Share this @internewscast.com

By Dan Hannan

WHAT a humiliation. We have given Brussels everything it wanted and ended up paying for the privilege.

Sir Keir Starmer always hated Brexit. For three years, he campaigned to overturn the referendum.

Now, unable to go back in, has agreed that Brussels should set our laws from the outside.

We will remain a non-participating member, an obligatory market for EU exports, a source of fish for French and Spanish fishermen, and a provider of soldiers for EU missions, as well as subsidized university seats for the children of EU officials.

Britain will become the EU’s gimp, trussed up in black leather and zips, with a ball-gag in its mouth.

And all because, since 2016, Starmer has felt a deep emotional need to apologise on behalf of the British electorate.

To see how one-sided the agreement is, let’s think of what the two sides’ objectives were before.

The EU had an extensive agenda. Since Donald Trump essentially retracted the US security promise from Europe, EU leaders have sought Britain’s assistance—a nuclear nation with the most formidable military in the area—to help fill the gap.

They wanted continued access to the richest fishing grounds in Europe, something that was supposed to be phased out gradually after Brexit.

They wanted to send their unemployed youngsters here and to continue to educate their children at UK universities without paying overseas fees.

Most importantly, they aimed to influence our trade policy. The UK stands as their largest export destination for agricultural products. Their ongoing concern was that Britain could remove the barriers imposed by Brussels on non-EU imports, which are often portrayed as consumer protection measures but are primarily intended to limit competition.

If Britain were to follow the science and remove these barriers, it would cease to be a captive market. Beef from Australia, Uruguay, the US and Canada would replace imports from France and Ireland.

To prevent that outcome, it was not enough for Britain to adopt the same food standards as the EU. No, we had to cede control. We had to let the EU set our food standards in perpetuity.

The agreement just signed makes it impossible for British farmers to get a competitive edge in areas like gene editing. It could force us to undo the reforms we have made over the past four years and might threaten our existing trade deals.

So much for what the EU wanted. What of Britain?

Actually, our position was pretty comfortable. We already hadthe most comprehensive deal that the EU has with any state not in the process of joining it, with no tariffs or quotas. We had finally started to use our Brexit freedoms to be more competitive in fields like AI.

We had struck trade deals with the Pacific bloc, India and (much to Eurocrats’ annoyance) the US.

No, the only real irritation we had, a legacy of the Benn Surrender Act, when Europhile MPs prevented us from leaving the EU other than on terms that Brussels approved, was checks at the Irish border.

The only fair way to dismantle those checks was to agree a mutual recognition deal on food. We would accept stuff that the EU passed as fit, and they would do the same. Brussels has long had such a deal with New Zealand, and our standards are closer to its own than those of Kiwi exporters.

But mutual recognition would not keep the UK as a captive export market. So the EU held out for total control, what it called “dynamic alignment” (though few things are less dynamic than the EU).

Naturally, it has got its way. On this, as on every other issue, Labour has been reduced to pretending that, in giving in to the EU, it is somehow getting what it wanted all along.

Thus handing Brussels control of our regulations becomes “easier exports”.

Caving into EU demands on free movement becomes “a balanced youth experience scheme”. Though how anyone can justify giving EU students a better deal than Commonwealth students is utterly beyond me.

To see how totally we have caved in, consider what ministers are trumpeting as their big victory, namely the ability to use EU passport e-gates. It is extraordinary that this right was ever withdrawn. We have always allowed EU nationals to use our gates, and quite right, too: we want our airports to be efficient.

If the EU wants to treat e-gates as a bargaining chip, the bargain should be simple reciprocity: you use ours, we use yours. But, no, to get even something so basic, we make a bunch of unrelated concessions.

And to cap it all, we are paying the EU unspecified sums for accepting all these concessions.

That is what happens when our leaders can’t forgive us for Brexit. Labour negotiates, Britain loses.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like
New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani rallies voters with support from Bernie Sanders and AOC

Zohran Mamdani Gains Momentum in New York Mayoral Race with Endorsements from Bernie Sanders and AOC

In the bustling heart of New York City, a political rally on…
Ravens-Bears game today: Baltimore Ravens defeat Chicago Bears 30-16

Ravens Soar Over Bears: Baltimore Clinches Dominant 30-16 Victory – Game Highlights & Analysis

In an impressive display on Sunday, the Baltimore Ravens secured a commanding…
Drug vessel destroyed in explosive strike by US military

US Executes Eighth Drug Vessel Strike in Eastern Pacific: Latest Military Action Revealed by Hegseth

The United States military executed a strike on a suspected drug-trafficking vessel…
Rubio says commitment to Taiwan won't change amid trade talks with China

Rubio Affirms Unwavering Support for Taiwan Despite Ongoing China Trade Discussions

On Sunday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio reaffirmed the United States’ enduring…
High school coach, wife ID’d as victims killed in crash tied to illegal alien trucker released by Biden admin

Tragic Loss: High School Coach and Wife Killed in Crash Involving Released Illegal Alien Trucker

Two of the three individuals tragically killed in a devastating semi-truck collision…
Lewis Hamilton mourns beloved dog ahead of Mexico's Day of the Dead

Lewis Hamilton Honors Late Dog During Mexico’s Day of the Dead Remembrance

MEXICO CITY, Oct 23 – Lewis Hamilton has shared how the recent…
Our Chicago: llinois Legislative Latino Caucus Foundation fostering the next generation of Latino leaders

Illinois Legislative Latino Caucus Foundation Paves Path for Future Latino Leaders in Chicago

The Illinois Legislative Latino Caucus Foundation was established in 2002 by a…
Eric Swalwell Says Candidates Must Pledge to Demolish Trump Ballroom

Eric Swalwell Urges 2024 Candidates to Vow: Tear Down Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Ballroom

Representative Eric Swalwell from California has recently become the latest figure to…
Warfare expert calls Gaza rebuilding plan 'Disneyland strategy' to defeat Hamas

Warfare Expert Criticizes Gaza Rebuilding Strategy as ‘Disneyland Approach’ in Hamas Conflict Resolution

As the tenuous ceasefire in Gaza holds steady, a novel proposal to…
Trump administration posts notice that no federal food aid will go out Nov. 1

Federal Food Aid Halt: Trump Administration Announces November 1 Suspension

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has announced on its website that federal…
‘Narco-banners’ reportedly threaten Americans in vacation hot spot where cartels rule like mafia: expert

Narco-Banner Warnings: Cartel Threats Target American Tourists in Popular Vacation Destinations

Recent reports of alleged “narco-banners” warning Americans to steer clear of Mexico’s…
AARP Florida creates petition against proposed JEA natural gas plant

Florida AARP Launches Petition to Oppose New JEA Natural Gas Plant Proposal

In Jacksonville, a proposed natural gas plant has sparked controversy, with AARP…