On September 10, Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), was tragically shot and killed while attending “The American Comeback Tour” at Utah Valley University. The incident has sparked a wider conversation about the potential motivations behind such acts of violence. Dr. Wendy Patrick, a seasoned prosecutor and author, suggests that Kirk was not simply targeted for his outspoken views, but rather for the expansive reach of his message.

Dr. Patrick posits that the real threat may lie in the influence Kirk wielded, which could potentially drive political violence. “People were listening to the content of what Charlie Kirk had to say,” Patrick noted, emphasizing that his words resonated with audiences far beyond American borders.

Kirk’s impact was indeed global, as evidenced by the vigils held in his memory across various international cities, including London, Sydney, and Berlin. This widespread support underscores the far-reaching nature of his influence, which Dr. Patrick believes could have contributed to his being targeted.

In a testament to his enduring legacy, TPUSA reported that a memorial service held for Charlie Kirk at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, attracted between 90,000 to 100,000 attendees on September 21. This massive turnout highlights the significant role Kirk played in shaping political discourse, both domestically and internationally.

Dr. Wendy Patrick says Charlie Kirk was targeted not just for speaking, but for being heard. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

TPUSA reported Charlie Kirk’s memorial at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, drew 90,000-100,000 attendees on Sept. 21.

“They were curious in knowing what made someone like Charlie Kirk tick,” Patrick said. “Could it be that he was on to something that maybe was worthy of a little bit more exploration on their part?”

She also pointed out that while Kirk’s message wasn’t new, his method stood out. His goal, Patrick said, wasn’t to debate, but to converse with those who opposed his views graciously.

“What was new is the boldness, gentleness and graciousness with which Charlie Kirk was able to explain that,” Patrick said.

Dr. Wendy Patrick says Charlie Kirk’s influence and respectful debate style made him a global voice. (Dr. Wendy Patrick)

Commentators across the political spectrum acknowledged Kirk’s reach. Ezra Klein said in an opinion essay, “When the left thought its hold on the hearts and minds of college students was nearly absolute, Kirk showed up again and again to break it.”

An Network Contagion Research Institute study shows that widespread justification for lethal violence is increasing among left-aligned younger individuals.

“Assassination culture is spreading on the left,” Kirk posted on X months before his assassination.

For Patrick, Kirk didn’t just speak, people listened to a message that, she says, reached both minds and hearts.

She says that Charlie Kirk, “expressed a message that was not only interesting to listen to, but impactful to the hearts of the listeners.”