to combat the blaze.
A class action lawsuit, representing over 3,000 individuals, brought to light text exchanges and avoidance maps during court proceedings. These documents indicated that officials from state parks prioritized the protection of rare plants when dealing with the Lachman Fire on January 1, 2024.
Initially thought to be contained within Topanga State Park, the Lachman Fire flared back to life six days later, transforming into the Palisades Fire. This inferno, ignited on January 7, raged for 24 days, devastating the upscale Pacific Palisades community along the coast.
The fire claimed the lives of 12 people, razed 7,000 homes, and inflicted $150 billion in damages. Occurring alongside the equally destructive Eaton Fire, the situation stretched Los Angeles’ emergency resources to their breaking point.
Lawyers argued that State Park Officials obstructed the Los Angeles Fire Department’s efforts to fully extinguish the Lachman Fire, all in a bid to protect the endangered milkvetch plants thriving in the area.
According to messages obtained by NewsNation, park employees discussed strategies to shield these plants even as the Lachman Fire blazed.
‘There is federally endangered astragalus along the Temescal fire road. Would be nice to avoid cutting it if possible,’ one state park official wrote.
‘Do you have avoidance maps?’
New details have emerged after texts show State Park Officials were worried about endangered plants during the initial response of the Lachman fire
The State Park Officials were protecting the milkvetch plants which were growing in the region
‘I have a couple of READS on standby. I’ll wait to deploy them until you get on scene and assess the situation.’
The official added: ‘Definitely will want to send them down if heavy equipment arrives.’
These maps laid out where the designated avoidance areas were, and firefighters, as part of the state’s wildfire mitigation plan, are instructed to restrict operations in the region in an effort to preserve the sites.
The Palisades Fire reignited within one of the restricted avoidance areas, according to The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
Governor Gavin Newsom’s office denied that state park employees were in charge at the burn site, instead blaming another agency.
‘The notion that State Parks favors plants over people is ludicrous,’ a spokesperson for California State Parks said in a statement to the LA Times.
‘State Parks never hinders an active firefighting response, and firefighting decisions are up to the responding agency.
‘In this instance, the fire in question was deemed by LAFD to be fully contained a few hours after an arsonist started it.’
Join the debate
Should protecting endangered plants ever take priority over saving homes and lives during wildfires?
Governor Gavin Newsom’s office initially denied that any California officials were on the scene until changing their response to that they were not in charge
Contradictory photos shows state park officials at the Topanga State Park with firefighters
One of the text read: ‘There is federally endangered astragalus along the Temescal fire road. Would be nice to avoid cutting it if possible’
Jonathan Rinderknecht, 29, was charged with starting the catastrophic blaze that destroyed thousands of homes and buildings.
But Attorney Roger Behle, representing the 3,000 claimants, refuted the state’s claim to NewsNation: ‘The state’s narrative that they had nothing to do with it, and it’s some other agency’s fault, it’s their responsibility, it’s not ours, flies in the face of the evidence.’
Behle cited photo evidence contradicting Newsom’s office’s claims.
The suit also alleges that the state of California failed to monitor the Lachman fire adequately.
More revealing texts indicated that firefighters warned it was ‘a bad idea’ to leave the smoldering fire. However, they were ordered to leave the scene.
The damning evidence joins a laundry list of failures alleged against the state’s response to the fires.
Jonathan Rinderknecht, 29, was charged with starting the catastrophic blaze that destroyed thousands of homes
The Lachman fire was believed to have been extinguished until six days later, it reignited into the the Palisades fire which killed 12 people
The Los Angeles Police Department released an embarrassing report on its response to the fires, putting pressure on city leaders.
Cops released their findings on November 4 after a damning inquiry which found breakdowns in communication, specifically with the Los Angeles Fire Department.
The 92-page review sought to identify areas for improvement but also noted the courageous efforts of emergency responders.
The findings were presented to the Police Commission at the civilian oversight panel’s public meeting on Tuesday, according to the Los Angeles Times.
The report found firefighters lacked enough resources and struggled to communicate clearly in the first 36 hours of the blaze, and that those challenges hampered their response during a critical time.
It said the department did not pre-deploy enough resources despite warnings of severe winds.
The Palisades fire went on to become one of the most destructive wildfires in Los Angeles’ history.
The Eaton Fire broke out the same day in thecommunity of Altadena, destroying more than 9,400 homes and killing 19 people.
