Weeks before local elections in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany’s most populous state, the right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD) has been rocked by the sudden deaths of seven candidates.

A cluster of fatalities, occurring within a brief period leading up to the September 14 vote, has attracted significant attention. German authorities have characterized the deaths as coincidental—resulting from natural causes, pre-existing conditions, or not disclosed for privacy reasons—asserting no signs of foul play. However, the context of these occurrences, set in a political environment where the AfD is deemed an extremist threat by the establishment, makes them seem anything but coincidental. Skeptics highlight the statistical anomaly: Seven deaths among around 3,000 candidates, primarily focusing on one anti-establishment party ascending in the polls.

The AfD stands firm against globalist agendas: advocating for reinforced borders to curb unregulated migration, halting boundless aid to Ukraine’s ongoing conflict, restarting nuclear reactors closed due to environmental policies, and terminating wind energy projects that have disrupted industries and increased energy expenses. These are not fringe opinions; they challenge the EU-Brussels consensus that prioritizes open borders and interventionist policies over national concerns.

According to BBC reports, which detail the deaths and logistical issues like reprinting ballots in affected districts, authorities emphasize the incidents are legitimate and above suspicion. The Hungarian Conservative examines one case, underscoring a prompt non-criminal verdict despite the suspect context. Yet, as the AfD attempts to triple its vote share in NRW—testing their strength post-federal elections—these occurrences disrupt operations and spark questions. This situation is reminiscent of cartel-driven assassinations in Mexico’s 2024 elections, where dissenting voices were silenced. Independent journalists raise serious concerns, pondering if voicing opposition carries lethal risks.

Details from Main Sources

The deaths transpired in NRW, where the AfD put forward over 3,000 candidates for the September 14 local elections. Authorities claim no links between the cases, citing natural or personal causes without external involvement. Here’s a factual summary sourced from available reports:

• Ralph Lange, age 66 or 67, location unspecified in NRW: Sudden and unexpected death, ruled natural causes.
• Wolfgang Seitz, age 59, location unspecified: Sudden death, official cause natural.
• Wolfgang Klinger, age 71 or 72, location unspecified: Unexpected natural causes.
• Stefan Berendes, age not detailed (likely mid-50s to 60s based on patterns), location unspecified: Sudden death, natural.
• René Herford, age not specified, reserve candidate: Died of kidney failure following a pre-existing liver condition.
• Patrick Tietze, age not specified, reserve: Reported suicide.
• Hans-Joachim Kind, age 80, from Kremenholl in southern Remscheid: Natural causes after a long illness.

These incidents occurred from late August to early September 2025, with the first four announced around September 1, followed by two alternates and the seventh shortly afterwards. While some involved older individuals or those with known health problems, critics note that several—such as Seitz, aged 59—weren’t elderly or previously sick, challenging easy rationalizations.

The BBC offers additional context: Police investigated the initial four deaths and found no foul play, mentioning similar fatalities in other parties (six involving the Greens and Social Democrats post-nomination). Though the AfD’s grouping is noteworthy, particularly as the party—labeled right-wing extremist by domestic intelligence—gains traction in western Germany. Polls predict a leap to 16-17% in NRW, a significant increase from 5.4% in the 2022 state elections. Skepticism in German media, including Welt, mirrors online discussions, with AfD co-leader Alice Weidel endorsing claims of statistical improbability. The outlet acknowledges no evidence connecting the deaths but recognizes the peculiarity.

The Hungarian Conservative focuses on Kind’s case, detailing how authorities quickly ruled it non-criminal, emphasizing his long illness as explanation. Deputy AfD chairman Kay Gottschalk urged probes but warned against conspiracy theories, respecting families. The piece notes the deaths exceed norms—seven among 250 key candidates in weeks—and highlights AfD’s surveillance by intelligence services, adding tension. No direct ties to threats, but the pattern benefits establishment parties like the ruling coalition, which could retain control amid disruptions.

Election fallout is real: Ballots must be reprinted in impacted areas, postal votes recast, creating “immense chaos” per reports. This could suppress turnout or delay results, favoring incumbents in a state of 18 million where AfD’s anti-migration stance resonates. While officials downplay, the concentration raises questions about whether these “natural” ends conveniently sideline challengers.

Parallel to Mexico’s Elections

The AfD’s string of deaths draws stark parallels to Mexico’s 2024 elections, where a record 38 candidates were assassinated in the bloodiest campaign on record. Reuters detailed how violence, largely tied to drug cartels, targeted local politicians—often opposition figures—leading up to the June vote. The final tally included 37 murders, with the last, Jorge Huerta Cabrera in Puebla, shot at a rally. Government efforts to protect 560 candidates fell short amid 828 non-lethal aggressions, and officials often minimized patterns as isolated incidents.

