SCOTUS Allows ICE to Keep Arresting Illegals in Sanctuary City Los Angeles
Share this @internewscast.com

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to bypass a lower court’s decision. This earlier ruling had prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting federal immigration enforcement activities, citing these actions as racial profiling.

In July, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by then-President Joe Biden. She had stopped ICE from executing raids in the sanctuary area of Los Angeles, California.

Before the Trump administration sought SCOTUS’s intervention to let ICE persist in capturing illegal immigrants in Los Angeles during the legal proceedings, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had supported Frimpong’s decision.

On Monday, Justice Kavanaugh, representing the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision, stated that “the government has adequately demonstrated the need for a stay while the appeal is pending.”

Justice Kavanaugh emphasized that “stopping individuals based on reasonable suspicions of unlawful presence has long played a critical role in U.S. immigration enforcement efforts for decades, spanning multiple presidential terms.” With the current rise in illegal immigration under Biden, ICE’s attention on Los Angeles appears justified.

Kavanaugh further noted, “Individuals in the country illegally seeking to avoid law enforcement questioning are essentially aiming to bypass the law, which does not constitute a significant legal interest.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sotomayor, in writing a dissenting opinion that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined, called the court’s stay on the lower court’s decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor writes. “Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent.”

The case is Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, No. 25A169 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Empowering the Next Generation: Why Skillful Youth Should Seize Opportunities

When a nation’s youth sees no prospects, it signals a bleak outlook…

Passenger Experiences Breakdown Following Hour-Long Tarmac Delay

A heated incident unfolded aboard a United Airlines flight when a woman…

Critical Warning Signs Overlooked Prior to DC Shooting Incident: A Call for Better Prevention Measures

The case of Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan man accused of a tragic…

Former City Minister and Labour MP Tulip Siddiq Convicted in Corruption Case

Former City Minister Tulip Siddiq has been sentenced to a two-year prison…

Lane Kiffin Faces Backlash from Ole Miss Fans Following Controversial $90M Move to LSU

The roar of a private jet’s engines was no match for the…

Hawaii Trip Sparks Downfall: CEO’s Illustrious Career Crumbles Amid Scandal

An esteemed CEO from Minneapolis finds himself embroiled in scandal, accused of…

Lane Kiffin Fires Back at Angry Ole Miss Fans with Bold Exit Statement

Lane Kiffin responded defiantly to disappointed Ole Miss supporters, who showed their…

Aaron Rodgers Criticizes Steelers Teammate in Recent Comments

A visibly frustrated Aaron Rodgers, sporting a noticeable cut on his nose,…

Lane Kiffin Resigns from Ole Miss to Accept $90 Million LSU Head Coach Position

Lane Kiffin is set to depart from Oxford, and it seems the…

Revealed: Karoline Leavitt’s Connection to Relative Detained by ICE

Attorneys representing the mother of Karoline Leavitt’s nephew have accused the White…

Outrage Erupts as Trump Grants Freedom to Convicted Fraudster in $1.6 Billion Case

Donald Trump is under fire following his decision to commute the sentence…

Unruly Wildlife: Bears, Crocs, and Hippos Fuel Chaos with Substances

Across the globe, wildlife has been exhibiting increasingly unusual behavior, often due…