During a press conference on Monday, Representatives Thomas Massie, a Republican, and Ro Khanna, a Democrat, announced that six individuals are potentially implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein files.

These two lawmakers have been at the forefront of efforts to make the Epstein Files public since last July. Their advocacy led to a push for a vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which was eventually enacted by President Trump.

Despite this legislative victory, they continue to advocate for greater transparency. On January 30, the Department of Justice released over 3 million files related to Epstein, but most of those documents were heavily redacted.

Massie, representing Kentucky, informed reporters that the files implicate a person who holds a significant position within a foreign government. He called on the Justice Department under Trump to address these issues and rectify any mistakes.

Among the documents shared by Massie, one stands out with 18 redactions, four of which involve men born before 1970.

Ghislaine Maxwell pleads the fifth 

Monday marked a significant development as it was the first occasion members of Congress could personally examine the unredacted files by visiting a Department of Justice facility in Northeast Washington, D.C., where they accessed the information on DOJ computers.

Representative Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat, who also visited the DOJ office, said that the files contained several previously unreported young victims, one as young as nine.

‘You read through these files, and you read about 15-year-old girls, 14-year-old girls, 10-year-old girls.’

‘I saw a mention of a 9-year-old girl today. I mean, this is just preposterous and scandalous,’ Raskin said. 

Epstein’s longtime girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell pleaded the Fifth and refused to answer questions over Jeffrey Epstein at a closed-door hearing on Capitol Hill.

The jailed British socialite appeared virtually before lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee for less than an hour on Monday.

Maxwell was deposed as part of the bipartisan congressional investigation into the Justice Department’s prosecution and handling of the Epstein case. 

Speaking with reporters on Capitol Hill following Maxwell’s depositions earlier on Monday, Khanna also warned that the fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal could pose a serious threat to the British monarchy, arguing that the controversy extends far beyond individual wrongdoing and into the heart of the UK’s political and social establishment.

Lawmakers demand King Charles address Prince Andrew’s ties 

Khanna said the Epstein case has exposed what he described as a culture of elite impunity, suggesting the monarchy is facing an unprecedented moment of vulnerability. 

‘This is the most vulnerable the British monarchy has ever been,’ Khanna said, adding that the scandal could possibly bring about its downfall. 

Khanna pointed specifically to Prince Andrew’s association with Epstein, as well as the involvement of prominent political figures such as Peter Mandelson, the former UK ambassador in DC, arguing that the release of Epstein-related files reveals a protected network of powerful individuals who have long escaped accountability.

According to Khanna, symbolic actions such as removing royal titles do not amount to meaningful accountability. 

He also called out the silence from senior figures and said that King Charles III has a responsibility to address what he knew about the matter and when.

Khanna warned that if the British monarchy were to collapse under the weight of the Epstein revelations, the consequences would not be limited to the United Kingdom. 

He said the scandal threatens to expose a broader transatlantic elite class, with implications reaching well beyond the royal family.

Have any thoughts? Share with us in the comments 

Ghislaine Maxwell refused to answer questions from House lawmakers

Ghislaine Maxwell on Monday refused to answer questions from House lawmakers investigating the case of her deceased [child predator] lover Jeffrey Epstein. 

Maxwell appeared virtually before lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee for less than hour on Monday morning. 

The deposition took place in a close door interview for the bipartisan House probe into the Justice Department’s prosecution of the late billionaire [child predator]. 

Maxwell pleaded The Fifth and refused to provide any details to lawmakers into her relationship with Epstein. 

Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence in Texas. 

In the lead up to the committee hearing, Republican Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna said they expected Maxwell to plead the Fifth Amendment. 

She was found guilty in December 2021 for [sexual] trafficking and exploiting female minors for Epstein. Justice Department prosecutors accused Maxwell of grooming ‘minor girls to be abused in multiple ways.’ 

Maxwell has come under new scrutiny following the release of over three million documents related to the prosecution of Epstein. 

The documents show that Epstein had access to a large network of powerful business leaders and political figures. 

Maxwell was initially subpoenaed by the Oversight Committee last year, but her attorneys have told lawmakers she will not answered questions regarding Epstein. 

Maxwell’s attorney reportedly told the committee that Maxwell would not answer questions unless she received clemency from President Donald Trump. 

Comer noted that the full video of Maxwell’s testimony will be released. 

Continue reading about Maxwell’s testimony here: 

Police probe claims Andrew shared confidential secrets with Epstein 

Police were today investigating allegations that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor shared confidential reports from his role as the UK’s trade envoy with Jeffrey Epstein. 

Emails released by the US Department of Justice on January 30 appear to show the former duke sharing reports of official visits to Hong Kong, Vietnam and Singapore. 

One email, dated November 2010, was forwarded by Andrew just five minutes after being sent by his then-special advisor, Amit Patel. 

The former duke made the visits in his capacity as trade envoy in late 2010, conducting meetings and trade talks. 

Additionally, on ChristmasEve 2010, Andrew looped Epstein in on a confidential brief on investment opportunities in the reconstruction of Helmand province, Afghanistan. 

Today, a Thames Valley Police spokesman told the Daily Mail: ‘We can confirm receipt of this report and are assessing the information in line with our established procedures.’ 

Andrew could now face prosecution after Graham Smith, chief executive of anti-monarchy group Republic, reported him to the force which polices the Windsor area. 

Mr Smith tweeted today: ‘I have now reported Andrew to the @ThamesVP for suspected misconduct in public office and breach of official secrets in relation to these specific allegations. I cannot see any significant difference between these allegations and those against Peter Mandelson.’ 

Andrew could technically be criminally prosecuted, given the King is the only member of the Royal Family who has sovereign immunity. 

In 2002, Princess Anne became the first Royal Family member to be convicted of a criminal offence when she was fined £500 after one of her dogs bit two children in Windsor Great Park. 

Mr Smith later told the Daily Mail that ‘past experience’ of previous complaints he has made would suggest police will take no action in this case, but added: ‘We’re getting into unprecedented territory.’

‘This lack of action is becoming unsustainable. We’ll have to wait and see.’ 

He cited how detectives launched an investigation into Peter Mandelson over alleged misconduct in public office last week, adding that the case had ‘thrown a spotlight onto this lack of action’ by the Royal Family and there was now a ‘very clear blueprint’. 

Continue reading about Andrew leaking files here: