Many observers were left dissatisfied with the conclusions, as the department had previously suggested there would be major revelations uncovered in their investigation of the convicted pedophile financier. Earlier, the Attorney General mentioned that the files “are sitting on my desk right now,” and noted that the FBI had delivered “truckloads” of information to her office, leading to expectations of significant new discoveries.

Among those dissatisfied is Alan Dershowitz, Professor Emeritus at Harvard Law School. Speaking on Sean Spicer’s podcast on Thursday, he expressed his frustration without holding back.

I know the names of the individuals [on the alleged client list].

I know why they’re being suppressed.

I know who’s suppressing them.

Whoa! Those are some pretty powerful claims.

“But I’m restricted by confidentiality orders from a judge and various cases, so I cannot reveal what I know,” he mentioned, pointing out that he had been falsely implicated as a client at one point. 

Watch:

Lawyer Alan Dershowitz says that he “knows the names” on the Epstein list and that the Epstein files are being “suppressed” to protect people. He says he’s bound to confidentiality and can’t share the names but that files and names DO exist. Wow.pic.twitter.com/q8CpyMLeFb

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) July 10, 2025

Judicial Watch Chairman Tom Fitton agrees:

I have no doubt there is an “Epstein Client List”–the only question is whether it is made public or not. @JudicialWatch FOIA lawsuit could be key to the truth. @IngrahamAngle @FoxNews. pic.twitter.com/ki7aHtitrG

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) July 10, 2025

Dershowitz, who, as he said, was once falsely accused in 2014 by Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre of being a client of the pervert, continued, throwing out stunner after stunner:

…hand to God, I know the names of people whose files are being suppressed in order to protect them, and that’s wrong.

Are they politicians, business leaders, who exactly? Spicer asked. Dershowitz answered that they were from many walks of life, but also noted that the alleged suppression of the files made it almost impossible for the wrongfully accused to fight back:

They’re everything.

And let me tell you, a lot of them are–at least for one of them as somebody who was accused–others are accused of it, and the judges have said, if somebody calls themselves a victim, we’re not gonna give any information about them. But they may not be victims. They may be perpetrators.

So we don’t have information about false accusers, and we know there have been many false accusers who have accused innocent people for money, and those records are being deliberately, willfully suppressed. And they shouldn’t be suppressed…

We want total transparency on this. Every single document, no redaction.

The sick Jeffrey Epstein case has transfixed Americans for going on two decades now, and many have found their trust in the authorities eroded because they don’t feel they’re being told the truth. If you believe Dershowitz, the story is far from dead.