Eric Andre Atlanta airport racial profiling lawsuit revived
Share this @internewscast.com

The 11th Circuit released a decision indicating that comedian André and actor Clayton English “plausibly alleged” their case against Clayton County.

ATLANTA — A federal appeals court has revived a lawsuit filed by comedian Eric André, which alleges racial profiling during a 2021 search at Atlanta’s airport.

The lawsuit, initiated in 2022, claimed that Clayton County Police subjected André to a “dehumanizing and demoralizing” search at the jet bridge as he was about to board a plane, which the department claimed was part of a strategy to deter drug trafficking.

Actor Clayton English, the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, claimed a similar experience in 2020. 

The Associated Press reported in 2022 that the lawsuit argued these searches seldom discovered drugs or led to criminal charges, but resulted in cash seizures that provided a “financial windfall” for the police department.

The department argued all stops were voluntarily agreed to, including André’s—describing their officers’ encounter with him as “pleasant” and claiming he consented to a search, which CCPD stated was never conducted because the officers “determined that the interaction did not warrant further inquiry.”

The lawsuit asserted that André only gave consent for a search because he felt he “had no other choice but to continue answering the officers’ questions, believing he was not free to leave.” 

He wrote afterward on social media that he wished the department “owned up to it instead of creating more lies about what happened.”

A federal district court decision had tossed the lawsuit, saying it failed to plausibly allege constitutional violations.

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta disagreed.

“We conclude, however, that plaintiffs plausibly alleged that Clayton County subjected them to unreasonable searches and seizures,” the opinion issued on Friday states.

Officers, the decision states, “simply walked up to André and ‘began challenging him with a series of questions,’ and they did not inform André he was free to leave until after they finished questioning him,” effecting the conditions for him to plausibly argue he was “seized” as a Fourth Amendment violation. 

English, whose luggage was in fact searched, further argued his consent to a search was coerced, which the appeals court found plausible.

As a result of finding a plausible Fourth Amendment violation, the 11th Circuit held that Clayton County did not have immunity from the lawsuit — but that the individual officers involved were entitled to qualified immunity.

The 11th Circuit decision also agreed with the district court that no 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause violation, alleging the searches were discriminatory, occurred. 

“In support of their equal-protection claims, plaintiffs cite their allegations of racial disparities in the execution of the drug interdiction program and that CCPD supervisors are aware of those disparities, but such allegations fail to state an equal protection claim against the defendants in this case,” the decision states. “Plaintiffs’ amended complaint is devoid of any allegations that any individual defendant acted with a discriminatory purpose.”

As a result of the 11th Circuit’s opinion, the lawsuit can proceed against Clayton County again on the alleged Fourth Amendment violation. It cannot proceed against the officers or pursue the 14th Amendment violation argument.

“In the United States, you may not be seized or have your belongings searched unless you truly voluntarily consent or the government has at least reasonable suspicion to justify the seizure. Never has that basic constitutional principle been more important,” Barry Friedman, the faculty director of the Policing Project at NYU Law and the attorney who made the oral argument in the case to the 11th Circuit, said in a statement. “We are glad that the federal court of appeals has reaffirmed that principle and recognized the validity of our clients’ Fourth Amendment claims. We look forward to returning to the trial court to learn even more about the Clayton County Police Department’s unconstitutional jet bridge stop program.”

The opinion was written by Judge Elizabeth L. Branch, a Trump appointee. According to a release from NYU Law, the appeal was supported by an amicus brief from actors and entertainers including Tyler Perry, Jamie Foxx, Taraji P. Henson and Sterling K. Brown. 

See the full opinion below:


Copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.     

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like
FBI opens investigation after driver allegedly rams ICE vehicle during Arizona traffic stop attempt

FBI Investigates After Driver Allegedly Collides with ICE Vehicle in Arizona Traffic Stop

In a startling event on Thursday morning, a vehicle carrying two Immigration…
Frantic manhunt launched after asylum seeker who sexually assaulted teen accidentally freed from prison

Intense Manhunt Underway: Asylum Seeker Mistakenly Released After Teen Sexual Assault Conviction

Criticism has been directed at the UK’s immigration system following the inadvertent…
Vermont police search for student who vanished from Middlebury College

Tragic Discovery: Missing Vermont Student Lia Smith’s Body Found Near Middlebury Campus

During the search for a missing Vermont college student, a body has…
CPS news: Some Chicago Board of Education members call for Chicago Public Sshools remote learning amid immigration operations

Chicago Board Members Urge CPS to Consider Remote Learning in Response to Immigration Actions

CHICAGO — A renewed push for remote learning in Chicago Public Schools…
‘Everything’s on the table’: Former detective breaks down murder of manager of famed strip club

Former Detective Analyzes High-Profile Murder of Renowned Strip Club Manager: ‘All Possibilities Considered

Authorities are delving into all potential motives behind the early-morning shooting that…
President Donald Trump says he's terminating all trade negotiations with Canada over anti-tariff television advertisement campaign

Trump Halts Trade Talks with Canada Following Controversial TV Ad Campaign

WASHINGTON — Late Thursday, President Donald Trump declared the termination of “all…
States worry about how to fill the gap in food aid ahead of a federal benefits halt

States Brace for Food Aid Crisis as Federal Benefits Set to Expire: Exploring Solutions to Bridge the Hunger Gap

Officials from Louisiana, Vermont, and Virginia have committed to ensuring that food…
Colts cheerleader uses sign language to converse with deaf fan at his first game

Heartwarming Moment: Colts Cheerleader Bridges the Gap with Sign Language at Deaf Fan’s First Game

Colts cheerleader Morgan McLain, who studied American Sign Language (ASL) as a…
Man shot 10 times protecting high school cheerleader who died after shooting at bonfire: report

Heroic Act: Man Fatally Shot Defending Cheerleader at Tragic Bonfire Incident

An Alabama resident claims he endured ten gunshot wounds while attempting to…
Hilary Duff sobs after spilling coffee all over her Balenciaga bag

Hilary Duff’s Coffee Spill Drama: Balenciaga Bag Mishap Sparks Emotional Reaction

Hilary Duff recently shared an emotional moment with her followers, posting a…
United States Department of Justice appealing dismissal of sanctuary city policy lawsuit against Illinois, Cook County, Chicago

U.S. Department of Justice to Challenge Dismissal of Sanctuary City Policy Lawsuit Against Illinois, Cook County, and Chicago

The U.S. Department of Justice is challenging a court decision concerning a…
Families outraged after high school student in violent sex assault cases avoids prison as youthful offender

Community Outrage Erupts: High School Student Escapes Prison Despite Violent Assault Charges

The community of Payne County, Oklahoma, is in an uproar as parents…