Trump DOJ says National Guard deployment in LA is 'unreviewable' in appeals court hearing
Share this @internewscast.com

SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — During a courtroom session on Tuesday, federal judges seemed to lean towards agreeing with the Trump administration’s stance regarding the deployment of California National Guard troops by President Trump without prior notification to Governor Gavin Newsom.

In a crucial online hearing before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the Department of Justice contended that President Donald Trump lawfully utilized his executive authority to dispatch troops to support the protection of federal officers and infrastructures during immigration enforcement protests in Los Angeles.

Just last Thursday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, based in San Francisco, ruled temporarily in favor of California to reinstate Governor Newsom’s control over the National Guard. However, only hours afterward, appellate judges issued a temporary halt on Breyer’s decision, setting the stage for their Tuesday session.

PREVIOUS: Trump can keep National Guard in LA for now after appeals court blocks order

The lawsuit was filed last Monday after President Trump issued a Saturday memo to the Department of Defense ordering “at least” 2,000 National Guard members for 60 days minimum.

Brett Shumate, a U.S. attorney representing Trump, said Breyer’s order interferes with the commander-in-chief’s executive power.

“It upends the military chain of command. It gives state governors veto power over the president’s military orders,” he said. “Courts don’t just defer to the president’s judgment – they don’t review the president’s judgment.”

The panel of three judges – including two Trump appointees – pushed back on the DOJ’s assertion, asking the Trump administration hypothetical questions about how far this lack of judicial review could go.

“If a hypothetical future president made the decision to call up in response the militia of every state and the District of Columbia, so 51 militia, would it also be your view that that decision by this hypothetical future president would be entirely unreviewable?” Judge Mark Bennett, a 2018 Trump appointee, asked.

“Yes, because the statute says the president may call into federal service members and units of the guard of any state in such numbers that he considers necessary,” Shumate responded.

Sam Harbourt with the California Department of Justice argued Trump’s deployment was “extreme” and defies precedent.

“Every day that this order remains in effect, it is causing harm to our nation’s broader democratic tradition of separation of the military from civilian affairs,” he said.

MORE: CA Sen. Alex Padilla, Democrats write letter to Pres. Trump to remove military from Los Angeles

Additionally, California argued the president violated the law by not directly contacting Newsom about his deployment. The statute in question allows federal use of state National Guard troops under certain circumstances and that orders doing so shall be issued “through the governors” of such states. Judges appeared skeptical of this point.

“Where does the statute say that issuing it ‘through the governor’ requires either the governor’s consent or requires consultation?” Bennett asked Harbourt.

“We take it from the plain meaning of through the governor,” Harbourt responded. “We think at a minimum, that means that the governor needs to be informed of it and given the chance to issue it.”

Additionally, the state said Trump’s actions are harming California, since those National Guard members would otherwise be working on wildfire prevention efforts as the state heads into peak wildfire season – a point Newsom made in an earlier statement Tuesday.

MORE: CAL FIRE is hiring: Newsom ramping up recruitment as Nat’l Guard firefighting capacity drops

“President Trump’s illegal militarization of Los Angeles is sidelining crucial firefighting and prevention resources,” the governor said. “It’s time to end the chaos and get California’s National Guard back to this important work.”

The judges did not signal how soon they may issue a decision.

Constitutional law professor Rory Little of UC Law San Francisco said the panel’s questions during Tuesday’s hearings were telling.

“Honestly, I’m not sure the court is receptive to the California position. It sounded to me like this could be a reversal of the district court. This could be affirming of the Trump administration’s position, at least at this preliminary stage,” he said.

Little noted that all action in the courts so far has been preliminary. If the appellate court decides to permanently reverse Judge Breyer’s initial temporary restraining order, the National Guard would remain in Trump’s control for at least 60 days.

“If California wins today, that case will go up to the Supreme Court,” he said. “I think if California loses today, it’ll still go to the Supreme Court.”

Copyright © 2025 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like
Yikes: DNC Chair Ken Martin Makes Things Even Worse for Dems When Asked About 'Globalize the Intifada'

DNC Leader Ken Martin Puts Dems in Hot Water with Remarks on ‘Globalize the Intifada’

Those questions about New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani might have…
Alan Dershowitz Drops Bombshells, Says There Is in Fact an Epstein Client List—and He Knows Who's on It

Alan Dershowitz Reveals Shocking News: Confirms the Existence of an Epstein Client List and Claims to Know Who’s Included

Many observers were left dissatisfied with the conclusions, as the department had…
Silver stainless steel water bottle with black lid and handle.

Walmart Urgently Recalls 850,000 Water Bottles After ‘Ejecting’ Incident Leaves Two Blind

An urgent recall has been announced for approximately 850,000 stainless steel water…
Texas flood: Search for missing flood victims is personal for local volunteers in Hunt

Search for Missing Flood Victims in Texas Becomes Personal for Hunt Volunteers

HUNT, Texas (KTRK) — Crews from various regions are aligning along the…
Woman with 'urgent message' for President Trump arrested near Mar-a-Lago security checkpoint

Woman Arrested Near Mar-a-Lago Security for Trying to Deliver Message to President Trump

A woman was taken into custody after she approached Mar-a-Lago, claiming she…
Helicopter dropping cash from the sky.

Chaotic Scene Unfolds as Deceased Man’s Life Savings are Released from Helicopter, Leading to Frenzied Cash Grab

THIS is the moment a dead man’s life savings are dropped from…
Cars parked in a lot near a gated entrance, surrounded by tall pine trees.

Tragic Incident: Teenager Dies After Sand Hole Collapse on Beach

A 17-YEAR-old boy has died on a beach after being buried alive…
Caribbean police work to ID body found during search for missing American as nearby security guard was killed

Caribbean Authorities Seek to Identify Body Found During Search for Missing American After Nearby Security Guard Killing

A security guard was killed about 9 miles from where an American…
Man wrestling a crocodile.

Outrage as Influencer Colton Macaulay Recklessly Confronts Dangerous Crocodile in Viral Stunt

THIS is the shocking moment influencer Colton Macaulay wrestles a deadly croc,…
A Border Force vessel rescuing migrants from a small inflatable boat.

Witnessing 78 Migrants Cross to the UK with Farage: A Blow to ‘Stop the Boats’ Efforts

While Keir Starmer introduced his fresh agreement on managing small boats, I…
Angela Paxton at her husband's impeachment trial.

Senator Angela Paxton Announces Divorce from Texas Attorney General Ken on Biblical Grounds After Nearly 40 Years of Marriage

TEXAS Senator Angela Paxton has filed for divorce from her attorney general…
Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron at a joint press conference.

Starmer and Macron Reveal Agreement to Send Back 50 Migrants Weekly from Boats to France

SIR Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron announced today a one-in-one-out arrangement to…