From the onset of his political journey, Donald Trump has set himself apart with an unvarnished presence and a penchant for delivering messages that often leave jaws dropping due to their unscripted nature.
While this approach has sparked debates for more than a decade, Trump’s recent statements on Truth Social have confounded even his loyal followers. In a series of posts, he made incendiary comments about a potential conflict with Iran, expressing threats to obliterate the nation’s civilization and bizarrely ending with “praise be to Allah.”
Weeks after these erratic posts made their rounds, officials from the White House revealed to the Wall Street Journal that the posts were intentionally crafted to appear as erratic and provocative as possible, with the aim of pressuring Iran into negotiations.
One particularly notorious message was posted on Easter Sunday, where he declared: “Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped in one, in Iran.”
He further warned, “There will be nothing like it!!! Open the F***in’ Strait, you crazy b*****ds, or you’ll be living in Hell – JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah,” words that sparked significant controversy.
The backlash was swift and fierce. Numerous Democrats responded by suggesting the potential use of the 25th Amendment, which provides a mechanism to declare a president incapable of fulfilling the duties of the office.
One advisor told the Wall Street Journal that Trump said he came up with the idea himself, adding that he used language he thought Iranians would understand.
However, the president was reportedly concerned about the fallout, asking his advisors: ‘How’s it playing?’
Donald Trump, pictured above on March 11, reportedly posted bizarre rants on social media in an effort to appear ‘unstable’ to motivate Iran to negotiate
The Trump administration has defended military action in Iran. Pictured above are airstrikes in Tehran on March 7
Trump, pictured above on April 6, reportedly came up with the controversial ‘Praise be to Allah’ post on his own, according to new reporting
Two days later, Trump issued a chilling warning that caused even more backlash, threatening Iran that a ‘whole civilization’ would die if negotiations were unsuccessful.
‘I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS?’ he continued.
‘We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the world. 47 years of extortion, corruption, and death, will finally end. God Bless the Great People of Iran!’
He stood by the threats, appearing on Fox News shortly after to reiterate that he was ‘fine’ with the post’s message.
‘Remember, what do they say to us? For years, I’ve had to listen to them say, “Death to America,’ right?”‘ Trump told Fox host Maria Bartiromo.
‘So they’re allowed to say, ‘Death to America,” And what I’m referring and when I talk about civilization, it’ll be much different, because their military will be totally gone.’
A day after the post, sources told the Wall Street Journal that at a reception ahead of America’s 250th celebration, he told White House donors and staff that he deserved the Medal of Honor.
Trump has come under scrutiny for wild Truth Social posts, including one above depicting an artificial intelligence generated image seemingly showing him as Jesus
The president reportedly cited a story from his first term in office about flying into Iraq to visit the troops. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later said he was joking.
Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer called Trump ‘extremely sick’ for the threats, and Senator Patty Murray said the president was exhibiting ‘rantings of a bloodthirsty lunatic.’
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Trump’s ‘inability is more clear and dangerous than ever,’ and called on the Cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment.
Leila Sadat, a professor of international criminal law at Washington University Law School, described the threat to The Atlantic as ‘basically an announcement that I’m about to commit war crimes at the very least—and possibly crimes against humanity and, in a worst-case scenario, genocide.’
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, pictured above on April 14, reportedly said he believed Trump’s strong language might bring Iranians to the negotiating table
Trump’s military crusade in Iran has caused widespread backlash. Pictured above are protesters at a demonstration in Los Angeles on April 7
Genocide scholars, military attorneys and human-rights lawyers voiced concern that the threat was in violation of Article II, Section 4 of the United Nations Charter, which prohibits the ‘threat or use of force’ against other nations.
However, White House aides reportedly saw the post as an attempt to motivate negotiations with Iran.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio had said he believed the strong language might bring Iranians to the table, according to the Wall Street Journal’s reporting.
Advisors also told the publication that Trump was hoping to scare the Iranians and end the conflict abroad.
The Trump administration has stood firm in favor of the military pursuit in Iran. Leavitt said the president has ‘remained a steady leader our country needs.’
‘President Trump campaigned proudly on his promise to deny the Iranian regime the ability to develop a nuclear weapon, which is what this noble operation accomplishes,’ she added.
New polling indicates that the Trump administration does not have widespread American support for the war. Protesters are pictured above in Texas on April 7
The Trump administration has repeatedly indicated that an end to the war is coming soon. Pictured above is wreckage provided by Iran’s state media
Despite the administration’s steadfast support for the war, polling has indicated that the sentiment has not been felt nationwide.
New polling results from Politico showed that just 38 percent of Americans supported the strikes in Iran.
Nearly half of the respondents also said they believed Trump was spending too much time on international affairs rather than focusing on domestic issues.
Even though Trump cannot run for re-election, the polling could impact the midterms later this year.
Advisors told the Wall Street Journal that the midterms are still on his mind, and that in February, he told staff he ‘would have to eat dinner regardless’ when they asked whether a fundraising event should be canceled amid the war.
The Daily Mail has reached out to the White House for comment.
