I must admit I find the Kamala Harris book tour amusing. 

The Democrats are seemingly unaware of how disconnected they are and the challenge of regaining the trust of the American populace. She exemplifies their struggle. Her handling of defeat is reminiscent of Hillary Clinton’s, blaming others for insufficient support. The issue was never her as a poor candidate.

A significant misstep during her campaign was her unsatisfactory response to a question on “The View” posed by Sunny Hostin: What would she do differently than Joe Biden? She failed to provide an answer.

She revisited “The View” on Tuesday to address that past response. Interestingly, they seemed to promote her book with a QR code. Yet, the media claims neutrality. Her response was far from acceptable.

Kamala Harris desperately tries to separate herself from her OWN record as the VIEW abruptly cuts to commercial. pic.twitter.com/Et2Chl2Rzw

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 23, 2025

I didn’t realize how much people wanted to see a distinction between me and President Biden. I assumed it was clear and didn’t want to frame it as a critique. During the campaign, I highlighted the differences, emphasizing the need to lower costs and extend the Child Tax Credit.

She thought the differences were obvious? So obvious she couldn’t enunciate them. 

She claims to have been noting differences during the campaign. However, that interview was part of her campaign efforts. If differences had been outlined, she would have stated them then, which she did not.

Even now, she struggles to articulate them. “We need to bring costs down,” she states. Yes, it is understood. Under her and Joe Biden, prices soared. The issue was her inability to propose how to reduce prices or solve other issues.

What was the primary reason she thinks she lost, Ana Navarro asks her. “There are many factors,” she said. You can say that again. 

Kamala says she lost because she “didn’t have enough time,” to which the “The View” panel nods in agreement, like seals.

NOTE: The longer Kamala was the nominee, the less popular she got. pic.twitter.com/lhl782grPG

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 23, 2025

One of the biggest was “We just didn’t have enough time,” gosh darn it! 

That wasn’t true because the longer she was the nominee and the more people saw of her, the less they wanted her. She also tries to portray it as though it was so close when Trump won all the swing states, and even won the popular vote. The electoral vote count wasn’t close. 

Then this response was bizarre, as she held up her finger and appeared to wobble back and forth

Kamala reacts to Trump’s address to the UN.

“This person and what we just saw in terms of a presentation at the United Nations… they laughed at him the last time… you think they’re not laughing?”

How do you think Kamala’s speech would have gone? pic.twitter.com/ogqpnSjVTc

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 23, 2025

She claimed that world leaders at the UN were probably laughing at him, that they’d laughed at him before. 

What she leaves out is that it was Germany laughing when he said they were putting themselves in a bind with their reliance on Russian oil. He was exactly right. 

UN, 2018 Germans were laughing at President Trump during his speech. They’re not laughing anymore. pic.twitter.com/pfhiXdIjff

— TransOdius (@TransOdius) September 23, 2025

Yet another example of how they were helping Russia while we were helping provide for their defense, yet Trump is the Russian agent? That’s the insane leftist take. 

Kamala’s answer is the globalist response; she wants us to bend over, as she and Joe Biden did. And you know who actually was embarrassing on the world stage? Joe Biden, who would lose focus.