Share this @internewscast.com

WASHINGTON — In ruling that states cannot kick Donald Trump off the ballot, the Supreme Court placed significant limits on any effort — including by Congress — to prevent the former president from returning to office.

Should Trump win the presidential election and lawmakers then seek to not certify the results and prevent him from taking office because he “engaged in insurrection” under Section 3 of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, the decision could foreclose that action.

It is on that point that the court — notionally unanimous in ruling for Trump despite its 6-3 conservative majority — appeared to be divided, with the three liberal justices vehemently objecting to the apparent straitjacket the decision enforced on Congress.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a conservative, wrote her own opinion saying she also believed the court had decided issues it did not need to resolve but she did not join the liberal justices’ separate opinion.

Apparently, without the support of the four women justices, a five-justice majority said that Congress had to act in specific ways to enforce section 3.

“This gives the Supreme Court major power to second guess any congressional decision over enforcement of Section 3,” Rick Hasen, an election law expert at UCLA School of Law, wrote immediately after the ruling.

The Colorado Supreme Court had found Trump had violated the provision in contesting the 2020 presidential election results in actions that ended with the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

In ruling for Trump, the U.S. Supreme Court specified that anything Congress does must be specifically tailored to addressing section 3, an implicit warning that broad legislation could be struck down.

“Today, the majority goes beyond the necessities of this case to limit how Section 3 can bar an oathbreaking insurrectionist from becoming president,” the liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote on their separate opinion.

By weighing in on the role of Congress, “the majority attempts to insulate all alleged insurrectionists from future challenges to their holding federal office,” they added.

One sentence in particular attracted the attention of legal experts, with the liberal justices writing that the majority was seemingly “ruling out enforcement under general federal statutes requiring the government comply with the law.”

Several observers said this may be a reference to Congress’ role in certifying the presidential election results should Trump win in November, which is now governed by the Electoral Count Reform Act enacted in 2022 with the aim of preventing another Jan. 6.

The law includes language saying that Congress can refuse to count electoral votes that are not “regularly given.” That could be interpreted to apply to a winning candidate who members of Congress believe is not eligible to serve under section 3.

Derek Muller, an election law expert at Notre Dame Law School, said it seemed the majority wanted to “close that door.”

But, he added, “the court is speaking somewhat opaquely here, as if it does not want to reveal the true substance of the disagreement.”

Jason Murray, who argued the Colorado case at the Supreme Court on behalf of the voters who wanted Trump kicked off the ballot, said he also thought the court may be referring to the Electoral Count Reform Act.

“It seems to me that one thing that the liberals might be referring to is the possibility that Congress might on January 6, 2025 refuse to count votes that were cast for former President Trump,” he added.

Not everyone agreed with that interpretation, with Richard Pildes, a professor at New York University School of Law, saying the liberal justices may have been referring to the potential for legal challenges about Trump’s authority as president if he were in office again.

If the court was addressing the counting of electoral college votes “they could easily have mentioned that if that’s what they meant,” he added.

Hasen wrote that the ruling means that if Trump wins the election and Congress tries to disqualify him, the Supreme Court “will have the last word.” In the meantime, “we may well have a nasty, nasty post-election period,” he added.


Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like
On Met Gala's eve, the People's Ball struts in the spotlight

The People’s Ball Takes Center Stage on the Eve of the Met Gala

PROSPECT HEIGHTS, Brooklyn — It’s became a yearly tradition, and 2025 did…
Juliana Marins smiling in front of a hillside.

‘I’m Not Scared’: Heartbreaking Last Message from 26-Year-Old Backpacker Who Fell into Volcano Crater During Hike

TRAGIC backpacker Juliana Marins told her family “I’m not afraid” in a…
Dolton Village Board to vote on purchase of Pope Leo's childhood home at 212 East 141st Place

Dolton Village Board to decide on acquiring Pope Leo’s childhood residence at 212 East 141st Place

The back-and-forth dispute between the village of Dolton and the homeowner might…
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker selects Christian Mitchell as running mats for 3rd term bid

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker Chooses Christian Mitchell as Running Mate for Third Term Campaign

CHICAGO (WLS) — Governor JB Pritzker has announced Christian Mitchell will be…
A carer abusing an elderly man in his son's home.

Caregiver Violently Tosses and Threatens 88-Year-Old Dementia Patient Before His Death

THIS is the shocking moment a carer “violently degrades” a frail 88-year-old…
California police nab 7 foreign nationals in jewelry store heist, 1 suspect still loose

California Police Arrest 7 Foreign Nationals in Jewelry Store Robbery; 1 Suspect Remains at Large

Seven men, suspected of jewelry thefts in their home countries, have reportedly…
Bystanders rescuing a teen from a shark attack.

Terrifying Video Captures Shark Pursuing 16-Year-Old Boy, Who Escapes Water with Severely Injured Arm After Attack

THIS is the unbelievable moment a shark chased a teen as he…
United Airlines flight diverted while going to Chicago O'Hare Airport, plane evacuated at St. Louis Lambert International Airport

United Airlines Flight Rerouted to St. Louis Lambert, Evacuated Before Reaching Chicago O’Hare

CHICAGO (WLS) — On Tuesday morning, passengers faced a frightening experience when…
Massachusetts police officer shot by colleague during service of restraining order

Massachusetts Officer Injured in Shooting Incident with Fellow Officer While Serving Restraining Order

An off-duty Massachusetts police officer was shot Monday night during a confrontation…
Claim $150 bonus or $1K first bet safety net for Wimbledon

Grab a $150 Bonus or Secure a $1,000 First Bet Free for Wimbledon

Gambling content 21+. The New York Post may receive an affiliate commission…
Ben Shelton vs. Alex Bolt odds, picks, prediction

Predictions, Betting Odds, and Picks for Ben Shelton vs. Alex Bolt Showdown

Gambling content 21+. The New York Post may receive an affiliate commission…
The challenge the Nets are facing with their huge draft haul

The Dilemma the Nets Face with Their Vast Draft Collection

Having five first-round picks is a First World problem. But that doesn’t…