Similarities abound: In both, anti-establishment voices face elimination before polls, with authorities downplaying systemic threats. Mexico’s killings served cartel interests intertwined with global drug networks and porous borders—much like how Germany’s open migration policies benefit elite agendas. Opposition platforms were hit hardest, echoing AfD’s border-sealing push against mass influxes. Official responses in Mexico echoed Germany’s: Blame coincidences or personal issues, not foul play. The facts imply a pattern: Neutralize dissent to preserve the system, whether via bullets in cartel-riddled Mexico or “sudden” ends in surveillance-heavy Germany.

Independent Analysis: Redacted’s Reporting

On Redacted, hosts Clayton and Natalie Morris dissected the AfD deaths with German journalist Naomi Seibt, offering a raw counter to mainstream gloss-overs. Clayton kicked off: “Seven members of the German right-wing AfD party suddenly dropped dead… German authorities say these are just coincidental non-criminal deaths.” He tied it to the party’s anti-globalist bent—sealing borders, ending Ukraine aid, restarting nuclear, ditching green schemes—right before elections.

Seibt called the timing “very off,” rejecting legacy media’s “conspiracy theories” label: “Seven AfD candidates within the span of a few weeks. Something is very off here.” She dismissed pre-existing conditions excuses, noting even if some were 60-plus, the cluster doesn’t add up: “If I maybe eat one Big Mac today and then I drop dead tomorrow, that means I had a pre-existing condition?” Comparing to COVID stats abuse, she argued these deaths are “way more unexpected” than manipulated pandemic figures.

On AfD’s rise, Seibt said they were “definitely headed for a win,” though not superstar candidates. Leaders like Alice Weidel face death threats—canceling events over bomb fears—making the party a prime target: “Why didn’t nobody try to kill somebody like Kamala Harris? That’s because obviously she was not as much of a target.” Strategic hits on lesser-knowns avoid backlash while disrupting.

Seibt dissected rumors, like a syringe incident causing illness: “That’s not normal, that’s not a natural cause.” She urged investigations, respectfully, as crucial: “At the very least investigate what’s actually going on.” As gaslighting example, she detailed 16-year-old Ukrainian Liana’s murder—pushed onto tracks by Iraqi migrants—but initially called an accident. Media smeared AfD probes as racist until truth emerged: “They tried to brainwash every single one of us.”

Seibt revealed intelligence surveillance on AfD, wiretapping phones, raiding homes—including herself on watch lists: “It’s worse than what we’ve lived through in East Germany,” per survivors. Natalie questioned government credibility, citing the Navalny poisoning fabrication: “They made up this crazy circumstance… to vilify Putin.” Now, they’re “ignoring suspicious circumstances.” Seibt agreed: “I don’t care what the government says,” pushing for oversight like family access. She feared escalations: With raids on AfD’s Peter Bystron over baseless Russia claims and candidate bans, “maybe they will resort to different tools and potentially even consider killing them silently.”

Clayton probed locales’ strategic value: Pivotal for AfD majorities? Seibt noted early days but gains in key areas, warning more could follow if bans fail.

What They’re Saying on X

• Naomi Seibt: “🚨🇩🇪 7 AfD MEMBERS JUST DlED – ALICE WEIDEL WARNED US‼️😳 AfD candidates are the targets of intelligence espionage, lawfare, hoax trials, election bans. Tyranny has kiIIed democracy. And now… AfD candidates too? Do you believe it was a coincidence?” Her post ties deaths to systemic attacks, urging scrutiny amid AfD threats.
• Punishable Press: “”Statistically Impossible” 7 AFD candidates die before local elections in Germany.” The account highlights improbability, with a video fueling discussions on patterns and media silence.
• Disclose.tv: “NEW – AfD party has recorded six deaths among its politicians within a short period of time in the run-up to the upcoming local elections in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany — Welt” with update: “UPDATE – Number of deceased AfD candidates rises to seven — Welt.” Their neutral reporting sparks replies comparing to Mexico and accusing foul play.

Conclusion

Unanswered questions linger: Why only AfD in this death wave? Why no deeper probes? Despite surveillance and smears, the party endures, embodying populist grit against elite pressures. Transparent investigations are vital—no lectures, just accountability.

In a time of globalist wars siphoning resources and borders erased for cheap labor, AfD’s push for sovereignty threatens the machine. That’s why they’re targeted: Real change gets crushed to sustain interventions and open societies. Ditch legacy media; track independents for unvarnished truth.