Erika Kirk and Candace Owens have agreed to pause their public clash and move behind closed doors for a one-on-one meeting about the assassination of Charlie Kirk, after Owens publicly alleged that a top Turning Point USA figure told her Charlie warned, “They are going to kill me,” the night before he was murdered.

On the Jimmy Dore Show, Owens emphatically stated that she could say “1000%” Andrew Kolvet had told her the night before Charlie’s murder that Charlie Kirk texted him saying, “They are going to kill me.” She added that Kolvet was the one who received the text message from Kirk with that exact warning, stressing that she got this information directly from him. Kolvet had asked her to keep it off the record until Erika’s public comments implied Owens’ account was false.

In a recent conversation with Dore, Owens raised concerns about conflicting accounts regarding the events surrounding Kirk’s death. She pointed out that either Andrew Kolvet or Erika Kirk is not being truthful, as she did not personally receive the disputed text message. Owens mentioned that another source from Turning Point USA indicated that staffer Dan Flood received the same alarming message. Owens described Kolvet’s demeanor as genuinely worried, suggesting it was unlikely he fabricated the story shortly after Kirk’s passing.

Amid the controversy sparked by Owens’ statements and Erika’s public denials of any warning texts on Charlie’s phone, Erika announced on social media platform X that she and Owens would engage in a private, in-person discussion on December 15. The two have agreed to pause all public discussions, livestreams, and social media interactions until after their meeting, with Erika expressing hope for a constructive dialogue.

Owens replied in her own post, expressing her eagerness for the meeting. She plans to directly address her questions to Erika, rather than retract her claims about Kolvet’s statements. For Owens and her supporters, resolving the discrepancy between Kolvet’s alleged remarks and the public denials from Erika and TPUSA is crucial to determining the truth about Charlie’s last moments.

The decision to temporarily halt public exchanges highlights the potential significance of the upcoming meeting. If Owens and Erika can agree on the facts surrounding the alleged “They are going to kill me” text, it could either support Owens’ allegations that insiders need to be more forthcoming or demand accountability from Kolvet and others involved.

Should the meeting fail to bring clarity, the disagreement may further polarize the official narrative and the independent investigation Owens is championing. This ongoing tension keeps the pressure on Turning Point USA and federal authorities to offer a complete account of what Kirk was aware of, whom he confided in, and why he feared for his life.

Erika Announces Private Meeting, Owens Embraces It

Following the backlash to Owens’ revelations and Erika’s media tour denying any such death warning existed on Charlie’s phone, Erika announced on X that “Candace Owens and I are meeting for a private, in-person discussion on Monday, December 15.” She said she and Owens “have agreed that public discussions, livestreams, and tweets are on hold until after this meeting,” and said she looks forward to a “productive conversation.”

Owens responded in her own post that she is “very much looking forward to this discussion,” signaling she intends to bring her questions directly to Erika rather than backing off the Kolvet claims. For Owens and her supporters, reconciling what Kolvet allegedly said with what Erika and TPUSA are now saying in public is a central test of who is being truthful about Charlie’s final hours.

A Pivotal Moment for the Kirk Narrative

The agreed pause on livestreams and social-media crossfire until after the sit-down underscores how decisive this meeting could be. If Erika and Owens can align on basic facts about the alleged “They are going to kill me” text, it will either vindicate Owens’ insistence that key insiders have more to answer for or force a direct accounting from Kolvet and others.

If no clarity emerges, the dispute will likely deepen the split between an official, institution-friendly narrative and the independent, populist investigation Owens is helping drive—keeping pressure on Turning Point USA and federal authorities to fully explain what Kirk knew, who he confided in, and why he believed someone was coming to kill him.