Share this @internewscast.com

WASHINGTON — After supporters of then-President Donald Trump stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, ominous fencing was erected to protect surrounding buildings.

One of the buildings that needed protecting was the grand marble structure across the street from the Capitol: the Supreme Court.

But during oral arguments on Thursday over Colorado’s effort to kick Trump off the Republican primary ballot, the justices asked little about a key question in the case: Was Jan. 6 an insurrection?

Instead, the court looks likely to rule in favor of Trump on other grounds, allowing the justices to avoid taking sides on such a contentious issue.

Based on the two-hour oral argument, it appeared there was a majority that would find that states do not have the authority to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars people who previously held government positions and “engaged in insurrection” from holding federal office.

Justices asked questions on all manner of legal technicalities, including whether the president is covered by Section 3 and whether Congress needs to pass legislation to enforce it. In skirting the insurrection question, they also probed who gets to decide whether an insurrection took place, with several suggesting states should not have that power.

The only justice to directly press the insurrection question was Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a liberal appointed by President Joe Biden.

Jackson asked Trump’s lawyer, Jonathan Mitchell, whether he would concede that his client had engaged in insurrection.

Mitchell pushed back, saying, “President Trump did not engage in any act that can be plausibly characterized as insurrection.”

An insurrection, he added, “needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the United States through violence.”

Jackson appeared incredulous at the narrow definition of the term.

“So your point is that a chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection?” she asked.

“This was a riot. It was not an insurrection,” Mitchell responded.

In finding that Trump was ineligible, the Colorado Supreme Court held that Section 3 does apply to the president and that Trump had engaged in insurrection.

Previously, a lower court judge had ruled that there was an insurrection but concluded that Section 3 could not be enforced.

That followed a five-day hearing in a lower state court in which evidence that was submitted included Trump’s tweets, videos of the events of Jan. 6 and the report issued by the now-defunct House committee that investigated the attack.

One recurring theme during the Supreme Court arguments Thursday was the sense of unease on the bench at the idea of the justices having to review a flurry of state court rulings like the one in Colorado barring not just Trump but future presidential candidates from running for office based on claims that they were involved in an insurrection.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, one of Trump’s three appointees to the court, wondered how the justices were supposed to review the evidence that Colorado courts relied on in concluding there was an insurrection.

She wondered if the justices might have to “watch the video of the Ellipse” and draw their own conclusions, a reference to Trump’s speech on Jan. 6 in which he encouraged his supporters to march to the Capitol.

Justice Samuel Alito, a fellow conservative, seemed to be thinking along similar lines.

“Would we have to have our own trial?” he asked.

Alito was among several justices who expressed concern about other states reaching different conclusions to the Colorado courts, leading to a potentially chaotic election.

At times it appeared that the only person in the courtroom who wanted to speak about how to define an insurrection was Jason Murray, the lawyer representing Colorado voters who say Trump is ineligible.

“We are here because, for the first time since the War of 1812, our nation’s capitol came under violent assault,” he said during his opening remarks.

The attack, he added, “was incited by a sitting president of the United States to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power.”

As far as the Supreme Court is concerned, whether that constitutes an insurrection is likely to remain an open question.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like
‘River of Angels’ memorial rises in Kerrville as flood victims remembered

“‘River of Angels’ Memorial Erected in Kerrville to Honor Flood Victims”

KERR COUNTY, TEXAS – Over the past 72 hours, an expanding tribute…
Valley woman returns home months after fiery I-10 crash rescue

Local woman safely returns home months following dramatic I-10 crash recovery

Asharie Cheatham suffered burns to nearly a third of her body when…
Rotting toe found in box on Washington beach

Decaying Toe Discovered in Box on Washington Shoreline

A Tacoma, Washington, man found a gift-wrapped severed human toe while celebrating…
Gervonta Davis arrested in Miami on domestic violence charge

Gervonta Davis faces arrest in Miami for domestic violence allegations

Police say the charge was connected to an incident that occurred last…
Accused killer Vance Boelter hints at motive in Post jailhouse interview

Vance Boelter, accused of murder, suggests motive during jail interview with the Post

The man charged with the politically motivated murder of a Minnesota lawmaker…
Pope Leo XIV gives autographed jersey to White Sox player from 2005 World Series team

Pope Leo XIV Presents Signed Jersey to Member of the 2005 White Sox World Series Team

In a reversal of roles, a fan has signed a jersey for…
Parents face possible arrest, steep fines in military town's tough new approach to combat youth crime

Military Town Implements Strict Measures to Tackle Youth Crime, Including Potential Arrests and Fines for Parents

To curb rising youth violence, city leaders in Fayetteville, North Carolina, are…
Trump's Middle East tour begins with Syria looming as strategic opportunity

Activist Supports Trump’s Efforts for Israel-Syria Peace Agreement with Visit to Jerusalem

In an unprecedented visit to Israel’s parliament this week, Shadi Martini, a…
Portrait of Caroline Dinenage, Britain's culture minister, at the G20 Culture Ministers meeting.

Young people prioritize everyday concerns over trans discussions

YOUNG people are more worried about bread and butter issues than racism…
Mugshot of Sarah Grace Patrick.

Teenager’s Eerie Social Media Activity Before Being Charged with Killing Mom and Stepfather After Delivering Eulogy

A TEENAGE girl accused of murdering her mum and stepdad shared haunting…
Russia's Lavrov warns US against 'exploiting' alliances as he meets with Kim Jong Un in North Korea

Russia’s Lavrov Cautions US on ‘Abusing’ Alliances During Meeting with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov highlighted the “invincible fighting brotherhood” between Russia…
Carabinieri at a car accident scene.

Heartbreaking Image Surfaces After Airline CEO’s Wife Allegedly Hits Babysitter, 24; Lawyer Denies Her Fleeing the Scene

Heartbreaking images have surfaced from the devastating crash involving a CEO’s wife,…