In a significant development, a Brooklyn judge has ordered the release of Jacqueline Pritchett, who had been held in custody for two months. The 50-year-old woman had been detained after refusing to disclose any information about her missing autistic son, a situation the judge deemed as punishment for exercising her legal rights.

Despite her release, Pritchett is required to attend a Family Court session next week, where she will again face questioning regarding her son, Jacob Pritchett. Jacob, an 11-year-old who is nonverbal, has been missing since at least April, raising deep concerns among authorities and the community.

Jacqueline Pritchett, who has acknowledged struggles with mental health, had an encounter with police and a caseworker from the Administration for Children’s Services on October 1. They visited her Brownsville apartment following a tip-off about Jacob’s welfare. However, during the visit, Pritchett made bizarre claims, such as denying ever having children and asserting that she is Jesus Christ. She also suggested that the toys found in the apartment were hers, rather than belonging to a child, as reported by police sources and court documents.

The authorities are deeply worried about Jacob’s safety and suspect that he might have come to harm. In an effort to locate him, they have declared him missing and are appealing to the public for assistance. To aid in the search, they have distributed a police sketch and a computer-generated image of Jacob, along with a photograph of his mother, hoping for any leads that could shed light on his whereabouts.

Police believe harm has come to Jacob.

They have identified him as missing and asked for the public’s help in finding him, releasing to the media a police sketch of Jacob, a computer rendering of him and a photo of his mother.

After being taken to Brookdale Hospital for a psychiatric evaluation, the mother was jailed on a Family Court contempt warrant and has eight times refused to answer questions about Jacob, invoking her Fifth Amendment right to avoid saying anything that would incriminate her.

But on Tuesday Supreme Court Justice Margaret Martin said she agreed with the contention of Jacqueline Pritchett’s lawyers that Family Court Judge Dawn Orsatti unlawfully held Pritchett simply for her exercising her rights.

Pritchett, she said, was jailed based on her “good-faith assertion” that she has a right not to answer any questions.

“The petitioner is released,” Martin said. “She is to be released forthwith.”

Brian Holbrook, one of Jacqueline Pritchett’s lawyers, had no comment outside court.

A spokesman for the city Law Department, which had opposed Pritchett being released because it believes the Family Court contempt warrant was justified, said, “The city is evaluating next steps.”