A Detroit police officer stunned a judge after joining a virtual court hearing wearing his uniform shirt and badge—but noticeably lacking pants.
Officer Matthew Jackson of the Detroit Police Department participated in a Zoom session on Monday, related to a case involving disorderly conduct and drag racing, which involves cars racing over short distances. The session’s video, shared by the 36th District Court, captured the unusual attire.
The video has quickly become a viral sensation across various social media platforms.
In the footage, Detroit police officer Matthew Jackson is seen in the virtual courtroom on October 27, dressed in his official police shirt and badge, but wearing only dark-colored boxer shorts below. (36th District Court via Storyful)
The video footage reveals Jackson seated in front of the camera, sporting his police-issued button-up shirt and badge, paired with what seems to be dark boxer shorts.
An attorney on the call, visibly taken aback, reacted to the unusual sight, prompting Judge Sean Perkins to pause and incredulously ask, “You got some pants on, officer?”
“No, sir,” Jackson replied, before quickly adjusting his phone to shift the camera away from his legs.
Judge Sean Perkins looked confused after seeing an officer attend a virtual court hearing without pants. (36th District Court via Storyful)
Though clearly surprised, Judge Perkins attempted to continue with the proceeding without further comment. It remains unclear why Jackson appeared without pants during the hearing.
In a statement sent to Fox News Digital on Thursday, Detroit Police Chief Todd Bettison apologized on behalf of the department, calling the officer’s conduct “not representative of the professionalism” of the police department.
Police officer Matthew Jackson shifts camera away from his legs after a judge and attorney confronted him about his attire on Oct. 27.. (36th District Court via Storyful)
“The Detroit Police Department requires its officers to represent themselves in a dignified and professional manner while attending court proceedings,” Bettison said. “The involved officer’s actions are not representative of the professionalism of this department and will be appropriately addressed to maintain the public confidence and efficient operation of this department.”
“Our apologies are hereby extended to the judges and staff of the court, as well as anyone else who may have been in attendance during this incident.”
